Are web mentions accurate substitutes for inlinks for Spanish universities?

This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limitedurpose – Title and URL mentions have recently been proposed as web visibility indicators instead of inlink counts. The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of these alternative web mention indicators in the Spanish academic system, taking into account their complexity (multi-domains) and diversity (different official languages). Design/methodology/approach – Inlinks, title and URL mentions from 76 Spanish universities were manually extracted from the main search engines (Google, Google Scholar, Yahoo!, Bing and Exalead). Several statistical methods, such as correlation, difference tests and regression models, were used. Findings – Web mentions, despite some limitations, can be used as substitutes for inlinks in the Spanish academic system, although these indicators are more likely to be influenced by the environment (language, web domain policy, etc.) than inlinks. Research limitations/implications – Title mentions provide unstable results caused by the multiple name variants which an institution can present (such as acronyms and other language versions). URL mentions are more stable, but they may present atypical points due to some shortcomings, the effect of which is that URL mentions do not have the same meaning as inlinks. Practical implications – Web mentions should be used with caution and after a cleaning-up process. Moreover, these counts do not necessarily signify connectivity, so their use in global web analysis should be limited. Originality/value – Web mentions have previously been used in some specific academic systems (US, UK and China), but this study analyses, in depth and for the first time, an entire non-English speaking European country (Spain), with complex academic web behaviour, which helps to better explain previous web mention results.Ortega, JL.; Orduña Malea, E.; Aguillo, IF. (2014). Are web mentions accurate substitutes for inlinks for Spanish universities?. Online Information Review. 38(1):59-77. doi:10.1108/OIR-10-2012-0189S5977381Adecannby, J. (2011), “Web link analysis of interrelationship between top ten African universities and world universities”, Annals of Library and Information Studies, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 128-138.Aguillo, I. (2009). Measuring the institution’s footprint in the web. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 540-556. doi:10.1108/073788309Aguillo, I.F. , Ortega, J.L. and Fernández, M. (2008), “Webometric ranking of world universities: introduction, methodology, and future developments”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 33 Nos 2/3, pp. 234-244.Aguillo, I. F., Granadino, B., Ortega, J. L., & Prieto, J. A. (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1296-1302. doi:10.1002/asi.20433Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). The use of web search engines in information science research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 231-288. doi:10.1002/aris.1440380106Bar-Ilan, J. (2004). A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country - the case of Israel. Scientometrics, 59(3), 391-403. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000018540.33706.c1Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environments. Information Processing & Management, 41(4), 973-986. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.02.005Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227. doi:10.1002/asi.20077Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G. (1996), “Transforming data”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 312 No. 7033, p.Cronin, B., Snyder, H. W., Rosenbaum, H., Martinson, A., & Callahan, E. (1998). Invoked on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1319-1328. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1998)49:143.0.co;2-wFriedman, M. (1937). The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675-701. doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522Harries, G., Wilkinson, D., Price, L., Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2004). Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping. Journal of Information Science, 30(5), 436-447. doi:10.1177/0165551504046736Heimeriks, G. and Van den Besselaar, P. (2006), “Analyzing hyperlink networks: the meaning of hyperlink based indicators of knowledge”, Cybermetrics, Vol. 10, available at: http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v10i1p1.pdf (accessed 10 July 2013).Heimeriks, G., Hörlesberger, M., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2003). Scientometrics, 58(2), 391-413. doi:10.1023/a:1026296812830Kousha, K. and Horri, A. (2004), “The relationship between scholarly publishing and the counts of academic inlinks to Iranian university web sites: exploring academic link creation motivations”, Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 13-22.Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1537-1549. doi:10.1002/asi.21085Kretschmer, H., & Aguillo, I. F. (2004). Visibility of collaboration on the Web. Scientometrics, 61(3), 405-426. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000045118.68430.fdOrduña-Malea, E. (2012), “Fuentes de enlaces web para análisis cibermétricos (2012)”, Anuario Thinkepi, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 276-280.Orduña-Malea, E. (2013), “Espacio universitario español en la Web (2010): estudio descriptivo de instituciones y productos académicos a través del análisis de subdominios y subdirectorios”, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, Vol. 36 No. 3.Orduña-Malea, E., & Ontalba-Ruipérez, J.-A. (2012). Proposal for a multilevel university cybermetric analysis model. Scientometrics, 95(3), 863-884. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0868-5Orduña-Malea, E., Serrano-Cobos, J., Ontalba-Ruipérez, J. A., & Lloret-Romero, N. (2010). Presencia y visibilidad web de las universidades públicas españolas. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 33(2), 246-278. doi:10.3989/redc.2010.2.740Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2008). Visualization of the Nordic academic web: Link analysis using social network tools. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1624-1633. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.010Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Análisis estructural de la web académica iberoamericana. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 32(3), 51-65. doi:10.3989/redc.2009.3.689Ortega, J. L., Aguillo, I., Cothey, V., & Scharnhorst, A. (2007). Maps of the academic web in the European Higher Education Area — an exploration of visual web indicators. Scientometrics, 74(2), 295-308. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0218-9Qiu, J., Chen, J., & Wang, Z. (2004). An analysis of backlink counts and Web Impact Factorsfor Chinese university websites. Scientometrics, 60(3), 463-473. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000034387.76981.83Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Lomi, A., Aguillo, I., & Barberio, V. (2012). Factors affecting web links between European higher education institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 435-447. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.03.001Seidman, E. (2007), “We are flattered, but …”, Bing Community, available at: www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2007/03/28/we-are-flattered-but.aspx (accessed 20 October 2012).Smith, A.G. (1999), “A tale of two web spaces: comparing sites using web impact factors”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 577-592.Smith, A., & Thelwall, M. (2002). Scientometrics, 54(3), 363-380. doi:10.1023/a:1016030415822Stuart, D., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Investigating triple helix relationships using URL citations: a case study of the UK West Midlands automobile industry. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 97-106. doi:10.3152/147154406781775968Thelwall, M. (2001). Extracting macroscopic information from Web links. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1157-1168. doi:10.1002/asi.1182Thelwall, M. (2002). An initial exploration of the link relationship between UK university Web sites. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 118-126. doi:10.1108/00012530210435248Thelwall, M. and Aguillo, I.F. (2003), “La salud de las web universitarias españolas”, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 291-305.Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2008). Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 805-815. doi:10.1002/asi.20803Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1488-1497. doi:10.1002/asi.21571Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2012). Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 44-52. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.10.002Thelwall, M., & Zuccala, A. (2008). A university-centred European Union link analysis. Scientometrics, 75(3), 407-420. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1831-8Thelwall, M., Tang, R., & Price, L. (2003). Scientometrics, 56(3), 417-432. doi:10.1023/a:1022387105904Thelwall, M., Binns, R., Harries, G., Page-Kennedy, T., Price, L., & Wilkinson, D. (2002). Scientometrics, 53(1), 95-111. doi:10.1023/a:1014836021080Vaughan, L. (2012). An Alternative Data Source for Web Hyperlink Analysis: «Sites Linking In» at Alexa Internet. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 6(1), 31-42. doi:10.1080/09737766.2012.10700922Vaughan, L., & Romero-Frías, E. (2012). Exploring Web keyword analysis as an alternative to link analysis: a multi-industry case. Scientometrics, 93(1), 217-232. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0640-xVaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313-1322. doi:10.1002/asi.10338Vaughan, L., & Yang, R. (2012). Web data as academic and business quality estimates: A comparison of three data sources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1960-1972. doi:10.1002/asi.22659Vaughan, L., & You, J. (2010). Word co-occurrences on Webpages as a measure of the relatedness of organizations: A new Webometrics concept. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 483-491. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.005Vaughan, L., Kipp, M. E. I., & Gao, Y. (2007). Why are Websites co-linked? The case of Canadian universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 81-92. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1707-y(The) Washington Post(2009), “It's official: Yahoo-Microsoft announce ten-year search/ad pact”, The Washington Post, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/29/AR2009072901108.html (accessed 27 February 2013).Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., & Price, L. (2003). Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 29(1), 49-56. doi:10.1177/016555150302900105Zhang, Y. (2006). The Effect of Open Access on Citation Impact: A Comparison Study Based on Web Citation Analysis. Libri, 56(3). doi:10.1515/libr.2006.14

