21,411 research outputs found
The Bionic Radiologist: avoiding blurry pictures and providing greater insights
Radiology images and reports have long been digitalized. However, the potential of the more than 3.6 billion radiology
examinations performed annually worldwide has largely gone unused in the effort to digitally transform health care. The Bionic
Radiologist is a concept that combines humanity and digitalization for better health care integration of radiology. At a practical
level, this concept will achieve critical goals: (1) testing decisions being made scientifically on the basis of disease probabilities and
patient preferences; (2) image analysis done consistently at any time and at any site; and (3) treatment suggestions that are closely
linked to imaging results and are seamlessly integrated with other information. The Bionic Radiologist will thus help avoiding missed
care opportunities, will provide continuous learning in the work process, and will also allow more time for radiologistsā primary
roles: interacting with patients and referring physicians. To achieve that potential, one has to cope with many implementation
barriers at both the individual and institutional levels. These include: reluctance to delegate decision making, a possible decrease in
image interpretation knowledge and the perception that patient safety and trust are at stake. To facilitate implementation of the
Bionic Radiologist the following will be helpful: uncertainty quantifications for suggestions, shared decision making, changes in
organizational culture and leadership style, maintained expertise through continuous learning systems for training, and role
development of the involved experts. With the support of the Bionic Radiologist, disparities are reduced and the delivery of care is
provided in a humane and personalized fashion
Recommended from our members
Sensor, Signal, and Imaging Informatics in 2017.
ObjectiveāTo summarize significant contributions to sensor, signal, and imaging informatics literature published in 2017.MethodsāPubMedĀ® and Web of ScienceĀ® were searched to identify the scientific publications published in 2017 that addressed sensors, signals, and imaging in medical informatics. Fifteen papers were selected by consensus as candidate best papers. Each candidate article was reviewed by section editors and at least two other external reviewers. The final selection of the four best papers was conducted by the editorial board of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook.ResultsāThe selected papers of 2017 demonstrate the important scientific advances in management and analysis of sensor, signal, and imaging information.ConclusionThe growth of signal and imaging data and the increasing power of machine learning techniques have engendered new opportunities for research in medical informatics. This synopsis highlights cutting-edge contributions to the science of Sensor, Signal, and Imaging Informatics
CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison
Large, labeled datasets have driven deep learning methods to achieve
expert-level performance on a variety of medical imaging tasks. We present
CheXpert, a large dataset that contains 224,316 chest radiographs of 65,240
patients. We design a labeler to automatically detect the presence of 14
observations in radiology reports, capturing uncertainties inherent in
radiograph interpretation. We investigate different approaches to using the
uncertainty labels for training convolutional neural networks that output the
probability of these observations given the available frontal and lateral
radiographs. On a validation set of 200 chest radiographic studies which were
manually annotated by 3 board-certified radiologists, we find that different
uncertainty approaches are useful for different pathologies. We then evaluate
our best model on a test set composed of 500 chest radiographic studies
annotated by a consensus of 5 board-certified radiologists, and compare the
performance of our model to that of 3 additional radiologists in the detection
of 5 selected pathologies. On Cardiomegaly, Edema, and Pleural Effusion, the
model ROC and PR curves lie above all 3 radiologist operating points. We
release the dataset to the public as a standard benchmark to evaluate
performance of chest radiograph interpretation models.
The dataset is freely available at
https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/chexpert .Comment: Published in AAAI 201
- ā¦