16 research outputs found
ΠΠΠ Π‘ΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ Π’Π ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠ― Π’ΠΠ₯ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ BIG DATA Π ΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠΠ
Background. The future of medicine offers a personalized multimodal approach, focused on the patient, integrated care, intelligent decision support systems for doctors, telemedicine. The solution to these problems can be achieved by Big Data technologies, although their use is controversial.
Materials and methods. The analysis of databases Scopus, Web of Science, Ulrich's Periodicals, eLIBRARY.RU, Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, EconLit, Cochrane Library, UpToDate, ACP Journal Club, HINARI, http://www.meta. ua, http://www.nbuv.gov.ua, etc. for the period from 2007 to 2019 for the keywords "Big Data", "medicine" was made.
Results. It is shown that the goals of using Big Data are to create the most complete registers of medical data exchanging information with each other, use the accumulated information to predict the possibility of the development of diseases and their prevention for each patient, prevent epidemics, create a pricing and payment system, new business models, the use of predictive modeling in the development of drugs, the introduction of electronic patient records that would be available to everyone his doctor, which allows the introduction of personalized medicine. The main Big Data processing technologies are NoSQL, MapReduce, Hadoop, R, hardware solutions. It is proved that the use of Big Data technologies in medicine can be achieved with the widespread use of digital presentation of biomedical information, the feasibility and necessity of ensuring its prompt transmission, including via mobile communications, are shown, unresolved issues in the application of Big Data are indicated (unstructured, syntactic and semantic data problems, redundancy and risk of information distortion, incomplete compliance with the requirements of evidence-based medicine, legal, moral and ethical, insurance aspects, the inadequacy of traditional security mechanisms such as firewalls and anti-virus software).
Conclusions. The data presented indicate the promise of using these technologies to significantly improve the quality of medical care for the population.ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ Big Data Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅, ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ± ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Big Data Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π΅ΡΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ, Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ², Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π±Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ Big Data Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ, ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Big Data (Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅, ΠΌΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅, ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ).ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ· Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π±Π°Π· Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
Scopus, Web of Science, Ulrich's Periodicals, eLIBRARY.RU, Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, EconLit, Cochrane Library, UpToDate, ACP Journal Club, HINARI, ΡΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π°Π· Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
(http:// www.meta.ua,http://www.nbuv.gov.ua), Π΄ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΉ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ±Π½ΠΈΠΊΡΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΡg Data Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ΄ Π· 2007 ΠΏΠΎ 2019 ΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ Β«Big DataΒ», Β«medicineΒ». ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π²ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΉ Big Data Π² ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ° Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²'Ρ, ΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
. Big Data β ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½, ΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²'ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ· ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ·Ρ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Big Data Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Ρ ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΡΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΡΠΆ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΡ, Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΊΡ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠ° ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ°, Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΡΠ³Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΡΡΠΌ, ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠΈ, Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ Π»ΡΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π°ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΠ², Π²ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ°, ΡΠΎ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π± Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π»ΡΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²Ρ ΡΠ° Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Big Data Ρ NoSQL, MapReduce, Hadoop, R, Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΉ Big Data Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ³Π½ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌΡ Π²ΠΈΠ³Π»ΡΠ΄Ρ, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΡΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°Π²Π°Π½Π½Ρ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π°Ρ
ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²'ΡΠ·ΠΊΡ, Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π² Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Big Data (Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
, Π½Π°Π΄ΠΌΡΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Ρ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ, Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°ΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΠΌΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ, ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²Ρ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈ, Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΉΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡΠ² Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊ Π±ΡΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΡΠ° Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ½Π΅ Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ). ΠΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠ²ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ
Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics:false hope or not? A narrative review along the line of Gartner's hype cycle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general, and Machine Learn-ing (ML)-based applications in particular, have the potential to change the scope of healthcare, including orthopaedic surgery.The greatest benefit of ML is in its ability to learn from real world clinical use and experience, and thereby its capability to improve its own performance.Many successful applications are known in orthopaedics, but have yet to be adopted and evaluated for accuracy and efficacy in patients' care and doctors' workflows.The recent hype around AI triggered hope for development of better risk stratification tools to personalize orthopaedics in all subsequent steps of care, from diagnosis to treatment.Computer vision applications for fracture recognition show promising results to support decision-making, overcome bias, process high-volume workloads without fatigue, and hold the promise of even outperforming doctors in certain tasks.In the near future, AI-derived applications are very likely to assist orthopaedic surgeons rather than replace us. 'If the computer takes over the simple stuff, doctors will have more time again to practice the art of medicine'.(76)</p
Use of Machine-Learning Software to Categorize Oncotype DX Data
This study looked into the utilization of machine-learning software known as the Clinical Annotation Research Kit or CLARK to abstract and structure Oncotype DX testing results, a genomic test result that is often reported in text-heavy unstructured clinic notes, into a format that can be merged with larger structured databases. Oncotype DX testing results were abstracted for all the patients and each were labeled both manually and through CLARK as being low, intermediate, high or no score based on their risk level. The labeling accuracy of CLARK was compared to manual abstraction.Doctor of Pharmac
A Review of Big Data Trends and Challenges in Healthcare
The healthcare sector produces an enormous amount of
complicated data from several sources, such as health monitoring systems,
medical devices, and electronic health records. Big data analytics may improve
healthcare by enabling more effective decision-making, improving patient
outcomes, and reducing costs. To improve the operational efficiency of
healthcare organizations, scientific studies must search for the
standardization and integration of data analysis equipment and methods. This
systematic literature review aims to provide current insights on the topic by
analyzing a total of 60 relevant articles published between 2017 and 2023. The
review explores the challenges and opportunities in using big data in
healthcare, including data security, privacy, data quality, interoperability,
and ethical considerations. The article also explores big data analytics'
potential uses in healthcare, such as personalized treatment, disease
prediction and prevention, and population health management. It provides significant
insights for healthcare providers, researchers, and practitioners to make
evidence-based decisions, as well as underlines the need for more research in
this area to fully realize the promise of big data in healthcare
Translational Research in the Era of Precision Medicine: Where We Are and Where We Will Go
The advent of Precision Medicine has globally revolutionized the approach of translational research suggesting a patient-centric vision with therapeutic choices driven by the identification of specific predictive biomarkers of response to avoid ineffective therapies and reduce adverse effects. The spread of "multi-omics" analysis and the use of sensors, together with the ability to acquire clinical, behavioral, and environmental information on a large scale, will allow the digitization of the state of health or disease of each person, and the creation of a global health management system capable of generating real-time knowledge and new opportunities for prevention and therapy in the individual person (high-definition medicine). Real world data-based translational applications represent a promising alternative to the traditional evidence-based medicine (EBM) approaches that are based on the use of randomized clinical trials to test the selected hypothesis. Multi-modality data integration is necessary for example in precision oncology where an Avatar interface allows several simulations in order to define the best therapeutic scheme for each cancer patient
No soldiers left behind: An IoT-based low-power military mobile health system design
