170 research outputs found
Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions
We study the following simple Bayesian auction setting:
m
items are sold to
n
selfish bidders in
m
independent second-price auctions. Each bidder has a
private
valuation function that specifies his or her complex preferences over
all
subsets of items. Bidders only have
beliefs
about the valuation functions of the other bidders, in the form of probability distributions. The objective is to allocate the items to the bidders in a way that provides a good approximation to the optimal social welfare value. We show that if bidders have submodular or, more generally, fractionally subadditive (aka XOS) valuation functions, every Bayes-Nash equilibrium of the resulting game provides a 2-approximation to the optimal social welfare. Moreover, we show that in the full-information game, a pure Nash always exists and can be found in time that is polynomial in both
m
and
n
.
</jats:p
Economic Efficiency Requires Interaction
We study the necessity of interaction between individuals for obtaining
approximately efficient allocations. The role of interaction in markets has
received significant attention in economic thinking, e.g. in Hayek's 1945
classic paper.
We consider this problem in the framework of simultaneous communication
complexity. We analyze the amount of simultaneous communication required for
achieving an approximately efficient allocation. In particular, we consider two
settings: combinatorial auctions with unit demand bidders (bipartite matching)
and combinatorial auctions with subadditive bidders. For both settings we first
show that non-interactive systems have enormous communication costs relative to
interactive ones. On the other hand, we show that limited interaction enables
us to find approximately efficient allocations
A Unifying Hierarchy of Valuations with Complements and Substitutes
We introduce a new hierarchy over monotone set functions, that we refer to as
(Maximum over Positive Hypergraphs). Levels of the hierarchy
correspond to the degree of complementarity in a given function. The highest
level of the hierarchy, - (where is the total number of
items) captures all monotone functions. The lowest level, -,
captures all monotone submodular functions, and more generally, the class of
functions known as . Every monotone function that has a positive
hypergraph representation of rank (in the sense defined by Abraham,
Babaioff, Dughmi and Roughgarden [EC 2012]) is in -. Every
monotone function that has supermodular degree (in the sense defined by
Feige and Izsak [ITCS 2013]) is in -. In both cases, the
converse direction does not hold, even in an approximate sense. We present
additional results that demonstrate the expressiveness power of
-.
One can obtain good approximation ratios for some natural optimization
problems, provided that functions are required to lie in low levels of the
hierarchy. We present two such applications. One shows that the
maximum welfare problem can be approximated within a ratio of if all
players hold valuation functions in -. The other is an upper
bound of on the price of anarchy of simultaneous first price auctions.
Being in - can be shown to involve two requirements -- one
is monotonicity and the other is a certain requirement that we refer to as
(Positive Lower Envelope). Removing the monotonicity
requirement, one obtains the hierarchy over all non-negative
set functions (whether monotone or not), which can be fertile ground for
further research
Draft Auctions
We introduce draft auctions, which is a sequential auction format where at
each iteration players bid for the right to buy items at a fixed price. We show
that draft auctions offer an exponential improvement in social welfare at
equilibrium over sequential item auctions where predetermined items are
auctioned at each time step. Specifically, we show that for any subadditive
valuation the social welfare at equilibrium is an -approximation
to the optimal social welfare, where is the number of items. We also
provide tighter approximation results for several subclasses. Our welfare
guarantees hold for Bayes-Nash equilibria and for no-regret learning outcomes,
via the smooth-mechanism framework. Of independent interest, our techniques
show that in a combinatorial auction setting, efficiency guarantees of a
mechanism via smoothness for a very restricted class of cardinality valuations,
extend with a small degradation, to subadditive valuations, the largest
complement-free class of valuations. Variants of draft auctions have been used
in practice and have been experimentally shown to outperform other auctions.
Our results provide a theoretical justification
Combinatorial Auctions Do Need Modest Interaction
We study the necessity of interaction for obtaining efficient allocations in
subadditive combinatorial auctions. This problem was originally introduced by
Dobzinski, Nisan, and Oren (STOC'14) as the following simple market scenario:
items are to be allocated among bidders in a distributed setting where
bidders valuations are private and hence communication is needed to obtain an
efficient allocation. The communication happens in rounds: in each round, each
bidder, simultaneously with others, broadcasts a message to all parties
involved and the central planner computes an allocation solely based on the
communicated messages. Dobzinski et.al. showed that no non-interactive
(-round) protocol with polynomial communication (in the number of items and
bidders) can achieve approximation ratio better than ,
while for any , there exists -round protocols that achieve
approximation with polynomial
communication; in particular, rounds of interaction suffice to
obtain an (almost) efficient allocation.
A natural question at this point is to identify the "right" level of
interaction (i.e., number of rounds) necessary to obtain an efficient
allocation. In this paper, we resolve this question by providing an almost
tight round-approximation tradeoff for this problem: we show that for any , any -round protocol that uses polynomial communication can only
approximate the social welfare up to a factor of . This in particular implies that
rounds of interaction are necessary for
obtaining any efficient allocation in these markets. Our work builds on the
recent multi-party round-elimination technique of Alon, Nisan, Raz, and
Weinstein (FOCS'15) and settles an open question posed by Dobzinski et.al. and
Alon et. al
- …