63 research outputs found

    Completing circular codes in regular submonoids

    Get PDF
    AbstractLet M be an arbitrary submonoid of the free monoid A∗, and let X⊆M be a variable length code (for short a code). X is weakly M-complete iff any word in M is a factor of some word in X∗ [J. NĂ©raud, C. Selmi, Free monoid theory: Maximality and completeness in arbitrary submonoids, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 13 (5) (2003) 507–516]. Given a regular submonoid M, and given an arbitrary code X⊆M, we are interested in the existence of a weakly M-complete code Xˆ that contains X. Actually, in [J. NĂ©raud, Completing a code in a regular submonoid, in: Acts of MCU’2004, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3354 (2005) 281–291; J. NĂ©raud, Completing a code in a submonoid of finite rank, Fund. Inform. 74 (2006) 549–562], by presenting a general formula, we have established that, in any case, such a code Xˆ exists. In the present paper, we prove that any regular circular code X⊆M may be embedded into a weakly M-complete one iff the minimal automaton with behavior M has a synchronizing word. As a consequence of our result an extension of the famous theorem of SchĂŒtzenberger is stated for regular circular codes in the framework of regular submonoids. We study also the behaviour of the subclass of uniformly synchronous codes in connection with these questions

    Embedding a Ξ\theta-invariant code into a complete one

    Full text link
    Let A be a finite or countable alphabet and let Ξ\theta be a literal (anti-)automorphism onto A * (by definition, such a correspondence is determinated by a permutation of the alphabet). This paper deals with sets which are invariant under Ξ\theta (Ξ\theta-invariant for short) that is, languages L such that Ξ\theta (L) is a subset of L.We establish an extension of the famous defect theorem. With regards to the so-called notion of completeness, we provide a series of examples of finite complete Ξ\theta-invariant codes. Moreover, we establish a formula which allows to embed any non-complete Ξ\theta-invariant code into a complete one. As a consequence, in the family of the so-called thin Ξ\theta--invariant codes, maximality and completeness are two equivalent notions.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1705.0556

    Invariance: a Theoretical Approach for Coding Sets of Words Modulo Literal (Anti)Morphisms

    Full text link
    Let AA be a finite or countable alphabet and let ξ\theta be literal (anti)morphism onto A∗A^* (by definition, such a correspondence is determinated by a permutation of the alphabet). This paper deals with sets which are invariant under ξ\theta (ξ\theta-invariant for short).We establish an extension of the famous defect theorem. Moreover, we prove that for the so-called thin ξ\theta-invariant codes, maximality and completeness are two equivalent notions. We prove that a similar property holds in the framework of some special families of ξ\theta-invariant codes such as prefix (bifix) codes, codes with a finite deciphering delay, uniformly synchronized codes and circular codes. For a special class of involutive antimorphisms, we prove that any regular ξ\theta-invariant code may be embedded into a complete one.Comment: To appear in Acts of WORDS 201

    On residual finiteness of monoids, their SchĂŒtzenberger groups and associated actions

    Get PDF
    RG was supported by an EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellowship EP/E043194/1 held at the University of St Andrews, Scotland.In this paper we discuss connections between the following properties: (RFM) residual finiteness of a monoid M ; (RFSG) residual finiteness of SchĂŒtzenberger groups of M ; and (RFRL) residual finiteness of the natural actions of M on its Green's R- and L-classes. The general question is whether (RFM) implies (RFSG) and/or (RFRL), and vice versa. We consider these questions in all the possible combinations of the following situations: M is an arbitrary monoid; M is an arbitrary regular monoid; every J-class of M has finitely many R- and L-classes; M has finitely many left and right ideals. In each case we obtain complete answers, which are summarised in a table.PostprintPeer reviewe

    On groups of units of special and one-relator inverse monoids

    Get PDF
    Funding: This research of R. D. Gray was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council projects EP/N033353/1 “Special inverse monoids: subgroups, structure, geometry, rewriting systems and the word problem”, and EP/V032003/1 ‘’Algorithmic, topological and geometric aspects of infinite groups, monoids and inverse semigroups”.We investigate the groups of units of one-relator and special inverse monoids. These are inverse monoids which are defined by presentations, where all the defining relations are of the form r=1. We develop new approaches for finding presentations for the group of units of a special inverse monoid, and apply these methods to give conditions under which the group admits a presentation with the same number of defining relations as the monoid. In particular, our results give sufficient conditions for the group of units of a one-relator inverse monoid to be a one-relator group. When these conditions are satisfied, these results give inverse semigroup theoretic analogues of classical results of Adjan for one-relator monoids, and Makanin for special monoids. In contrast, we show that in general these classical results do not hold for one-relator and special inverse monoids. In particular, we show that there exists a one-relator special inverse monoid whose group of units is not a one-relator group (with respect to any generating set), and we show that there exists a finitely presented special inverse monoid whose group of units is not finitely presented.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe
    • 

    corecore