1,691 research outputs found
Secure and fair two-party computation
Consider several parties that do not trust each other, yet they wish to correctly compute some common function of their local inputs while keeping these inputs private. This problem is known as "Secure Multi-Party Computation", and was introduced by Andrew Yao in 1982. Secure multi-party computations have some real world examples like electronic auctions, electronic voting or fingerprinting. In this thesis we consider the case where there are only two parties involved. This is known as "Secure Two-Party Computation". If there is a trusted third party called Carol, then the problem is pretty straightforward. The participating parties could hand their inputs in Carol who can compute the common function correctly and could return the outputs to the corresponding parties. The goal is to achieve (almost) the same result when there is no trusted third party. Cryptographic protocols are designed in order to solve these kinds of problems. These protocols are analyzed within an appropriate model in which the behavior of parties is structured. The basic level is called the Semi-Honest Model where parties are assumed to follow the protocol specification, but later can derive additional information based on the messages which have been received so far. A more realistic model is the so-called Malicious Model. The common approach is to first analyze a protocol in the semi-honest model and then later extend it into the malicious model. Any cryptographic protocol for secure two-party computation must satisfy the following security requirements: correctness, privacy and fairness. It must guarantee the correctness of the result while preserving the privacy of the parties’ inputs, even if one of the parties is malicious and behaves arbitrarily throughout the protocol. It must also guarantee fairness. This roughly means that whenever a party aborts the protocol prematurely, he or she should not have any advantage over the other party in discovering the output. The main question for researchers is to construct new protocols that achieve the above mentioned goals for secure multi-party computation. Of course, such protocols must be secure in a given model, as well as be as efficient as possible. In 1986, Yao presented the first general protocol for secure two-party computation which was applicable only to the semi-honest model. He uses a tool called "Garbled Circuit". Yao’s protocol uses the underlying primitives ("Pseudorandom Generator" and "Oblivious Transfer") as blackboxes which lead to efficient results. After Yao’s work many variants and improvements have been proposed for the malicious model. In this thesis, we design several new protocols for secure two-party computation based on Yao’s garbled circuit. Before we present the details of our new designs, we first show several weaknesses, security flaws or problems with the existing protocols in the literature. We first work in the semi-honest model and then extend it into the malicious model by presenting new protocols. Finally we add fairness to our protocol. Oblivious transfer (OT) is a fundamental primitive in modern cryptography which is useful for implementing protocols for secure multi-party computation. We study several variants of oblivious transfer in this thesis. We present a new protocol for the so-called "Committed OT". This protocol is very efficient in the sense that it is quite good in comparison to the most efficient committed OT protocols in the literature. The abovementioned flaw with the use of OT can be fixed with our committed oblivious transfer protocol. Furthermore, it is more general than all previous protocols, and, therefore, it is of independent interest. We also deal with fairness in this thesis. For protocols based on garbled circuit, so far only Benny Pinkas has presented a protocol in the literature for achieving fairness. We show a subtle problem with this protocol where the privacy of the inputs of one party can be compromised. We also describe this problem in detail which is in fact related to the fairness, and finally propose a more efficient scheme that does achieve fairness
Security and Efficiency Analysis of the Hamming Distance Computation Protocol Based on Oblivious Transfer
open access articleBringer et al. proposed two cryptographic protocols for the computation of Hamming distance. Their first scheme uses Oblivious Transfer and provides security in the semi-honest model. The other scheme uses Committed Oblivious Transfer and is claimed to provide full security in the malicious case. The proposed protocols have direct implications to biometric authentication schemes between a prover and a verifier where the verifier has biometric data of the users in plain form.
In this paper, we show that their protocol is not actually fully secure against malicious adversaries. More precisely, our attack breaks the soundness property of their protocol where a malicious user can compute a Hamming distance which is different from the actual value. For biometric authentication systems, this attack allows a malicious adversary to pass the authentication without knowledge of the honest user's input with at most complexity instead of , where is the input length. We propose an enhanced version of their protocol where this attack is eliminated. The security of our modified protocol is proven using the simulation-based paradigm. Furthermore, as for efficiency concerns, the modified protocol utilizes Verifiable Oblivious Transfer which does not require the commitments to outputs which improves its efficiency significantly
Reuse It Or Lose It: More Efficient Secure Computation Through Reuse of Encrypted Values
Two-party secure function evaluation (SFE) has become significantly more
feasible, even on resource-constrained devices, because of advances in
server-aided computation systems. However, there are still bottlenecks,
particularly in the input validation stage of a computation. Moreover, SFE
research has not yet devoted sufficient attention to the important problem of
retaining state after a computation has been performed so that expensive
processing does not have to be repeated if a similar computation is done again.