Corporate venturing – a new way of creating a company’s future

Purpose – More and more companies are embarking on an experimental journey into an unpredictable future – a future that is characterised by uncertainty and new challenges. Corporate venturing enables established companies, so-called incumbents, to deal with new markets and business models in a highly flexible and innovative way, besides their existing business and well known, successful business models. A new innovator’s dilemma has emerged: not only established companies are required to be increasingly creative and to question existing thought patterns, but it is similar for start ups and new businesses. Research method – After conceptualising the paper and conducting literature bibliometry by VOSviewer, the research gap was identified. It is based on the three presented approaches: Causation, Effectuation and Bricolage as transformative approaches for strategic decision-making. Using a qualitative research by conducting 30 in-depth interviews, a transcription and a MaxQDA analysis, 5 identified corporate venturing tools were shown. Originality/value – The paper introduces a new approach of management which rapidly gains importance and which is crucial for companies in upcoming times to compete with flexible and disruptive start-up based business models.Thomas BAAKEN: [email protected] ALFERT: [email protected] KLIEWE: [email protected] BAAKEN, Professor - Managing Director of the Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre, MünsterCarina ALFERT, MA - Academic Researcher, Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre, Münster, Münster & VU Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The NetherlandsThorsten KLIEWE, Professor - Research Director of the Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre, MünsterAlfert C., Bossink B., Baaken T., Kliewe T., 2019, Linking corporate venturing and effectuation in established organizations. A theory-focused literature review, [in:] Proceedings of HTSF, High Tech Small Firms Conference, Enschede, Netherlands, 27-28 May 2019.Antoncic B., Hisrich R.D., 2003, Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept, “Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development”, vol. 10(1), pp. 7-24, DOI: 10.1108/14626000310461187.Baker T., Miner A.S., Eesley D.T., 2003, Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process, “Research Policy”, vol. 32(2), pp. 255-276.Baker T., Nelson R.E., 2005, Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, vol. 50(3), pp. 329-366, DOI: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.Battistini B., Hacklin F., Baschera P., 2013, The State of Corporate Venturing: Insights from a Global Study, “Research-Technology Management”, vol. 56(1), pp. 31-39, DOI: 10.5437/08956308X5601077.Birkinshaw J., Hill S.A., 2005, Corporate Venturing Units, “Organizational Dynamics”, vol. 34(3), pp. 247-257, DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.06.009.Bosma N.S., Stam E., Wennekers S., 2011, Intrapreneurship versus independent entrepreneurship: A cross-national analysis of individual entrepreneurial behaviour, Utrecht School of Economics, Working Papers, vol. 11(4).Bouette R.D., 2004, Creative Coupling Programme, Report prepared for the Government of Victoria, Melbourne.Bryman A., Bell E., 2015, Business research methods, Fourth edition, University Press, Oxford.Chesbrough H., 2010, Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers, “Long Range Planning”, vol. 43(2-3), pp. 354-363, DOI: 0.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010.Christensen C.M., Raynor M.E., McDonald R., 2015, What is disruptive innovation, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 93(12), pp. 44-53.Christensen C.M., 1997, The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Christensen C.M., Overdorf M., 2000, Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 78(2), pp. 6-77.Covin J.G., Garrett R.P., Gupta J.P., Kuratko D.F., Shepherd D.A., 2018, The Interdependence of Planning and Learning among Internal Corporate Ventures, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, vol. 42(4), pp. 537-570, DOI: 10.1177/1042258718783430.Davey T., Meerman A., Galan-Muros V., Orazbayeva B., Baaken T., 2018, The State of University-Business Cooperation in Europe, Report for the European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels.Dew N., Sarasvathy S.D., 2001, Of immortal firms and mortal markets: Dissolving the Innovator’s Dilemma, Presented at: The Second Annual Technology Entrepreneurship Research Policy Conference, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, December.Dew N., Sarasvathy S.D., Rea S., Wiltbank R., 2008, Immortal firms in mortal markets?: An entrepreneurial perspective on the “innovator’s dilemma”, “European Journal of Innovation Management”, vol. 11(3), pp. 313-329, DOI: 10.1108/14601060810888982.Duymedjian R., Rüling C.-C., 2010, Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory, “Organization Studies”, vol. 31(2), pp. 133-151, DOI: 10.1177/0170840609347051.van Eck N.J., Waltman L., 2017, Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer, “Scientometrics”, vol. 111(2), pp. 1053-1070, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.Evald M.R., Senderovitz M., 2013, Exploring Internal Corporate Venturing in SMEs: Effectuation at Work in a New Context, “Journal of Enterprising Culture”, vol. 21(03), pp. 275-299, DOI: 10.1142/S021849581350012X.Fisher G., 2012, Effectuation, Causation, and Bricolage: A Behavioral Comparison of Emerging Theories in Entrepreneurship Research, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, vol. 36(5), pp. 1019-1051, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x.Franco M., de Fátima Santos M., Ramalho I., Nunes C., 2014, An exploratory study of entrepreneurial marketing in SMEs: The role of the founder-entrepreneur, “Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development”, vol. 21(2), pp. 265-283, DOI: 10.1108/JSBED-10-2012-0112.Futterer F., Schmidt J., Heidenreich S., 2018, Effectuation or Causation as the Key to Corporate Venture Success? Investigating Effects of Entrepreneurial Behaviors on