205 research outputs found
Proper Functors and Fixed Points for Finite Behaviour
The rational fixed point of a set functor is well-known to capture the
behaviour of finite coalgebras. In this paper we consider functors on algebraic
categories. For them the rational fixed point may no longer be fully abstract,
i.e. a subcoalgebra of the final coalgebra. Inspired by \'Esik and Maletti's
notion of a proper semiring, we introduce the notion of a proper functor. We
show that for proper functors the rational fixed point is determined as the
colimit of all coalgebras with a free finitely generated algebra as carrier and
it is a subcoalgebra of the final coalgebra. Moreover, we prove that a functor
is proper if and only if that colimit is a subcoalgebra of the final coalgebra.
These results serve as technical tools for soundness and completeness proofs
for coalgebraic regular expression calculi, e.g. for weighted automata
Sound and complete axiomatizations of coalgebraic language equivalence
Coalgebras provide a uniform framework to study dynamical systems, including
several types of automata. In this paper, we make use of the coalgebraic view
on systems to investigate, in a uniform way, under which conditions calculi
that are sound and complete with respect to behavioral equivalence can be
extended to a coarser coalgebraic language equivalence, which arises from a
generalised powerset construction that determinises coalgebras. We show that
soundness and completeness are established by proving that expressions modulo
axioms of a calculus form the rational fixpoint of the given type functor. Our
main result is that the rational fixpoint of the functor , where is a
monad describing the branching of the systems (e.g. non-determinism, weights,
probability etc.), has as a quotient the rational fixpoint of the
"determinised" type functor , a lifting of to the category of
-algebras. We apply our framework to the concrete example of weighted
automata, for which we present a new sound and complete calculus for weighted
language equivalence. As a special case, we obtain non-deterministic automata,
where we recover Rabinovich's sound and complete calculus for language
equivalence.Comment: Corrected version of published journal articl
Well-Pointed Coalgebras
For endofunctors of varieties preserving intersections, a new description of
the final coalgebra and the initial algebra is presented: the former consists
of all well-pointed coalgebras. These are the pointed coalgebras having no
proper subobject and no proper quotient. The initial algebra consists of all
well-pointed coalgebras that are well-founded in the sense of Osius and Taylor.
And initial algebras are precisely the final well-founded coalgebras. Finally,
the initial iterative algebra consists of all finite well-pointed coalgebras.
Numerous examples are discussed e.g. automata, graphs, and labeled transition
systems
A connection between concurrency and language theory
We show that three fixed point structures equipped with (sequential)
composition, a sum operation, and a fixed point operation share the same valid
equations. These are the theories of (context-free) languages, (regular) tree
languages, and simulation equivalence classes of (regular) synchronization
trees (or processes). The results reveal a close relationship between classical
language theory and process algebra
Constraint manipulation in SGGS
SGGS (Semantically-Guided Goal-Sensitive theorem proving) is a clausal theorem-proving method, with a seemingly rare combination of properties: it is first order, DPLL-style model based, semantically guided, goal sensitive, and proof confluent. SGGS works with constrained clauses, and uses a sequence of constrained clauses to represent a tentative model of the given set of clauses.A basic building block in SGGS inferences is splitting, which partitions a clause into clauses that have the same set of ground instances. Splitting introduces constraints and their manipulation, which is the subject of this paper. Specifically, splitting a clause with respect to another clause requires to compute their difference, which captures the ground instances of one that are not ground instances of the other. We give a set of inference rules to compute clause difference, and reduce SGGS constraints to standard form, and we prove that it is guaranteed to terminate, provided the standardization rules are applied only within the clause difference computation
- …