5 research outputs found

    A counterexample to the pseudo 2-factor isomorphic graph conjecture

    Full text link
    A graph GG is pseudo 2-factor isomorphic if the parity of the number of cycles in a 2-factor is the same for all 2-factors of GG. Abreu et al. conjectured that K3,3K_{3,3}, the Heawood graph and the Pappus graph are the only essentially 4-edge-connected pseudo 2-factor isomorphic cubic bipartite graphs (Abreu et al., Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2008, Conjecture 3.6). Using a computer search we show that this conjecture is false by constructing a counterexample with 30 vertices. We also show that this is the only counterexample up to at least 40 vertices. A graph GG is 2-factor hamiltonian if all 2-factors of GG are hamiltonian cycles. Funk et al. conjectured that every 2-factor hamiltonian cubic bipartite graph can be obtained from K3,3K_{3,3} and the Heawood graph by applying repeated star products (Funk et al., Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2003, Conjecture 3.2). We verify that this conjecture holds up to at least 40 vertices.Comment: 8 pages, added some extra information in Discrete Applied Mathematics (2015

    Betwixt and between 2-factor Hamiltonian and perfect-matching-Hamiltonian graphs

    Get PDF
    A Hamiltonian graph is 2-factor Hamiltonian (2FH) if each of its 2-factors is a Hamiltonian cycle. A similar, but weaker, property is the Perfect-Matching Hamiltonian property (PMH-property): a graph admitting a perfect matching is said to have this property if each one of its perfect matchings (1-factors) can be extended to a Hamiltonian cycle. It was shown that the star product operation between two bipartite 2FH-graphs is necessary and sufficient for a bipartite graph admitting a 3-edge-cut to be 2FH. The same cannot be said when dealing with the PMH-property, and in this work we discuss how one can use star products to obtain graphs (which are not necessarily bipartite, regular and 2FH) admitting the PMH property with the help of malleable vertices, which we introduce here. We show that the presence of a malleable vertex in a graph implies that the graph has the PMH-property, but does not necessarily imply that it is 2FH. It was also conjectured that if a graph is a bipartite cubic 2FH-graph, then it can only be obtained from the complete bipartite graph K3,3 and the Heawood graph by using star products. Here, we show that a cubic graph (not necessarily bipartite) is 2FH if and only if all of its vertices are malleable. We also prove that the above conjecture is equivalent to saying that, apart from the Heawood graph, every bipartite cyclically 4-edge connected cubic graph with girth at least 6 having the PMH-property admits a perfect matching which can be extended to a Hamiltonian cycle in exactly one way. Finally, we also give two necessary and sufficient conditions for a graph admitting a 2-edge-cut to be: (i) 2FH, and (ii) PMH.peer-reviewe

    Characterizing Minimally 1-factorable r-Regular Bipartite Graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe possibilities for circuits of length 4 to appear together in a cubic bigraph are classified. That has consequences on the structure of minimally 1-factorable regular bigraphs, i.e. those in which each 1-factor lies in precisely one 1-factorization. We characterize minimally 1-factorable cubic bigraphs of girth 4
    corecore