Business Model Innovation and Venture Performance, „Long Range Planning”, vol. 51(1), pp. 64-81, DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008.Garrett Jr. R.P., Neubaum D.O., 2013, Top management support and Initial strategic assets: A dependency model for internal corporate venture performance, “Journal of Product Innovation Management”, vol. 30(5), pp. 896-915, DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12036.Harms R., Schiele H., 2012, Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process, “Journal of International Entrepreneurship”, vol. 10(2), pp. 95-116, DOI: 10.1007/s10843-012-0089-2.Hmieleski K.M., Corbett A.C., 2006, Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions, “Journal of Small Business Management”, vol. 44(1), pp. 45-63, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00153.x.Faschingbauer M., Baierl R., Grichnik D., 2013, Effectuation: Gestalten statt Vorhersagen, [in:] Das unternehmerische Unternehmen: revitalisieren und gestalten der Zukunft mit Effectuation, Grichnik D., Gassmann O. (eds.), Springer-Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 3-21.Kliewe T., Alfert C., Baaken T., 2019, Corporate Venture Management und Entrepreneurial Marketing, [in:] Entrepreneurial Marketing, PraxisWISSEN Marketing, Rumler A., Stumpf M. (eds.), UNI-Edition, Berlin, pp. 16-30, DOI: 10.15459/95451.28.Kliewe T., Marquardt P., Baaken T., 2009, Leveraging Organizational Resources by Creative Coupling: An Evaluation of Methods for Intellectual Asset Identification, “Journal of Knowledge Globalization”, vol. 2(2), pp. 1-23.Kötting M., Kuckertz A., 2018, Innovationsförderung durch Corporate Venturing, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322835366_Innovationsforderung_durch_Corpo rate_Venturing_Ein_ganzheitliches_Framework_fur_die_praktische_Umsetzung, [date of entry: 02.11.2018]Kuratko D.F., Covin J.G., Garrett R.P., 2009, Corporate venturing: Insights from actual performance, “Business Horizons”, vol. 52(5), pp. 459-467, DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor. 2009.05.001.Kuratko D.F., 2010, Corporate entrepreneurship: An introduction and research review, [in:] Handbook of entrepreneurship research, Springer, New York, pp. 129-163.Lévi-Strauss C., 1966, The savage mind, University Press, Chicago.Lumpkin G.T., 2007, Intrapreneurship and innovation, [in:] The Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Baum J.R., Frese M., Baron R. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 237-264.MacMillan I.C., Block Z., Narasimha P.S., 1986, Corporate venturing: Alternatives, obstacles encountered, and experience effects, “Journal of Business Venturing”, vol. 1(2), pp. 177-191.Mainela T., Puhakka V., 2009, Organising New Business in a Turbulent Context: Opportunity Discovery and Effectuation for IJV Development in Transition Markets, “Journal of International Entrepreneurship”, vol. 7, pp. 111-134, DOI: 10.1007/s10843-008-0034-6.Mayring P., 2010, Qualitative inhaltsanalyse, [in:] Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 601-613.Mes F., 2011, Internal Corporate Venturing zur Steigerung der Innovationsfähigkeit etablierter Unternehmen, Gabler, Wiesbaden.Miles M.P., Covin J.G., 2002, Exploring the practice of corporate venturing: Some common forms and their organizational implications, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, vol. 26(3), pp. 21-40, DOI: 10.1177/104225870202600302.Moe N.B., Dingsøyr T., Dybå T., 2010, A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 52(5), pp. 480-491, DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.004.Narayanan V.K., Yang Y., Zahra S.A., 2009, Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework, “Research Policy”, vol. 38(1), pp. 58-76, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.015.Nolte A., Pe-Than E.P.P., Filippova A., Bird C., Scallen S., Herbsleb J.D., 2018, You Hacked and Now What?: Exploring Outcomes of a Corporate Hackathon, [in:] Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, t. 129.O’Reilly C.A., Tushman M.L., 2008, Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma, “Research in Organizational Behavior”, vol. 28, pp. 185-206, DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002.Parker S.K., Collins C.G., 2010, Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors, “Journal of Management”, vol. 36(3), pp. 633-662, DOI: 10.1177/0149206308321554.Perry J.T., Chandler G.N., Markova G., 2012, Entrepreneurial effectuation: a review and suggestions for future research, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, vol. 36(4), pp. 837-861, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x.Petzold N., Landinez L., Baaken T., 2019, Disruptive innovation from a process view: A systematic literature review, „Creativity and Innovation Management Journal”, vol. 28(1), pp. 1-18, DOI: 10.1111/caim.12313.Poguntke, M. 2016, Abstrakte Interaktionsmodelle für die Integration in bestehende Benutzerschnittstellen (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ulm).Scaringella L., Radziwon A., 2018, Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 136, pp. 59-87, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023.Sarasvathy S.D., 2001, What makes entrepreneurs entrepreneurial?, The Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia, Virginia.Sarasvathy S.D., Berglund H., 2010, On the Relevance of Decision-making in Entrepreneurial Decision-making, [in:] Historical foundations of entrepreneurial research, Landström H., Lohrke L. (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 163-184.Schmidt A.L., Alfert C., Petzold N., Junker C., 2018, Business Model Innovation in Corporate Ventures – The Nucleus of Disruption, [in:] Proceedings of 19th International CINet Conference Continuous Innovation: Spinning out and spinning in, Dublin, September.Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., 1999, Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, vol. 23(3), pp. 11-28.Stokes D., 2000, Entrepreneurial marketing: a conceptualisation from qualitative research, “Qualitative market research – an international Journal”, vol. 3(1), pp. 47-54, DOI: 10.1108/13522750010310497.1(99)32

