2,280 research outputs found

    Optimal greenhouse cultivation control: survey and perspectives

    Get PDF
    Abstract: A survey is presented of the literature on greenhouse climate control, positioning the various solutions and paradigms in the framework of optimal control. A separation of timescales allows the separation of the economic optimal control problem of greenhouse cultivation into an off-line problem at the tactical level, and an on-line problem at the operational level. This paradigm is used to classify the literature into three categories: focus on operational control, focus on the tactical level, and truly integrated control. Integrated optimal control warrants the best economical result, and provides a systematic way to design control systems for the innovative greenhouses of the future. Research issues and perspectives are listed as well

    Model Selection and Optimal Control Design for Automatic Greenhouse Climate Control

    Get PDF

    Model Selection and Optimal Control Design for Automatic Greenhouse Climate Control

    Get PDF

    Efficient evolutionary algorithms for optimal control

    Get PDF
    If optimal control problems are solved by means of gradient based local search methods, convergence to local solutions is likely. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the use of global optimisation algorithms to solve optimal control problems, which are expected to have local solutions. Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) are global optimisation algorithms that have mainly been applied to solve static optimisation problems. Only rarely Evolutionary Algorithms have been used to solve optimal control problems. This may be due to the belief that their computational efficiency is insufficient to solve this type of problems. In addition, the application of Evolutionary Algorithms is a relatively young area of research. As demonstrated in this thesis, Evolutionary Algorithms exist which have significant advantages over other global optimisation methods for optimal control, while their efficiency is comparable.The purpose of this study was to investigate and search for efficient evolutionary algorithms to solve optimal control problems that are expected to have local solutions. These optimal control problems are called multi-modal. An important additional requirement for the practical application of these algorithms is that they preferably should not require any algorithm parameter tuning. Therefore algorithms with less algorithm parameters should be preferred. In addition guidelines for the choice of algorithm parameter values, and the possible development of automatic algorithm parameter adjustment strategies, are important issues.This study revealed that Differential Evolution (DE) algorithms are a class of evolutionary algorithms that do not share several theoretical and practical limitations that other Genetic Algorithms have. As a result they are significantly more efficient than other Genetic Algorithms, such as Breeder Genetic Algorithms (BGA), when applied to multi-modal optimal control problems. Their efficiency is comparable to the efficiency of Iterative Dynamic Programming (IDP), a global optimisation approach specifically designed for optimal control. Moreover the DE algorithms turned out to be significantly less sensitive to problems concerning the selection or tuning of algorithm parameters and the initialisation of the algorithm.Although it is not a DE algorithm, the GENOCOP algorithm is considered to be one of the most efficient genetic algorithms with real-valued individuals and specialized evolutionary operators. This algorithm was the starting point of our research. In Chapter 2 it was applied to some optimal control problems from chemical engineering. These problems were high dimensional, non-linear, multivariable, multi-modal and non-differentiable. Basically with GENOCOP the same solutions were obtained as with Iterative Dynamic Programming. Moreover GENOCOP is more successful in locating the global solution in comparison with other local optimisation algorithms. GENOCOP'S efficiency however is rather poor and the algorithm parameter tuning rather complicated. This motivated us to seek for more efficient evolutionary algorithms.Mathematical arguments found in the literature state that DE algorithms outperform other Evolutionary Algorithms in terms of computational efficiency. Therefore in Chapter 3, DE algorithms, generally used to solve continuous parameter optimisation problems, were used to solve two multi-modal (benchmark) optimal control problems. Also some Breeder Genetic Algorithms (BGA) were applied to solve these problems. The results obtained with these algorithms were compared to one another, and to the results obtained with IDP. The comparison confirmed that DE algorithms stand out in terms of efficiency as compared to the Breeder Genetic algorithms. Moreover, in contrast to the majority of Evolutionary Algorithms, which have many algorithm parameters that need to be selected or tuned, DE has only three algorithm parameters that have to be selected or tuned. These are the population size (µ), the crossover constant (CR) and the differential variation amplification (F). The population size plays a crucial role in solving multi-modal optimal control problems. Selecting a smaller population size enhances the computational efficiency but reduces the probability of finding the global solution. During our investigations we tried to find the best trade-off. One of the most efficient DE algorithms is denoted by DE/best/2/bin . All the investigated DE algorithms solved the two benchmark multi-modal optimal control problems properly and efficiently. The computational efficiency achieved by the DE algorithms in solving the first low multi-modal problem, was comparable to that of IDP. When applied to the second highly multi-modal problem, the computational efficiency of DE was slightly inferior to the one of IDP, after tuning of the algorithm parameters. However, the selection or tuning of the algorithm parameters for IDP is more difficult and more involved.From our investigation the following guidelines were obtained for the selection of the DE algorithm parameters. Take the population size less than or equal to two times the number of variables to be optimised that result from the control parameterisation of the original optimal control problem ( µ ≤ 2n u ). Highly multi-modal optimal control problems require a large value of the differential variation amplification ( F ≥0.9) and a very small or zero value for the crossover constant (0≤ CR ≤0.2). Low multi-modal optimal control problems need a medium value for the differential variation amplification (0.4≤ CR ≤0.6) and a large or medium value for the crossover constant (0.2≤ CR ≤0.5). In contrast to IDP, finding near-optimal values for the algorithm parameters is very simple for DE algorithms.Generally, the DE algorithm parameters are kept constant during the optimization process. A more effective and efficient algorithm may be obtained if they are adjusted on-line. In Chapter 4, a strategy that on-line adjusts the differential variation amplification ( F ) and the crossover constant ( CR ) using a measure of the diversity of the individuals in the population, was proposed. Roughly, the proposed strategy takes large values for F and small values for CR at the beginning of the optimization in order to promote a global search. When the population approaches the solution, F is decreased in order to promote a local search, and the crossover parameter CR is enlarged to increase the speed of convergence. When implemented on the DE algorithm DE/rand/1/bin and applied to the two benchmark multi-modal optimal control problems, the computational efficiency significantly improved and also the probability of locating the global solution.To judge the opportunities and advantages of using Evolutionary Algorithms to solve problems related to optimal control, in Chapter 5 several engineering applications concerning optimal greenhouse cultivation control are considered. In Chapter 5.1 genetic algorithms with binary individuals (Simple Genetic Algorithm) and floating-point representation (GENOCOP) for the individuals are used to estimate some of the parameters of a two-state dynamic model of a lettuce crop, the so-called NICOLET model. This model is intended to predict dry weight and nitrate content of lettuce at harvest time. Parameter estimation problems usually suffer from local minima. This study showed that Evolutionary Algorithms are suitable to calibrate the parameters of a dynamic model. However the required computation time is significant. Partly this is due to the high computational load of a single objective function evaluation, which for parameter optimisation problems involves a system simulation. Even though parameter optimisation is very often performed off-line, thus making computation time perhaps less important, more efficient evolutionary algorithms like DE are to be preferred.In Chapter 5.2 an optimal control problem of nitrate concentration in a lettuce crop was solved by means of two different algorithms. The ACW (Adjustable Control-variation Weight) gradient algorithm, which searches for local solutions, and the DE algorithm DE/best/2/bin that searches for a global solution. The dynamic system is a modified two-state dynamic model of a lettuce crop (NICOLET B3) and the control problem has a fixed final time and control and terminal state constraints. The DE algorithm was extended in order to deal with this.The results showed that this problem probably does not have local solutions and that the control parameterisation required by the DE algorithm causes some difficulties in accurately approximating the continuous solution obtained by the ACW algorithm. On the other hand the computational efficiency of the evolutionary algorithm turned out to be impressive. An almost natural conclusion therefore is to combine a DE algorithm with a gradient algorithm.In Chapter 5.3 the combination of a DE algorithm and a first order gradient algorithm is used to solve an optimal control problem. The DE algorithm is used to approximate the global solution sufficiently close after which the gradient algorithm can converge to it efficiently. This approach was successfully tried on the optimal control of nitrate in lettuce, which unfortunately in this case, seems to have no local solutions. Still the feasibility of this approach, which is important for all types of optimal control problems of which it is unknown a-priori whether they have local solutions, was clearly demonstrated.Finally, in Chapter six this thesis ends with an overall discussion, conclusions and suggestions for future research