This paper presents PartialGC, an SFE system that allows the reuse of encrypted
values generated during a garbled-circuit computation. We show that using
PartialGC can reduce computation time by as much as 96% and bandwidth by as
much as 98% in comparison with previous outsourcing schemes for secure
computation. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach with two sets of
experiments, one in which the garbled circuit is evaluated on a mobile device
and one in which it is evaluated on a server. We also use PartialGC to build a
privacy-preserving "friend finder" application for Android. The reuse of
previous inputs to allow stateful evaluation represents a new way of looking at
SFE and further reduces computational barriers.Comment: 20 pages, shorter conference version published in Proceedings of the
2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Pages
582-596, ACM New York, NY, US
Communication Complexity and Secure Function Evaluation
We suggest two new methodologies for the design of efficient secure
protocols, that differ with respect to their underlying computational models.
In one methodology we utilize the communication complexity tree (or branching
for f and transform it into a secure protocol. In other words, "any function f
that can be computed using communication complexity c can be can be computed
securely using communication complexity that is polynomial in c and a security
parameter". The second methodology uses the circuit computing f, enhanced with
look-up tables as its underlying computational model. It is possible to
simulate any RAM machine in this model with polylogarithmic blowup. Hence it is
possible to start with a computation of f on a RAM machine and transform it
into a secure protocol.
We show many applications of these new methodologies resulting in protocols
efficient either in communication or in computation. In particular, we
exemplify a protocol for the "millionaires problem", where two participants
want to compare their values but reveal no other information. Our protocol is
more efficient than previously known ones in either communication or
computation
The Crypto-democracy and the Trustworthy
In the current architecture of the Internet, there is a strong asymmetry in
terms of power between the entities that gather and process personal data
(e.g., major Internet companies, telecom operators, cloud providers, ...) and
the individuals from which this personal data is issued. In particular,
individuals have no choice but to blindly trust that these entities will
respect their privacy and protect their personal data. In this position paper,
we address this issue by proposing an utopian crypto-democracy model based on
existing scientific achievements from the field of cryptography. More
precisely, our main objective is to show that cryptographic primitives,
including in particular secure multiparty computation, offer a practical
solution to protect privacy while minimizing the trust assumptions. In the
crypto-democracy envisioned, individuals do not have to trust a single physical
entity with their personal data but rather their data is distributed among
several institutions. Together these institutions form a virtual entity called
the Trustworthy that is responsible for the storage of this data but which can
also compute on it (provided first that all the institutions agree on this).
Finally, we also propose a realistic proof-of-concept of the Trustworthy, in
which the roles of institutions are played by universities. This
proof-of-concept would have an important impact in demonstrating the
possibilities offered by the crypto-democracy paradigm.Comment: DPM 201
Secure bit commitment from relativistic constraints
We investigate two-party cryptographic protocols that are secure under
assumptions motivated by physics, namely relativistic assumptions
(no-signalling) and quantum mechanics. In particular, we discuss the security
of bit commitment in so-called split models, i.e. models in which at least some
of the parties are not allowed to communicate during certain phases of the
protocol. We find the minimal splits that are necessary to evade the
Mayers-Lo-Chau no-go argument and present protocols that achieve security in
these split models. Furthermore, we introduce the notion of local versus global
command, a subtle issue that arises when the split committer is required to
delegate non-communicating agents to open the commitment. We argue that
classical protocols are insecure under global command in the split model we
consider. On the other hand, we provide a rigorous security proof in the global
command model for Kent's quantum protocol [Kent 2011, Unconditionally Secure
Bit Commitment by Transmitting Measurement Outcomes]. The proof employs two
fundamental principles of modern physics, the no-signalling property of
relativity and the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.Comment: published version, IEEE format, 18 pages, 8 figure
- …