6 research outputs found

    Ant colony optimization for power plant maintenance scheduling optimization - a five-station hydropower system

    Get PDF
    The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comA number of algorithms have been developed for the optimization of power plant maintenance schedules. However, the true test of such algorithms occurs when they are applied to real systems. In this paper, the application of an Ant Colony Optimization formulation to a hydropower system is presented. The formulation is found to be effective in handling various constraints commonly encountered in practice. Overall, the results obtained using the ACO formulation are better than those given by traditional methods using engineering judgment, which indicates the potential of ACO in solving realistic power plant maintenance scheduling problems.Wai Kuan Foong, Angus R. Simpson, Holger R. Maier and Stephen Stol

    A fast solution approach to solve the generator maintenance scheduling and hydropower production problems simultaneously

    Get PDF
    The Generator Maintenance Scheduling Problem (GMSP) is a problem that combines a hydropower optimization problem with a scheduling problem. Both problems are known to be hard to solve and combining them leads to an even more challenging mathematical problem. Since the hydropower production functions are nonlinear, hyperplane curve fitting is used to linearize each power production function. The goal of the GMSP is to find an optimal schedule plan to decide when to shut down generators for maintenance. Therefore, one production function needs to be formulated per generator combinations leading to a rather large number of constraints. This paper demonstrates that the complexity of the problems is linked to the number of hyperplanes selected to formulate the power production functions. To accelerate the resolution of the problem, a new heuristic based on the mean square algorithm is presented to reduce the number of hyperplanes required. This heuristic substantially reduces the number of constraints and the solving time is almost ten times faster. Numerical results show that the energy produced and the generated maintenance plannings are similar for both mathematical formulations, more precisely with one hyperplane for each generator combination versus a reduced number of hyperplanes

    Power plant maintenance scheduling using ant colony optimization: an improved formulation

    Get PDF
    Abstract It is common practice in the hydropower industry to either shorten the maintenance duration or to postpone maintenance tasks in a hydropower system when there is expected unserved energy based on current water storage levels and forecast storage inflows. It is therefore essential that a maintenance scheduling optimizer can incorporate the options of shortening the maintenance duration and/or deferring maintenance tasks in the search for practical maintenance schedules. In this article, an improved ant colony optimization-power plant maintenance scheduling optimization (ACO-PPMSO) formulation that considers such options in the optimization process is introduced. As a result, both the optimum commencement time and the optimum outage duration are determined for each of the maintenance tasks that need to be scheduled. In addition, a local search strategy is presented in this article to boost the robustness of the algorithm. When tested on a five-station hydropower system problem, the improved formulation is shown to be capable of allowing shortening of maintenance duration in the event of expected demand shortfalls. In addition, the new local search strategy is also shown to have significantly improved the optimization ability of the ACO-PPMSO algorithm

    Multi-objective pareto ant colony system based algorithm for generator maintenance scheduling

    Get PDF
    Existing multi-objective Generator Maintenance Scheduling (GMS) models have considered unit commitment problem together with unit maintenance problem based on a periodic maintenance strategy. These models are inefficient because unit commitment does not undergo maintenance and periodic strategy cannot be applied on different types of generators. Present graph models cannot generate schedule for the multi-objective GMS models while existing Pareto Ant Colony System (PACS) algorithms were not able to consider the two problems separately. A multi-objective PACS algorithm based on sequential strategy which considers unit commitment and GMS problem separately is proposed to obtain solution for a proposed GMS model. A graph model is developed to generate the units’ maintenance schedule. The Taguchi and Grey Relational Analysis methods are proposed to tune the PACS’s parameters. The IEEE RTS 26, 32 and 36-unit dataset systems were used in the performance evaluation of the PACS algorithm. The performance of PACS algorithm was compared against four benchmark multi-objective algorithms including the Nondominated Sorting Genetic, Strength Pareto Evolutionary, Simulated Annealing, and Particle Swarm Optimization using the metrics grey relational grade (GRG), coverage, distance to Pareto front, Pareto spread, and number of non-dominated solutions. Friedman test was performed to determine the significance of the results. The multiobjective GMS model is superior than the benchmark model in producing the GMS schedule in terms of reliability, and violation objective functions with an average improvement between 2.68% and 92.44%. Friedman test using GRG metric shows significant better performance (p-values<0.05) for PACS algorithm compared to benchmark algorithms. The proposed models and algorithm can be used to solve the multi-objective GMS problem while the new parameters’ values can be used to obtain optimal or near optimal maintenance scheduling of generators. The proposed models and algorithm can be applied on different types of generating units to minimize the interruptions of energy and extend their lifespan

    Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions

    Get PDF
    Abstract not availableH.R. Maier, Z. Kapelan, Kasprzyk, J. Kollat, L.S. Matott, M.C. Cunha, G.C. Dandy, M.S. Gibbs, E. Keedwell, A. Marchi, A. Ostfeld, D. Savic, D.P. Solomatine, J.A. Vrugt, A.C. Zecchin, B.S. Minsker, E.J. Barbour, G. Kuczera, F. Pasha, A. Castelletti, M. Giuliani, P.M. Ree
    corecore