2,163 research outputs found
The Dynamics of Vehicular Networks in Urban Environments
Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs) have emerged as a platform to support
intelligent inter-vehicle communication and improve traffic safety and
performance. The road-constrained, high mobility of vehicles, their unbounded
power source, and the emergence of roadside wireless infrastructures make
VANETs a challenging research topic. A key to the development of protocols for
inter-vehicle communication and services lies in the knowledge of the
topological characteristics of the VANET communication graph. This paper
explores the dynamics of VANETs in urban environments and investigates the
impact of these findings in the design of VANET routing protocols. Using both
real and realistic mobility traces, we study the networking shape of VANETs
under different transmission and market penetration ranges. Given that a number
of RSUs have to be deployed for disseminating information to vehicles in an
urban area, we also study their impact on vehicular connectivity. Through
extensive simulations we investigate the performance of VANET routing protocols
by exploiting the knowledge of VANET graphs analysis.Comment: Revised our testbed with even more realistic mobility traces. Used
the location of real Wi-Fi hotspots to simulate RSUs in our study. Used a
larger, real mobility trace set, from taxis in Shanghai. Examine the
implications of our findings in the design of VANET routing protocols by
implementing in ns-3 two routing protocols (GPCR & VADD). Updated the
bibliography section with new research work
How to Choose the Relevant MAC Protocol for Wireless Smart Parking Urban Networks?
Parking sensor network is rapidly deploying around the world and is regarded
as one of the first implemented urban services in smart cities. To provide the
best network performance, the MAC protocol shall be adaptive enough in order to
satisfy the traffic intensity and variation of parking sensors. In this paper,
we study the heavy-tailed parking and vacant time models from SmartSantander,
and then we apply the traffic model in the simulation with four different kinds
of MAC protocols, that is, contention-based, schedule-based and two hybrid
versions of them. The result shows that the packet interarrival time is no
longer heavy-tailed while collecting a group of parking sensors, and then
choosing an appropriate MAC protocol highly depends on the network
configuration. Also, the information delay is bounded by traffic and MAC
parameters which are important criteria while the timely message is required.Comment: The 11th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of
Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks (2014
Performance Comparison of Contention- and Schedule-based MAC Protocols in Urban Parking Sensor Networks
Network traffic model is a critical problem for urban applications, mainly
because of its diversity and node density. As wireless sensor network is highly
concerned with the development of smart cities, careful consideration to
traffic model helps choose appropriate protocols and adapt network parameters
to reach best performances on energy-latency tradeoffs. In this paper, we
compare the performance of two off-the-shelf medium access control protocols on
two different kinds of traffic models, and then evaluate their application-end
information delay and energy consumption while varying traffic parameters and
network density. From the simulation results, we highlight some limits induced
by network density and occurrence frequency of event-driven applications. When
it comes to realtime urban services, a protocol selection shall be taken into
account - even dynamically - with a special attention to energy-delay tradeoff.
To this end, we provide several insights on parking sensor networks.Comment: ACM International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies for
Smart Cities (WiMobCity) (2014
Mobility Models for Vehicular Communications
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15497-8_11The experimental evaluation of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) implies elevate economic cost and organizational complexity, especially in presence of solutions that target large-scale deployments. As performance evaluation is however mandatory prior to the actual implementation of VANETs, simulation has established as the de-facto standard for the analysis of dedicated network protocols and architectures. The vehicular environment makes network simulation particularly challenging, as it requires the faithful modelling not only of the network stack, but also of all phenomena linked to road traffic dynamics and radio-frequency signal propagation in highly mobile environments. In this chapter, we will focus on the first aspect, and discuss the representation of mobility in VANET simulations. Specifically, we will present the requirements of a dependable simulation, and introduce models of the road infrastructure, of the driverâs behaviour, and of the traffic dynamics. We will also outline the evolution of simulation tools implementing such models, and provide a hands-on example of reliable vehicular mobility modelling for VANET simulation.Manzoni, P.; Fiore, M.; Uppoor, S.; MartĂnez DomĂnguez, FJ.; Tavares De Araujo Cesariny Calafate, CM.; Cano EscribĂĄ, JC. (2015). Mobility Models for Vehicular Communications. En Vehicular ad hoc Networks. Standards, Solutions, and Research. Springer. 