A review of research methodologies used in studies on mobile handheld devices in K-12 and higher education settings

Mobile handheld devices are increasingly being used in education. In this paper, we undertook a review of empirical based articles to summarise the current research regarding the use of mobile handheld devices (personal digital assistants/PDAs, palmtops, and mobile phones) in K-12 and higher education settings. This review was guided by the following four questions: (a) How are mobile handheld devices such as PDAs, palmtops, and mobile phones used by students and teachers? (b) What types of research methods have been applied using such devices? (c) What data collection methods are used in the research? and (d) What research topics have been conducted on these handheld devices in education settings, as well as their related findings? We summarise and discuss some major findings from the research, as well as several limitations of previous empirical studies. We conclude by providing some recommendations for future research related to mobile handheld devices in education settings.published_or_final_versio

Horizon Report 2009

El informe anual Horizon investiga, identifica y clasifica las tecnologías emergentes que los expertos que lo elaboran prevén tendrán un impacto en la enseñanza aprendizaje, la investigación y la producción creativa en el contexto educativo de la enseñanza superior. También estudia las tendencias clave que permiten prever el uso que se hará de las mismas y los retos que ellos suponen para las aulas. Cada edición identifica seis tecnologías o prácticas. Dos cuyo uso se prevé emergerá en un futuro inmediato (un año o menos) dos que emergerán a medio plazo (en dos o tres años) y dos previstas a más largo plazo (5 años)

Integration of project-based learning strategy with m-learning in the english class

Dissertation about the implementation of m-learning approach in a Project-based Learning proposal

Mobile Usability and User Experience

The chapter locates mobile usability within the broader field of usability studies and identifies new factors that have to be taken into account when learners are using mobile devices. It goes on to discuss how usability affects teaching and learning, through an analysis of a dozen case studies of mobile-supported learning. Human needs in terms of cognitive and ergonomic challenges and contexts of use are discussed. The final part of the chapter considers the role of technical support

The effect of editing techniques on machine translation-informed academic foreing language writing