    A combined modelling and experimental characterisation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under monochromatic LED illumination

    Get PDF
    Industrial biotechnology is currently synonymous with heterotrophic processes that rely on bacterial, yeast, insect or mammalian cells to biosynthesise products of interest. Microalgae are of substantial biotechnological interest due their polyphyletic nature which grants them access to a wide array of high-value metabolites and their ability to grow under a variety of trophic strategies, including phototrophy. Despite significant process development and optimisation efforts, the full potential of these photosynthetic organisms has yet to be realised. One of the most impactful process parameters when cultivating microalgae is light. It is essential for phototrophic growth and remains highly influential on mixotrophic growth. Indoor cultivations relying on artificial light allow full control of illumination conditions. The advent of LED lights has lowered the costs and improved the flexibility of such installations. Specifically, the spectral composition of LED lights can be accurately and dynamically tailored to the needs of the culture. Spectral composition is known to exert regulatory control over the cell cycle and can affect the cell’s biochemical make up. The effects of illumination strategy on the model microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were characterised at three different levels (a) growth kinetics, (b) biochemical composition and, (c) transcriptional activity at key carbon nodes. To obtain the transcriptional data, RNA extraction protocols were compared and optimised. Additionally, a suite of candidate reference genes was validated to ensure accurate gene expression normalisation was possible in reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) studies. The growth kinetics and biochemical composition data obtained served as inputs for a previously published genome scale metabolic model. An algorithm was developed to approximate the default biomass composition in the model to experimental data in an effort to increase the fidelity of the simulations. The flux distributions obtained thereafter helped to describe the distinct metabolic fingerprints created under different trophic and illumination strategies

    Pre-Harvest Factors Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm for Lettuce

    Get PDF
    The agricultural sector is facing problems on crop development due to climate change and global warming. Crops such as rice, tomato, corn, lettuce, potato, wheat, soybeans and others are affected. Through analyzing the graphical representation of data, no optimum values are observed. In this study, the suitability of the genetic algorithm in finding the best condition for producing high quality lettuce crop was determined. The parameters that were optimized are the light intensity, temperature and CO2. These parameters were essential preharvest factors for lettuce. The system selected the 50 fittest individuals based on the fitness score and then proceeds to the recombination process. A mutation has been applied to test if the solution is the global one. When the iterations had reached the required number of generation, the system stopped and gave the best condition for lettuce. Critical design on GA was done and the best fitness plot was obtained. The GA results showed that the optimum conditions for a highquality lettuce crop needs a light intensity of 175.22296 μmol/m2/s, a temperature of 19.36228 ºC and a CO2 level of 803.01855 ppm
    • …
    corecore