309-333. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15497-8_11S309333Bai F, Sadagopan N, Helmy A (2003) The IMPORTANT framework for analyzing the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for adhoc networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw1:383â403Baumann R, Legendre F, Sommer P (2008) Generic mobility simulation framework (GMSF). In: ACM mobility modelsBononi L, Di Felice M, DâAngelo G, Bracuto M, Donatiello L (2008) MoVES: A framework for parallel and distributed simulation of wireless vehicular ad hoc networks. Comput Netw 52(1):155â179Cabspotting Project (2006) San Francisco exploratoriumâs invisible dynamics initiative. http://cabspotting.org/index.htmlCamp T, Boleng J, Davies V (2002) A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wirel Commun Mobile Comput 2(5):483â502. Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and ApplicationsCavin D, Sasson Y, Schiper A (2002) On the accuracy of MANET simulators. In: Proceedings of the second ACM international workshop on principles of mobile computing. ACM, New York, pp 38â43Choffnes D, Bustamante F (2005) An integrated mobility and traffic model for vehicular wireless networks. In: ACM VANETDavies V (2000) Evaluating mobility models within an ad hoc network. Masterâs thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Boulder, Etats-UnisEhling M, Bihler W (1996) Zeit im Blickfeld. Ergebnisse einer reprĂ€sentativen Zeitbudgeterhebung. In: Blanke K, Ehling M, Schwarz N (eds) Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums fĂŒr Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, vol 121. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 237â274ETH Laboratory for Software Technology (2009) K. Nagel. http://www.lst.inf.ethz.ch/research/ad-hoc/car-traces/Fiore M, HĂ€rri J (2008) The networking shape of vehicular mobility. In: ACM MobiHoc, Hong Kong, ChinaFiore M, Haerri J, Filali F, Bonnet C (2007) Vehicular mobility simulation for VANETS. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual simulation symposium (ANSS 2007), Norfolk, VAFleetnet Project - Internet on the Road (2000) NEC Laboratories Europe. http://www.neclab.eu/Projects/fleetnet.htmGawron C (1998) An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model. Int J Mod Phys C 9(3):393â407Haerri J, Filali F, Bonnet C (2009) Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 11(4):19â41. doi: 10.1109/SURV.2009.090403 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2009.090403HĂ€rri J, Fiore M, Filali F, Bonnet C (2011) Vehicular mobility simulation with VanetMobiSim. Simulation 87(4):275â300. doi: 10.1177/0037549709345997 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037549709345997Hertkorn G, Wagner P (2004) The application of microscopic activity based travel demand modelling in large scale simulations. In: World conference on transport researchHuang E, Hu W, Crowcroft J, Wassell I (2005) Towards commercial mobile ad hoc network applications: a radio dispatch system. In: Sixth ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc 2005), Urbana-Champaign, ILJaap S, Bechler M, Wolf L (2005) Evaluation of routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks in city traffic scenarios. In: ITSTJardosh A, Belding-Royer E, Almeroth K, Suri S (2003) Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom 2003), San Diego, CAKim J, Sridhara V, Bohacek S (2009) Realistic mobility simulation of urban mesh networks. Ad Hoc Netw 7(2):411â430Krajzewicz D (2009) Kombination von taktischen und strategischen EinflĂŒssen in einer mikroskopischen Verkehrsflusssimulation. In: JĂŒrgensohn T, Kolrep H (eds) Fahrermodellierung in Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft. VDI-Verlag, DĂŒsseldorf, pp 104â115Krajzewicz D, Blokpoel RJ, Cartolano F, Cataldi P, Gonzalez A, Lazaro O, Leguay J, Lin L, Maneros J, Rondinone M (2010) iTETRIS - a system for the evaluation of cooperative traffic management solutions. In: Advanced microsystems for automotive applications 2010, VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin, pp 399â410Krajzewicz D, Erdmann J, Behrisch M, Bieker L (2012) Recent development and applications of SUMOâsimulation of urban mobility. Int J Adv Syst Measur 5(3/4):128â138Krauss S (1998) Microscopic modeling of traffic flow: investigation of collision free vehicle dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, UniversitĂ€t zu KölnKrauss S, Wagner P, Gawron C (1997) Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Phys Rev E 55(304):55â97Legendre F, Borrel V, Dias de Amorim M, Fdida S (2006) Reconsidering microscopic mobility modeling for self-organizing networks. Network IEEE 20(6):4â12. doi: 10.1109/MNET.2006.273114Mangharam R, Weller D, Rajkumar R, Mudalige P (2006) GrooveNet: a hybrid simulator for vehicle-to-vehicle networks. In: IEEE MobiquitousMartinez FJ, Cano JC, Calafate CT, Manzoni P (2008) Citymob: a mobility model pattern generator for VANETs. In: IEEE vehicular networks and applications workshop (Vehi-Mobi, held with ICC), BeijingMiller J, Horowitz E (2007) FreeSim: a free real-time freeway traffic simulator. In: IEEE ITSCNagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J Phys I 2(12):2221â2229Nagel