[EN] Although the field of machine translation has witnessed huge improvements in recent years, its potentials have not been fully exploited in other interdisciplinary areas such as foreign language teaching. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to report an experiment in which this technology was employed to teach a foreign language to a group of students. This mixed-method study explores the effect of teaching editing techniques in machine translation to a group of Persian EFL university students in an academic writing course. Twenty students took part in a 4-day workshop in which one session was devoted to teaching editing techniques and three remaining sessions to the use of editing techniques, namely, correcting mistakes, removing ambiguities, simplifying structures and combining structures. Each session consisted of a pre-test, a training and a post-test. In addition, in each session, one key writing point, namely, determiners, paraphrasing and collocations were discussed. A questionnaire for candidates’ demographic information and another for learning experiences were administered. The results indicated a statistically significant improvement in the overall gain score. Further analysis showed a significant improvement in the use of determiners in contrast to paraphrasing and collocations. Lack of improvement in data driven learning in paraphrasing and collocation seemed to stem from weakness in vocabulary and grammatical knowledge in both the mother tongue and the target language. Analysis of questionnaire data revealed that the instruction proved to be beneficial since it could be easily implemented in correction and confirmation.  On the whole, it can be concluded that providing the correct type of guidance and feedback on how to use machine translation will indeed have a profound effect on foreign language writing skill.Mirzaeian, VR. (2021). The effect of editing techniques on machine translation-informed academic foreing language writing. The EuroCALL Review. 29(2):33-43. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2021.12930OJS3343292Acar, A., Geluso, J., and Shiki, T. (2011). How can search engines improve your writing? CALL-EJ, 12(1), 1−10. Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/12-1/Acar_2011.pdfAnderson, D. D. (1995). Machine translation as a tool in second language learning. CALICO Journal, 13(1), 68−97.BNC Consortium. (2007). The British national corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/Boulton, A. (2010). Data‐driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3), 534−572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00566.xBueno, J. L. (1992). Traducción automática mediante el ordenador (Automatic Translation Using a Computer). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED354715Chambers, A., and O'Sullivan, Í. (2004). Corpus consultation and advanced learners' writing skills in French. ReCALL, 16(1), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004001211Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on teaching and research in the age of information and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7Chujo, K., Oghigian, K., and Akasegawa, S. (2015). A corpus and grammatical browsing system for remedial EFL learners. In A. Leńko-Szymańska and A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp. 109-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.06chuConroy, M. (2010). Internet tools for language learning: University students taking control of their writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 861−882. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1047Crosthwaite, P. (2017) Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: feedback and error correction, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 447−473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1312462Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/Egbert, J. (2005). CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.Eubanks, J., Yeh, H., and Tseng, H. (2018) Learning Chinese through a twenty-first century writing workshop with the integration of mobile technology in a language immersion elementary school, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 346−366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1399911Flowerdew, L. (2015). Data-driven learning and language learning theories. In A. Leńko-Szymańska and A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp. 15−36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.02floFranken, M. (2014). The nature and scope of student search strategies in using a web derived corpus for writing. Language Learning Journal, 42(1), 85−102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.678013Garcia, I., and Pena, M. I. (2011). Machine translation-assisted language learning: Writing for beginners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 471−487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.582687Geiller, L. (2014). How EFL students can use Google to correct their 'untreatable' written errors. The EuroCALL Review, 22(2), 26−45. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2014.3633Geluso, J. (2013). Phraseology and frequency of occurrence on the web: Native speakers' perceptions of Google-informed second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 144−157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.639786Granger, S., Hung, J., and Petch-Tyson, S. (Eds.). (2002). Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1−16.Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183−210. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264516Kilgarriff, A., and Grefenstette, G. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on the web as corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29(3), 333−347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120103322711569Lewis, D. (1997) Machine translation in a modern languages curriculum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10(3), pp. 255−271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822970100305Liu, D., and Jiang, P. (2009). Using a corpus-based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 61−78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00828.xMilton, J. (2006). Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 123−137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.009Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.14Nino, A. (2008). Evaluating the use of machine translation post-editing in the foreign language class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 29−49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701865482O'Neill, E. (2012). The effect of online translators on L2 writing in French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.O'Sullivan, Í., and Chambers, A. (2006). Learners' writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.002Park, K. (2010). Using a specialized corpus and Google custom search engine (CSE) for enhancing L2 teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/xxl13/teaching/au10/588/park_2010.pdfPlonsky, L., and Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is 'big'? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079Reppen, R. (2010). Using corpora in the language classroom. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.Richmond, I. M. (1994) Doing it backwards: Using translation software to teach target language grammaticality. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 7(1), pp. 65−78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822940070106Shei, C. C. (2002) Teaching MT through pre-editing: Three case studies. Proceedings of the 6th EAMT Workshop on Teaching Machine Translation. Manchester, pp. 89−98.Shei, C.-C. (2008). Discovering the hidden treasure on the Internet: Using Google to uncover the veil of phraseology? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 67−85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701865516Smart, J. (2014). The role of guided induction in paper-based data-driven learning. ReCALL, 26(2), 184-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000081Somers, H., Gaspari, F., and Nino, A. (2006). Detecting inappropriate use of free online machine-translation by language students − A special case of plagiarism detection. In 11th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation-Proceedings (pp. 41−48).Todd, R. W. (2001). Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System, 29, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00047-6Yang, Y. (2018). New language knowledge construction through indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 459−480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1414852Yoon, C. (2016). Concordancers and dictionaries as problem-solving tools for ESL academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 209-229. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/yoon.pdfYoon, H., and Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002Yoon, H., and Jo, J. W. (2014). Direct and indirect access to corpora: An exploratory case study comparing students' error correction and learning strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 96-117. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2014/yoonjo.pd