Wpływ zmian w polityce ekonomicznej i globalizacji na postęp techniczny i konkurencyjność gospodarki Wielkiej Brytanii

Zdigitalizowano i udostępniono w ramach projektu pn. Rozbudowa otwartych zasobów naukowych Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, dofinansowanego z programu „Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki” Ministra Edukacji i Nauki na podstawie umowy SONB/SP/512497/2021.Adams J, Institutions and Economic Development: Structure, Process and Incentive, [w:] Tool M.R., Institutional Economics: Theory, Method, Policy, Kluwer, London 1993.Aghion P., Howitt P., Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge 1998.Alesina A., Ardagna S., Nicoletti G., Schiantarelli F., Regulation and Investment, NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, March 2003.Alford B.W.E., British Economic Performance 1945-1975, Macmillan, London 1988.Allen R.G.D., Teoria makroekonomiczna, PWE, Warszawa 1975.Allen T.J., Hauptman O., The Influence of Communication Technologies on Organizational Structure: A Conceptual Model for Future Research, "Communication Research", No. 14, 1987.Allsopp C., Jenkinson T., Morris D., The Assessment: Macroeconomic Policy in the 1980s, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vo1.7, No. 3, 1997.Allsopp C., Monetary and Fiscal Policy in the 1980s, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", No. 1, 1985.Amable B., Institutional cemplementarity and diversity of social system of innovation and production, ,,Review of Intemational Political Economy", Vol. 7, No. 4, 2000.Antonelli C., The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics, Kluwer, Cambridge 1995.Aoki M., Dore R. (eds.), The Japanese Firm: Sources of Competitive Strength, Clarendon Press, 1994.Archibugi D., Lundval B. (ed.), The Globalizing Learning Economy, Oxford University Press, 2001.Argy V., International Macroeconomics Theory and Policy, Routledge, London 1994.Armstrong M., Cowan S., Vickers J., Regulatory reform. Economic Analysis and British Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge 1995.Arrow J.K., The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, ,,Review of Economic Studies", Vol . 29, 1962.Atkinson A.B., Income Distribution in Europe and the United States, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 12 , No. 1, 1996.Atkinson J., Emerging U.K. Work Patterns in Flexible Manning: The Way Ahead, Institute of Manpower Studies, London, Report 88/1984.Baltagi B.H., Griffin J.M., A General Index of Technical Change, "Joumal of Political Economy", Vol. 96, 1988.Barro RJ., Sala-i-Martin X., Economic Growth, McGraw and Hill, New York 1995.Barro RJ., Sala-i-Martin X., Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth, ,,Review of Economics Studies", Vol. 59, 1992.Barrow M., Newell A., United Kingdom, [w:] Dyker D. (ed.), The National Economies of Europe, Longman, London 1992.Bartlett C., Ghoshal S., Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press, 1991.Bassanini A., Scarpetta S., Growth. Technological Change, and ICT Diffusion: Recent Evidence From OECD Countries, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 18, No. 3, 2002.Bean C., Symons J., Ten Years of Mrs T., Discussin papers, CEPR, London, 316/1989.Bean C., Crafts N., British Beonomie Growth since 1945, [w:] Crafts N., Toniolo G. (eds.), Economic Growth in Europe since 1945, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Beath J., UK lndustriai Policy : Old Tunes on New Instruments?, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy". Vol. 18, No. 2, 2002.Becker G.S., Murphy K.M., Tamura R., Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth, "Journal ot Political Economy", No. 98, 1990.Beesley M.E., Privatization, Regulation & Deregulation, Routledge, London 1992.Begg D., Fiscal Policy, [w:] Dornbusch R., Layard R. (eds.), The Performance of the British Economy, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.Bell M., Pavitt K., Technological Accumułation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries, "Industrial and Corporate Change", No. 2, 1993.Benhabib J., Spiegel M.M., The Role of Human Capital in Beonomic Development: Evidence from Cross-country Data, ,,Journal of Monetary Economics", No. 34, 1994.Berger S., Dore R. (eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism, Cornell University Press, New York 1996.Bieńkowski W., Reaganomika i jej wpływ na konkurencyjność gospodarki amerykańskiej, PWN, Warszawa 1995.Bieńkowski W., Completion of Systemic Transformation Processes in Post-Communist Countries as a Condition for Successful Development of Economic Cooperation, Eastern European Economics, M. Sharpe 2002.Binswanger H.B., A Microeconomic Approach to Induced Innovation, ,,Economic Journal", Vol. 84, 1974.Bishop M., Kay J., Does Privatisation Work? Lessons from UK, Centre for Business Strategy, London 1988.Blair T., The third way. New poiitics for the new century, Fabian Society, London 1999.Blaug M., Teoria ekonomii. PWN, Warszawa 1997.Bocian A.F., Polityka gospodarcza. Wybrane elementy, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Białystok 2002.Boeri T., Nicoletti G., Scarpetta S., Regulation and Labour Market Performance, [w:] Galli G., Pelkmans J. (eds.), Regulatory Reform and Competitiveness in Europe, Edward EIgar, Northampton 2000.Bond S.R., Devereux M.P., Gammie M.J., Tax Reform to Promote Investment, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy" , Vol. 12, No. 2, 1997.Borrus M., Zysman J., Wintelism and the Changing Terms of Global Competition: Prototype of the Future, ,,BRIE Working Paper", 98B, 1997.Bossak J.W., Bieńkowski W., Międzynarodowa