One Benders cut to rule all schedules in the neighbourhood

Logic-Based Benders Decomposition (LBBD) and its Branch-and-Cut variant, namely Branch-and-Check, enjoy an extensive applicability on a broad variety of problems, including scheduling. Although LBBD offers problem-specific cuts to impose tighter dual bounds, its application to resource-constrained scheduling remains less explored. Given a position-based Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulation for scheduling on unrelated parallel machines, we notice that certain $k-$OPT neighbourhoods could implicitly be explored by regular local search operators, thus allowing us to integrate Local Branching into Branch-and-Check schemes. After enumerating such neighbourhoods and obtaining their local optima - hence, proving that they are suboptimal - a local branching cut (applied as a Benders cut) eliminates all their solutions at once, thus avoiding an overload of the master problem with thousands of Benders cuts. However, to guarantee convergence to optimality, the constructed neighbourhood should be exhaustively explored, hence this time-consuming procedure must be accelerated by domination rules or selectively implemented on nodes which are more likely to reduce the optimality gap. In this study, the realisation of this idea is limited on the common 'internal (job) swaps' to construct formulation-specific $4$-OPT neighbourhoods. Nonetheless, the experimentation on two challenging scheduling problems (i.e., the minimisation of total completion times and the minimisation of total tardiness on unrelated machines with sequence-dependent and resource-constrained setups) shows that the proposed methodology offers considerable reductions of optimality gaps or faster convergence to optimality. The simplicity of our approach allows its transferability to other neighbourhoods and different sequencing optimisation problems, hence providing a promising prospect to improve Branch-and-Check methods

Solving DCOPs with Distributed Large Neighborhood Search

The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization has gained momentum in recent years, thanks to its ability to address various applications related to multi-agent cooperation. Nevertheless, solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) optimally is NP-hard. Therefore, in large-scale, complex applications, incomplete DCOP algorithms are necessary. Current incomplete DCOP algorithms suffer of one or more of the following limitations: they (a) find local minima without providing quality guarantees; (b) provide loose quality assessment; or (c) are unable to benefit from the structure of the problem, such as domain-dependent knowledge and hard constraints. Therefore, capitalizing on strategies from the centralized constraint solving community, we propose a Distributed Large Neighborhood Search (D-LNS) framework to solve DCOPs. The proposed framework (with its novel repair phase) provides guarantees on solution quality, refining upper and lower bounds during the iterative process, and can exploit domain-dependent structures. Our experimental results show that D-LNS outperforms other incomplete DCOP algorithms on both structured and unstructured problem instances

Scheduling commercial advertisements for television

The problem of scheduling the commercial advertisements in the television industry is investigated. Each advertiser client demands that the multiple airings of the same brand advertisement should be as spaced as possible over a given time period. Moreover, audience rating requests have to be taken into account in the scheduling. This is the first time this hard decision problem is dealt with in the literature. We design two mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models. Two constructive heuristics, local search procedures and simulated annealing (SA) approaches are also proposed. Extensive computational experiments, using several instances of various sizes, are performed. The results show that the proposed MILP model which represents the problem as a network flow obtains a larger number of optimal solutions and the best non-exact procedure is the one that uses SA