129 research outputs found
GraphX: Unifying Data-Parallel and Graph-Parallel Analytics
From social networks to language modeling, the growing scale and importance
of graph data has driven the development of numerous new graph-parallel systems
(e.g., Pregel, GraphLab). By restricting the computation that can be expressed
and introducing new techniques to partition and distribute the graph, these
systems can efficiently execute iterative graph algorithms orders of magnitude
faster than more general data-parallel systems. However, the same restrictions
that enable the performance gains also make it difficult to express many of the
important stages in a typical graph-analytics pipeline: constructing the graph,
modifying its structure, or expressing computation that spans multiple graphs.
As a consequence, existing graph analytics pipelines compose graph-parallel and
data-parallel systems using external storage systems, leading to extensive data
movement and complicated programming model.
To address these challenges we introduce GraphX, a distributed graph
computation framework that unifies graph-parallel and data-parallel
computation. GraphX provides a small, core set of graph-parallel operators
expressive enough to implement the Pregel and PowerGraph abstractions, yet
simple enough to be cast in relational algebra. GraphX uses a collection of
query optimization techniques such as automatic join rewrites to efficiently
implement these graph-parallel operators. We evaluate GraphX on real-world
graphs and workloads and demonstrate that GraphX achieves comparable
performance as specialized graph computation systems, while outperforming them
in end-to-end graph pipelines. Moreover, GraphX achieves a balance between
expressiveness, performance, and ease of use
Evaluation and Analysis of Distributed Graph-Parallel Processing Frameworks
A number of graph-parallel processing frameworks have been proposed to address the needs of processing complex and large-scale graph structured datasets in recent years. Although significant performance improvement made by those frameworks were reported, comparative advantages of each of these frameworks over the others have not been fully studied, which impedes the best utilization of those frameworks for a specific graph computing task and setting. In this work, we conducted a comparison study on parallel processing systems for large-scale graph computations in a systematic manner, aiming to reveal the characteristics of those systems in performing common graph algorithms with real-world datasets on the same ground. We selected three popular graph-parallel processing frameworks (Giraph, GPS and GraphLab) for the study and also include a representative general data-parallel computing system— Spark—in the comparison in order to understand how well a general data-parallel system can run graph problems. We applied basic performance metrics measuring speed, resource utilization, and scalability to answer a basic question of which graph-parallel processing platform is better suited for what applications and datasets. Three widely-used graph algorithms— clustering coefficient, shortest path length, and PageRank score—were used for benchmarking on the targeted computing systems.We ran those algorithms against three real world network datasets with diverse characteristics and scales on a research cluster and have obtained a number of interesting observations. For instance, all evaluated systems showed poor scalability (i.e., the runtime increases with more computing nodes) with small datasets likely due to communication overhead. Further, out of the evaluated graphparallel computing platforms, PowerGraph consistently exhibits better performance than others
Algorithms and Software for the Analysis of Large Complex Networks
The work presented intersects three main areas, namely graph algorithmics, network science and applied software engineering. Each computational method discussed relates to one of the main tasks of data analysis: to extract structural features from network data, such as methods for community detection; or to transform network data, such as methods to sparsify a network and reduce its size while keeping essential properties; or to realistically model networks through generative models
- …