zdolność konkurencyjna kraju i przedsiębiorstw. Wyzwania dla Polski na progu XXI wieku, SGH, Warszawa 2004.Boyer R., Drache D. (eds.), States against Markets, Routledge, New York 1996.Brech M., Stout D.K., The Rate of Exchange and Non-Price Competitiveness: a Provisional Study With in UK Manufactured Exports, "Oxford Economic Papers", Suplement, Vol. 33, 1981.Britton S.R, Macroeconomics Policy in Britain 1974-87, Cambridge University Press, 1991.Broadberry S.N., Comparative Productivity Levels in Manufacturing since the Industrial Revolution: Lessons from Britain, America, Germany and Japan, "Structural Change and Economic Dynamics", No. 6, 1995.Brzozowski M., Kubielas S., Dyfuzja technologii i import kapitału w warunkach liberalizacji obrotów kapitałowych i handlowych, [w:] Michałek J.J. , Siwiński W., Socha M. (red.), Od liberalizacji do integracji Polski z Unią Europejską: mechanizmy i skutki gospodarcze, PWN, Warszawa 2003.Burmeister E., Dobell A.R., Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth, McMillan, London 1970.Burton-Jones A., Knowledge Capitalism. Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy, Oxford University Press, 2001.Buxton T., Competitiveness of UK Exports, [w:] Buxton T., Chapman P., TempIe P. (eds.), Britain's Economic Performance, Routledge, London 1998.Buxton T., Chapman P., TempIe P. (eds.), Britain 's Economic Performance, Routledge, London 1997.Buxton T., Mayes D., Murfin A., UK Trade Performance and R&D, "Economics of Innovation and New Technology", Vol. 1, No. 3, 1991.Byers S., A New Era in Competition, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 18, No. 2, 2002.Cairncross A., The British Economy since 1945, Blackwell, Oxford 1992.Cameron R., Historia gospodarcza świata, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1996.Cantner U., Hanusch H., Process and Product Innovations in an International Trade Context, ,,Economie of Innovation and New Technology", Vol. 2, No. 3, 1993.Cantwell J.A, The Globalization of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model ?, "Cambridge Journal of Economics", No. 19, 1995.Cantwell J.A., The Internationalisation of Technological Activity and its Implications for Competitiveness, [w:] Granstrand O., Hakanson L., Sjolander S. (eds.), Technology Management and International Business: Internationalization of R&D and Technology, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester 1999.CBI (Confederation of British Industry), Quality Assured - the CBI Review of NVQs and SVQs, CBI, London 1999.CEPS, Macroeconomic and Fiscal Policy in a Low-speed Europe, Macroeconomic Policy group, 4th Annual Report, ch. 1, Brussels, May 2002.Chatterji D., Manuel T.A, Benefiting from External Sources of Technology, ,,Research Technology Management", Vol. 36, No. 6, 1999.Chenery H., Robinson S., Syrquin M. (eds.), Industrialization and Growth, World Bank Research Publications, Oxford University Press, 1986.Ciborowski R., Innowacje techniczne a system gospodarczy Wielkiej Brytanii, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Białystok 1999.Ciborowski R., Transfer techniki a zdolność konkurencyjna gospodarki, [w:] A. H. Jasiński (red.), Innowacje i transfer techniki w gospodarce polskiej, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Białystok 2000.Ciborowski R.W., Grabowiecki J., Innovation Capacity Adjustment, "International Journal of Technology Policy and Management", No. 3, 2003.Clark I., Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford University Press, 1999.Coombs R., Saviotti P., Walsh V., Economics and Technical Change, Macmillan, London 1987.Coutts K., Godłey W., Does Britain's Balance of Payments Matter Any More ?, [w:] Michie J. (ed.), The Economic Legacy 1979-92 , AP San Diego 1992.Crafts N., Globalization and Growth in the Twentieth Century, IMF Working Paper, WP 00/44, IMF Research Department, Washington 2000.Crafts N., O'Mahony N., A Perspective on UK Productivity Performance, "Fiscał Studies", Vol. 22, No. 3, 2001.Crafts N., Reversing Relative Economic Decline? The 1980s in Historical Perspective, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 7, No. 3, 1991.Crafts N., Toniolo G . (eds.), Economic Growth in Europe since 1945, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CRIC, Patterns in UK Company lnnovation Styles - New Evidence from the CBI Innovation Trends Survey, Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, London 1998.CRL, UK R&D Scoreboard, Cambridge Research Lab, London 1993.CSO(a), Annual Abstract of Statistics, Central Statistical Office, London, 1987-2002.CSO(b), Annual Census of Production, Central Statistical Office, London 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003.CSO(c), Economic Trends, Central Statistical Office, London, wyd. różne.CSO(d), National lncome and Expenditure, Central Statistical Office, London, wyd. różne.CSO(e), UK Competitiveness lndicators, Central Statistical Office, London 2003.CSO(f), UK National Accounts, Central Statistical Office, London, wyd. różne.Curwen P. (ed.), Understanding the UK Economy, Macmillan, London 1992.Dinopoulos E., Segerstrom P., A Schumpeterian Model of Protection and Real Wages, "American Economic Review", No. 89, 1999.DES, Education and Training Statistics, Department for Education and Skills, London 2002.Dodgson M., Rothwell R. (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 1994.Dore R. (ed.), Improving Britain's Industrial Performance, Employment Institute, London 1991.Dore R., Lazonick W., O'Sullivan M., Varieties of Capitalism in the Twentieth Century, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 15, No. 4, 1999.Dornbusch R., Layard R. (eds.), The Performance of the British Economy, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.Dosi G. (ed.), Technical Change and Economy Theory, Pinter, London 1988.Dosi G., Pavitt K., Soete L., The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, Harvester Wheatsheat, London 1990.Dosi G., Teece D.J., Chytry J., Technological, Organization and Competitiveness. Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, 1998.DTI(a), Allocation of the Science Budget, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2002.DTI(b), Cmnd 4176, London, The Stationery Office, Department of Trade and Industry, London 1994.DTI(c), Competitiveness White Paper, The Stationery Office, Department of Trade and Industry, London 1998.DTI(d), Cmnd 278, The Department of Enterprise, Department of Trade and Industry, London 1988.DTI(e), The Government's Manufacturing Strategy, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2002.DTI(g), R&D Scoreboard, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2000.DTI(h), UK Innovation Performance: Strengths, Weakness, Opponunities, Threats and Main Problems, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2002.DTI(i), Regional Innovation Performance, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2002.DTI(j), Innovation Report, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2003.DTI(k), Community Innovation Survey, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2001.Dunn M., Smith S., Economic Policy and Privatisation, [w:] Savage S .P., Robins L., Public Policy Under Thatcher, Macmillan, London 1988.Dunning J.H., Global Capitalism at Bay?, Routledge, London 2001.Dunning J.H. , Governments, Globalization and International Business, Oxford University Press, 1999.Dunning J.H., Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism, ,,Journal of Intemational Business Studies", No. 3, 1995.Dunning J.H., Regions, Globalization and the Knowledge Based Economy, Oxford University Press, 2000.Easterly W., Rebelo S., Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation, ,,Journal of Monetary Economics", Vol. 32, 1993.Ebbinghaus B., Visser J., Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945, Macmillan, London 2000.Employment Department, Labour Market and Skills Trends, Sheffield, 1995-2001.Engel C., Rogers J.H., Regional Patterns in the Law of One Price: The Role of Geography versus Currencies, [w:] Frankel J.A. (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago University Press, 1998.Englander A.S., Mittelstadt A., Total Factor Productivity: Macroeconomic and Structural Aspects of the Slowdown, "OECD Economic Studies", No. 10, 1988.Ennew C., Greenaway D., Reed G., Funher Evidence on Effective Tariffs and Effective Protection in the UK, "Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics", No. 52, 1990.Ergas H., Does technology policy matter?, [w:] Guile B.R., Brooks H. (eds.), Technology and Global Industry, National Academy Press, Washington 1987.European Commission, Key Figures 2002. Science, Technology and Industry. Towards a European Research Area, Brussels 2002.European Patent Office, dostępne na stronie: http://www.uspto.gov/web/office/comEurope in Figures, "The Economist", 2002.Eurostat Yearbook. A Statistical Eye on Europe, Luxemburg, wyd. różne.Excellence and Opportunity: A Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century, Department of Trade and Industry, London 2001.Fagerberg J., International Competitiveness, "Economic Joumal", Vol. 98, No. 2, 1988.Fagerberg J., Technology and Competitiveness, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 12, No. 3, 1996.Fagerberg J., Verspagen B., Tunzelman von G.N., The Economics of Convergence and Divergence: An Overview, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, 1994.Fare R., Grosskopf S., Logan J., The Relative Performance of Publicly Owned and Privately Owned Electric Utilities, "Journal of Public Economics", No. 26, 1985.Feenstra R.C., Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy, ,,Journal of Economic Perspectives", Vol. 12, No. 4, 1998.Fiedor B., Neoklasyczna teoria postępu technicznego. Próba systematyzacji i krytycznej analizy, Akademia Ekonomiczna, Wrocław 1986.,,Fiscal Studies", No. 8, 1987.Flaherty M.T., Coordinating International Manufacturing and Teehnology, [w:] Porter M.E. (ed.), Competition in Global Industries, Boston Harvard Business School Press, 1986.,,Forbes Magazine", dostępne na stronie: http://www.forbes.com/Fraser R., Privatisation: The UK Experienee and International Trends, Longrnan, Londyn 1988.Freernan C., Clark J., Soete L., Unemployment and Technical lnnovation. A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development, Pinter, London 1982.Freernan C., Hagedoorn J., Convergence and Divergence in the Internationalization of Technology, [w:] Technical Change and the World Economy, E. Elgar, Aldershot 1995.Freeman C., Long Waves in the World Economy, Pinter, London 1984.Freeman C., The Economics of Industrial lnnovation, Penguin Books, London 1973.Frenkel J.A., Wei S.J., Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: Economies and Polities, [w:] Frenkel J.A. (ed.), The Regionalization of World Economy, University of Chicago Press, 1998.Friedrnan T.L., Lexus i drzewo oliwne. Zrozumieć globalizację, Rebis, Poznań 2001.Galbraith J.K., The New lndustrial State, Houghton Miffin, Boston 1967.Garncarczyk M., lnstytueje a organizacja w nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej, "Gospodarka Narodowa", nr 5-6, 2002.Golden M., Lange P., Wallerstein M., Union Centralization among Advanced Industrial Societies: An Empirieal Studies, dostępne na: www.shelley.sscnet.ucla.edu/data.Gomułka S., Teoria innowacji i wzrostu gospodarczego, CASE, Warszawa 1998.Goodman A., Webb S., For Richer, for Poorer, " Institute for Fiscal Studies Commentary", No. 49, 1994.Gordon R.J., Does the "New Economy" Measure up to the Great Inventions of the Past?, "The Journal of Economic Perspectives", Vol. 14, No. 4, 2000.Grabowiecki R., Wpływ systemu finansowo - podatkowego na konkurencyjność polskich przedsiębiorstw przemysłowych (w świetle doświadczeń zagranicznych), IRISS, Warszawa, nr 43, 1996.Graham A.W.M., Objectives and Instruments, [w:] Morris D. (ed.), The Economic System in the UK, Oxford University Press, 1977.Griliches Z., R&D and the Produetivity Slowdown, "American Econornic Review", Vol. 70, No. 2, 1980.Grossrnan G., Helpman E., Trade, innovation and growth, "American Econornic Review", Papers and proceedings, May 1990.Grossrnan G.M., Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence, E. Elgar Publishing, Brookfield, 1996.Grossrnan G.M., Helpman E., Innovation and Growth in The Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge 1991.Hakason L., International Decentralisation of R&D - The Organisational Challenges, [w:] Bartlett C., Doz Y., Hedlund G. (eds.), Managing the Global Firm, RoutIedge, London 1990.Haliżak E., Kuźniar R. (red.), Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza, struktura, dynamika, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa 2000.Hall P.A., Franzese J., Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining and European Monetary Union, ,,International Organization", No. 52, 1998.Hall P.A., Soskice D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, 2001.Hall R.E., Jorgenson D.W., Tax Policy and Investment Behavior, "American Economic Review", Vol. 52, 1967.Hansen G.D., Prescott E.C., Malthus to Solow, „American Economic Review", Vol. 92, 2002.Harlow C., Innovation and Productivity Under Nationalisation, G.Allen & UNWIN Ltd., London 1977.Harrod R., Towards a Dynamic Economics. Some Recent Developments of Economic Theory and their Application to Policy, Macmillan, London 1960.Heald D., Public Expenditure. It's Defence and Reform, Martin Robertson, Oxford 1983.Heertje A., Economics and Technical Change, Wiedenfeld, London 1973.Helm D., Mayer C., Mayhew K., The Assessment: Microeconomic Policy in the 1980s, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 7, No. 3, 1997.Henderson P.D., Two British Errors: Their probably size and some possible lessons, "Oxford Economic Papers", Vol. 29, No. 2, 1977.Hicks J.R., Theory of Wages, McMillan, London 1963.Hirschey R.C., Caves R.E., Research and Transfer of Technology by Multinational Enterprises, "Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics", No. 43, 1981.HM Treasury, Financial and Economic Obligations of the Nationalised Industries, 1961.HMSO(a) , Annual Review of Government Funded R&D 1997, London 1998.HMSO(b), Competition Act, London 1998.HMSO(c), Competitiveness - Forging Ahead, Cm2867, London 1995.HMSO(d), Forward Look of Government-Funded Science, Engineering and Technology, Office of Science and Technology, London 1994, 1996.HMSO(e), A Study of UK Nationalised Industries, National Economic Development Office, London 1976.HMSO(g), Regional Trends 27-40, London, wyd. różne.HM Treasury, Budget 2002, Appendix C, London 2002.HM Treasury(a), The White Paper, The Nationalised Industries, London 1978.HM Treasury(b), Nationalised Industries: A Review of Economic and Financial Objectives, London 1967.Høj J., Kato T., Piłat D., Deregulation and Privatisation in the Service Sector, "OECD Economic Studies", No. 25, 1995.Hong D.S., Hsiu-Ying Lin, Moving from Foreign Technology to Indigenous Innovation - the Case of Chinese Taipei, referat na konferencję: Industrial Science & Technology Innovation - Policy Issues and Challenges in a Critical Era, Taipei, October, 2003.Hornstein A., Prescott E., The Firm and the Plant in General Equilibrium Theory, [w:] Becker R., Boldrin M., Jones R., Thomson W. (eds.), General Equilibrium, Growth and Trade, Vol. 2, San Diego Academic Press, 1993.Howells J. (ed.), Technology, Innovation and Competitiveness, E. Elgar, CheItenham 1997.Howells J., Innovation and Technology Transfer within Multinational Firms, [w:] Michie J., Smith J.G. (eds.), Globalization, Growth and Governance. Creating an Innovative Economy, Oxford University Press, 1998.Hurl B., Privatization and the Public Sector, Heinemann Educational, Oxford 1992.ICT Investment and Economic Growth in the 1990s: in the United States a Unique Case? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Countries, „STI Working Papers", No. 7, 2001.Imlah A.H., Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica, Harvard University Press, 1955.Institute of Employment Research, Labour Market Forecasts by Occupation & Education. The Forecasting Activities of Three European Labour Market Research Institutes, Kluwer Academic, 1999.International Federation of Stock Exchanges, Annual Report, 2000.International Monetary Fund, Annual Country Report, Washington 2002.Iwanek M., Wilkin J., Instytucje i instytucjonalizm w ekonomii, UW Warszawa 1997.Jasiński A.H., Innowacje i polityka innowacyjna, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Białystok 1997.Johansen L., Production Functions, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1972.Jorgenson D., Information Technology and G7 Economies, "The Economist", 23.10.2003.Kaldor N., Capitalism and Industrial Development: some lessons from Britain's experience, "Cambridge Journal of Economics", No. 1, 1977.Kaldor N., Technical Change in the Defence Industry, [w:] Pavitt K. (ed.), Technical Innov