Β© 2013 IEEE. There has been an increasing prevalence of ad-hoc networks for various purposes and applications. These include Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) and Wireless Body Area Networks (WBAN) which have emerging applications in health monitoring as well as user location tracking in emergency settings. Further applications can include real-Time actuation of IoT equipment, and activation of emergency alarms through the inference of a user\u27s situation using sensors and personal devices through a LPWAN. This has potential benefits for military networks and applications regarding the health of soldiers and field personnel during a mission. Due to the wireless nature of ad-hoc network devices, it is crucial to conserve battery power for sensors and equipment which transmit data to a central server. An inference system can be applied to devices to reduce data size for transfer and subsequently reduce battery consumption, however this could result in compromising accuracy. This paper presents a framework for secure automated messaging and data fusion as a solution to address the challenges of requiring data size reduction whilst maintaining a satisfactory accuracy rate. A Multilayer Inference System (MIS) was used to conserve the battery power of devices such as wearables and sensor devices. The results for this system showed a data reduction of 97.9% whilst maintaining satisfactory accuracy against existing single layer inference methods. Authentication accuracy can be further enhanced with additional biometrics and health data information
EAST MIDLANDS INTEGRATED LIFESTYLE (ILS) DATABASE: FEASIBILITY STUDY - FINAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background:
A regional integrated database could serve as a rich data source for in-depth analysis in research studies across key Public Health lifestyle areas in the East Midlands. This could inform Public Health policy, service delivery and commissioning decisions. Unfortunately, existing datasets are poorly aligned across the four key Public Health lifestyle areas examined in this study: physical activity, smoking cessation, reduction in alcohol consumption, and diet and weight management. This feasibility study was therefore commissioned by the East Midlands Directors of Public Health Group chaired by Professor Derek Ward, Director of Public Health in Lincolnshire, with funding from the NIHR East Midlands Clinical Research Network and the College of Social Science, University of Lincoln. Public Health researchers in the Mental Health, Health and Social Care Research Group (MH2aSC) at the University of Lincoln were invited to carry out the study to explore the feasibility of developing and implementing an integrated lifestyle database across the East Midlands Region.
Methods:
A scoping review for available evidence was conducted to inform decisions about feasibility of the proposed integrated lifestyle database. This was followed by a consultation exercise with 18 stakeholders, predominantly in the East Midlands, from September 2020 to February 2021. The consultation exercise sought to gather the views of stakeholders, purposively invited to take part due to their role in public health, about the potential feasibility of an integrated database. Stakeholders were identified and invited by email to participate in the consultation meetings which took place via Microsoft Teams. A topic guide, designed specifically for this study, was used to guide the discussion. The meetings were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.
Results:
The scoping literature review revealed potential benefits but also barriers to the development of an integrated lifestyle dataset, and highlighted the need to consider local factors which need to be better understood prior to implementation. These findings from the literature were supported by rustults from the subsequent consultation exercise.
Stakeholders for the most part, welcomed the idea of an integrated East Midlands lifestyle database because of its potential benefits for research and to produce evidence to inform service development and commissioning decisions.
However, concerns were expressed by some providers including anxieties around revealing their business strategies to rival organisations also involved in the provision of lifestyles services, the cost of setting up and running the proposed integrated database, and the complexities involved in information sharing and governance arrangements which would need to be established.
Conclusion:
In view of the findings the following options should be explored while taking into consideration the barriers and facilitators expressed by stakeholders:
1. A fully integrated individual level lifestyle dataset across the whole East Midlands covering all four lifestyle areas, with governance and access controlled by one institution (possibly a Local Authority or a university) that will house and maintain the database.
2. A fully integrated individual level dataset for all four lifestyle areas, within just one geographical area to start with, which is owned by the service provider. There is a need to consider how to make this available more widely, as the providers only report collated data back to the commissioners.
3. A fully integrated individual level dataset initially starting with one health area (possibly smoking which already has a standardised Key Performance Indicators (KPI) across the whole region, (to be rolled out later subject to success), with governance and access controlled by the institution (either a Local Authority or a local university) that will house the database.
4. An integrated aggregated level dataset covering all four lifestyle areas (reporting similar KPIs as is done currently by service providers who report back to their commissioners), across the whole East Midlands, with governance and access controlled by one institution (possibly a Local Authority or a university) that will house and maintain the database.
5. A fully integrated aggregated level dataset for all four lifestyle areas, within just one geographical area to start with, as we have in Lincolnshire, which is owned by the service provider. There is a need to consider how to make this more widely available, as the providers only report collated data back to the commissioners. This is the model already used in Lincolnshire.