K, Wolf D, Wagner P, Simon P (1998) Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: a systematic approach. Phys Rev E 58:1425â1437NOW - Network on Wheels Project (2008) Hartenstein H, HĂ€rri J, Torrent-Moreno M. https://dsn.tm.kit.edu/english/projects_now-project.phpPiorkowski M, Raya M, Lugo A, Papadimitratos P, Grossglauser M, Hubaux JP (2008) TraNS: realistic joint traffic and network simulator for VANETs. ACM Mobile Comput Commun Rev 12(1):31â33RindsfĂŒser G, Ansorge J, MĂŒhlhans H (2002) AktivitĂ€tenvorhaben. In: Beckmann K (ed) SimVV MobilitĂ€t verstehen und lenkenâzu einer integrierten quantitativen Gesamtsicht und Mikrosimulation von Verkehr, Ministry of School, Science and Research of Nordrhein-WestfalenSaha A, Johnson D (2004) Modeling mobility for vehicular ad hoc networks. In: ACM VANETSeskar I, Maric S, Holtzman J, Wasserman J (1992) Rate of location area updates in cellular systems. In: IEEE 42nd vehicular technology conference, 1992, vol 2, pp 694â697. doi: 10.1109/VETEC.1992.245478Sommer C, German R, Dressler F (2011) Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved ivc analysis. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 10(1):3â15Tian J, Haehner J, Becker C, Stepanov I, Rothermel K (2002) Graph-based mobility model for mobile ad hoc network simulation. In: SCS ANSS, San DiegoTreiber M, Helbing D (2002) Realistische mikrosimulation von strassenverkehr mit einem einfachen modell. In: ASIM, Rostock, AllemagneTreiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E 62(2):1805â1824UDel Models for Simulation of Urban Mobile Wireless Networks (2009) Stephan Bohacek. http://www.udelmodels.eecis.udel.eduUMass DieselNet Project (2009) UMass diverse outdoor mobile environment (DOME). https://dome.cs.umass.edu/umassdieselnetUppoor S, Trullols-Cruces O, Fiore M, Barcelo-Ordinas JM (2015) Generation and analysis of a large-scale urban vehicular mobility dataset. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 1:1. PrePrints. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2013.27Varschen C, Wagner P (2006) Mikroskopische Modellierung der Personenverkehrsnachfrage auf Basis von Zeitverwendungstagebuchern. Stadt Region Land 81:63â69Yoon J, Liu M, Noble B (2003) Random waypoint considered harmful. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOMM 2003, San Francisco, CAZheng Q, Hong X, Liu J (2006) An agenda-based mobility model. In: 39th IEEE annual simulation symposium (ANSS-39-2006), Huntsville, A
Vehicular Networks with Infrastructure: Modeling, Simulation and Testbed
This thesis focuses on Vehicular Networks with Infrastructure. In the examined scenarios, vehicular nodes (e.g., cars, buses) can communicate with infrastructure roadside units (RSUs) providing continuous or intermittent coverage of an urban road topology. Different aspects related to the design of new applications for Vehicular Networks are investigated through modeling, simulation and testing on real field. In particular, the thesis: i) provides a feasible multi-hop routing solution for maintaining connectivity among RSUs, forming the wireless mesh infrastructure, and moving vehicles; ii) explains how to combine the UHF and the traditional 5-GHz bands to design and implement a new high-capacity high-efficiency Content Downloading using disjoint control and service channels; iii) studies new RSUs deployment strategies for Content Dissemination and Downloading in urban and suburban scenarios with different vehicles mobility models and traffic densities; iv) defines an optimization problem to minimize the average travel delay perceived by the drivers, spreading different traffic flows over the surface roads in a urban scenario; v) exploits the concept of Nash equilibrium in the game-theory approach to efficiently guide electric vehicles drivers' towards the charging stations. Moreover, the thesis emphasizes the importance of using realistic mobility models, as well as reasonable signal propagation models for vehicular networks. Simplistic assumptions drive to trivial mathematical analysis and shorter simulations, but they frequently produce misleading results. Thus, testing the proposed solutions in the real field and collecting measurements is a good way to double-check the correctness of our studie
A Survey of Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Modeling for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAVs), particularly for small UAVs, due to their affordable
prices, ease of availability, and ease of operability. Existing and future
applications of UAVs include remote surveillance and monitoring, relief
operations, package delivery, and communication backhaul infrastructure.
Additionally, UAVs are envisioned as an important component of 5G wireless
technology and beyond. The unique application scenarios for UAVs necessitate
accurate air-to-ground (AG) propagation channel models for designing and
evaluating UAV communication links for control/non-payload as well as payload
data transmissions. These AG propagation models have not been investigated in
detail when compared to terrestrial propagation models. In this paper, a
comprehensive survey is provided on available AG channel measurement campaigns,
large and small scale fading channel models, their limitations, and future
research directions for UAV communication scenarios
- âŠ