Auditing scholarly journals published in Malaysia and assessing their visibility

The problem with the identification of Malaysian scholarly journals lies in the lack of a current and complete listing of journals published in Malaysia. As a result, librarians are deprived of a tool that can be used for journal selection and identification of gaps in their serials collection. This study describes the audit carried out on scholarly journals, with the objectives (a) to trace and characterized scholarly journal titles published in Malaysia, and (b) to determine their visibility in international and national indexing databases. A total of 464 titles were traced and their yearly trends, publisher and publishing characteristics, bibliometrics and indexation in national, international and subject-based indexes were described

Special Libraries, December 1961

Volume 52, Issue 10https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1961/1009/thumbnail.jp

Espacio universitario español en la Web (2010): estudio descriptivo de instituciones y productos académicos a través del análisis de subdominios y subdirectorios

A descriptive analysis of the Spanish university system on the Net during 2010 is presented, through the identification, collection and analysis of a sample of entities (and associated URLs), at both the level of universities and university units (classified into institutions and products). An analysis is made of the number of institutions with valid URLs suited for cybermetric analysis purposes and the type of URL syntax (subdomain or subdirectory). Likewise, multi-domain and redirection practices are detected. For units with an identifiable area of knowledge (faculties, schools, departments, and research groups, centers and institutes), a thematic analysis is also carried out. The results indicate that the Spanish academic space has a complex structure, with abundant redirection and multi-domain practices, with a predominance of subdirectories in institutions and subdomains in products, and where the natural sciences have -by number of associated entities and URLs - a major presence.Se presenta un análisis descriptivo del sistema universitario español en la Red durante 2010, mediante la identificación, recopilación y análisis de una muestra de entidades y URLs asociados, tanto a nivel de universidad como de unidades universitarias clasificadas en instituciones y productos. Se analiza la cantidad de instituciones con URL válida a efectos de análisis cibermétricos, el tipo de sintaxis de URL subdominio o subdirectorio, así como la detección de prácticas de multidominios y redireccionamientos. Para las unidades con área del conocimiento identificable facultades, escuelas, departamentos, y grupos, centros e institutos de investigación, se realiza igualmente un análisis temático. Los resultados indican que el espacio académico español tiene una estructura compleja, donde abundan las prácticas de redireccionamiento, multidominio, con un predominio de los subdirectorios en las instituciones y subdominios en los productos, y donde las ciencias naturales tienen, en número de entidades y URLs asociados, una presencia mayoritaria.Orduña Malea, E. (2013). Espacio universitario español en la Web (2010): estudio descriptivo de instituciones y productos académicos a través del análisis de subdominios y subdirectorios. Revista española de Documentación Científica. 36(3):1-21. doi:10.3989/redc.2013.3.958S121363Adecannby, J. (2011). Web link analysis of interrelationship between top ten African universities and world universities. Annals of Library and Information Studies, vol. 58, 128-138.Aguillo, I. F., Granadino, B., Ortega, J. L., & Prieto, J. A. (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1296-1302. doi:10.1002/asi.20433Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). The use of web search engines in information science research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 231-288. doi:10.1002/aris.1440380106Boudourides, M. A.; Sigrist, B.; Alevizos, P. D. (1999). Webometrics and the self-organization of the European information society. Rome Meeting of the SOEIS Project.Heimeriks, G., Hörlesberger, M., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2003). Scientometrics, 58(2), 391-413. doi:10.1023/a:1026296812830Kousha, K.; Horri, A. (2004). The relationship between scholarly publishing and the counts of academic inlinks to Iranian university Web sites: Exploring academic link creation motivations. Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics, vol. 1 (2), 13-22.Li, X. (2005). National and international university departmental Web site interlinking: a webometric analysis. University of Wolverhampton: Wolverhampton (UK).Martínez-Torres, M. D. R., Palacios-Florencio, B., Toral-Marín, S. L., & Barrero-García, F. J. (2011). Aplicación de algoritmos genéticos a la identificación de la estructura de enlaces en portales web. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 34(2), 232-252. doi:10.3989/redc.2011.2.779Noruzi, A. (2006). Web presence and impact factors for Middle-Eastern Countries. Online, vol. 30 (2), 22-28.Orduña-Malea, E., Serrano-Cobos, J., Ontalba-Ruipérez, J. A., & Lloret-Romero, N. (2010). Presencia y visibilidad web de las universidades públicas españolas. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 33(2), 246-278. doi:10.3989/redc.2010.2.740Orduña-Malea, E., Serrano-Cobos, J., & Lloret-Romero, N. (2009). Las universidades públicas españolas en Google Scholar: presencia y evolución de su publicación académica web. El Profesional de la Informacion, 18(5), 493-500. doi:10.3145/epi.2009.sep.02Ortega, José L. (2007). Visualización de la Web universitaria Europea: análisis cuantitativo de enlaces a través de técnicas cibermétricas. Madrid: Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Ortega, J.-L., & Aguillo, I. (2007). La web académica española en el contexto del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: estudio exploratorio. El Profesional de la Informacion, 16(5), 417-425. doi:10.3145/epi.2007.sep.03Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2008). Visualization of the Nordic academic web: Link analysis using social network tools. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1624-1633. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.010Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Análisis estructural de la web académica iberoamericana. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 32(3), 51-65. doi:10.3989/redc.2009.3.689Ortega, J. L., Aguillo, I., Cothey, V., & Scharnhorst, A. (2007). Maps of the academic web in the European Higher Education Area — an exploration of visual web indicators. Scientometrics, 74(2), 295-308. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0218-9Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Web-science communication in the age of globalization. New Media & Society, 8(4), 629-650. doi:10.1177/1461444806065660Pinto-Molina, M.; Alonso-Berrocal, J. L.; Cordón-García, J. A.; Fernández-Marcial, V.; García- Figuerola, C.; García-Marco, J.; Gómez-Camarero, C.; Zazo, Á. F.; Doucet, A. V. (2004). Análisis cualitativo de la visibilidad de la investigación de las universidades espa-olas a través de sus páginas web. Revista Espa-ola de Documentación Científica, vol. 27 (3), 345-370.Qiu, J., Chen, J., & Wang, Z. (2004). An analysis of backlink counts and Web Impact Factorsfor Chinese university websites. Scientometrics, 60(3), 463-473. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000034387.76981.83Smith, A., & Thelwall, M. (2002). Scientometrics, 54(3), 363-380. doi:10.1023/a:1016030415822Tang, R., & Thelwall, M. (2003). U.S. academic departmental Web-site interlinking in the United States Disciplinary differences. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 437-458. doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(03)00053-7Tang, R., & Thelwall, M. (2004). Patterns of national and international Web inlinks to US academic departments: An analysis of disciplinary variations. Scientometrics, 60(3), 475-485. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000034388.70594.ccThelwall, M. (2002). A comparison of sources of links for academic Web impact factor calculations. Journal of Documentation, 58(1), 66-78. doi:10.1108/00220410210425412Thelwall, M. (2002). An initial exploration of the link relationship between UK university Web sites. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 118-126. doi:10.1108/00012530210435248Thelwall, M. (2002). A research and institutional size‐based model for national university Web site interlinking. Journal of Documentation, 58(6), 683-694. doi:10.1108/00220410210448219Thelwall, M. (2003). Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics for academic web sites. Journal of Information Science, 29(1), 1-10. doi:10.1177/016555150302900101Thelwall, M. (2011). A comparison of link and URL citation counting. Aslib Proceedings, 63(4), 419-425. doi:10.1108/00012531111148985Thelwall, M.; Aguillo, I. F. (2003). La salud de las web universitarias espa-olas. Revista Espa-ola de Documentación Científica, vol. 26 (3), 291-305.Thelwall, M., Binns, R., Harries, G., Page-Kennedy, T., Price, L., & Wilkinson, D. (2002). Scientometrics, 53(1), 95-111. doi:10.1023/a:1014836021080Thelwall, M., Tang, R., & Price, L. (2003). Scientometrics, 56(3), 417-432. doi:10.1023/a:1022387105904Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2006). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 81-135. doi:10.1002/aris.1440390110Thomas, O., & Willett, P. (2000). Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science. Journal of Information Science, 26(6), 421-428. doi:10.1177/01655515000260060

Chemistry

published or submitted for publicatio

A single journal study : Malaysian Journal of Computer Science

Single journal studies are reviewed and measures used in the studies are highlighted. The following quantitative measures are used to study 272 articles published in Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, (1) the article productivity of the journal from 1985 to 2007, (2) the observed and expected authorship productivity tested using Lotka's Law of author productivity, identification and listing of core authors; (3) the authorship, co-authorship pattern by authors' country of origin and institutional affiliations; (4) the subject areas of research; (5) the citation analysis of resources referenced as well as the age and half-life of citations; the journals referenced and tested for zonal distribution using Bradford's law of journal scattering; the extent of web citations; and (6) the citations received by articles published in MJCS and impact factor of the journal based on information obtained from Google Scholar, the level of author and journal self-citation