6. An integrated aggregated level dataset initially starting with one health area (possibly smoking which already has a standardised KPI) across the whole region, (to be rolled out later subject to success), with governance and access controlled by the institution (either a Local Authority or a local university) that will house the database
An analysis of the effects of certified electronic health records on organizations and patients.
The growing technological advancement of electronic health records can become an issue with quality and electronic patient information exchange if hospitals do not adhere to federal guidelines. It is recommended that hospitals utilize certified electronic health records (EHRs) to receive financial incentives. This certification is supposedly also associated with the quality of the EHR itself. The certification process is criticized for allowing EHR vendors to meet a set of limited functions known in advance. EHRs can affect healthcare quality and electronic health information exchange. This dissertation explored what is known about the effects of certified EHRs on length of stay (LOS) and patient generated health data (PGHD), the relationship between hospital utilization of certified EHRs and LOS, and the relationship between hospital utilization of certified EHRs with hospital capability of allowing the function of PGHD. The first analysis was a scoping review guided by the PRISMA protocol to explore what is known of the effects of certified EHRs on LOS and PGHD. The second analysis used datasets from the American Hospital Association Survey and Information Technology Supplement and Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Health Policy from 2015 to 2019 to understand the relationship between hospital utilization of certified EHRs and LOS through a fixed effects regression model. The final paper analysis used datasets from the American Hospital Association Survey and Information Technology Supplement from 2016 to 2020 to understand the relationship between hospital utilization of certified EHRs and the function of enabling PGHD through a binary logistic regression. There is support amongst researchers on EHRs improving quality, such as, LOS and the function of PGHD improving technology efficiency and others supporting EHRs with more customization and open architecture. There is less known about whether an EHR, certified or non-certified, are different from one another with providing advantages for hospitals. Hospitals with certified EHRs have a longer LOS compared to hospitals with non-certified EHRs. Most hospitals experienced barriers with receiving, sending, or other electronic information exchange. Most hospitals with certified EHRs were more likely to not enable the function for PGHD compared to hospitals with non-certified EHRs. EHRs can be problematic while hospitals are providing hospital care. Although most hospitals possess certified EHRs, most do not enable the function of PGHD. Secondary sources from the survey were completed by the Chief Technology Officer or Chief Information Officer. Further research could be continued with understanding different groupsβ health effects with health information technology. Hospitals may be satisfied with their EHRs but not as abreast on how functional the EHR is and how the EHR can benefit patients
Data Privacy in the Time of Plague
Data privacy is a life-or-death matter for public health. Beginning in late fall 2019, two series of events unfolded, one everyone talked about and one hardly anyone noticed: The greatest world-health crisis in at least 100 years, the COVID-19 pandemic; and the development of the Personal Data Protection Act Committee by the Uniform Law Commissioners (ULC) in the United States. By July 2021, each of these stories had reached a turning point. In the developed, Western world, most people who wanted to receive the vaccine against COVID- 19 could do so. Meanwhile, the ULC adopted the Uniform Personal Data Protection Act (UPDPA) at its annual meeting, paving the way for state legislatures to adopt it beginning in 2022. It has so far been introduced in three jurisdictions.
These stories intersect in public health. Public health researchers struggled with COVID-19 in the United States because they lacked information about individuals who were exposed, among other matters. Understanding other public health threats (e.g., obesity, opioid abuse, racism) also requires linking diverse data on contributing social, environmental, and economic factors. The UPDPA removes some barriers to public health practice and research resulting from the lack of comprehensive federal privacy laws. Its full potential, however, can be achieved only with involvement of public health researchers and professionals. This article analyzes the UPDPA and other comprehensive state privacy statutes, noting the ways that they could promoteβand hinderβpublic health. It concludes with recommendations for public health researchers and professionals to get involved in upcoming legislative debates on data privacy. Lives will depend on the outcomes