259,781 research outputs found
An initial insight into Information Security Risk Assessment practices
Much of the debate surrounding risk management in information security (InfoSec) has been at the academic level, where the question of how practitioners view predominant issues is an essential element often left unexplored. Thus, this article represents an initial insight into how the InfoSec risk professionals see the InfoSec risk assessment (ISRA) field. We present the results of a 46-participant study where have gathered data regarding known issues in ISRA. The survey design was such that we collected both qualitative and quantitative data for analysis. One of the key contributions from the study is knowledge regarding how to handle risks at different organizational tiers, together with an insight into key roles and knowledge needed to conduct risk assessments. Also, we document several issues concerning the application of qualitative and quantitative methods, together with drawbacks and advantages. The findings of the analysis provides incentives to strengthen the research and scientific work for future research in InfoSec management
Barriers and Facilitators of Suicide Risk Assessment in Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives
Objective
To understand emergency department (ED) providersâ perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators of suicide risk assessment and to use these perspectives to inform recommendations for best practices in ED suicide risk assessment. Methods
Ninety-two ED providers from two hospital systems in a Midwestern state responded to open-ended questions via an online survey that assessed their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to assess suicide risk as well as their preferred assessment methods. Responses were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results
Qualitative analysis yielded six themes that impact suicide risk assessment. Time, privacy, collaboration and consultation with other professionals and integration of a standard screening protocol in routine care exemplified environmental and systemic themes. Patient engagement/participation in assessment and providersâ approach to communicating with patients and other providers also impacted the effectiveness of suicide risk assessment efforts. Conclusions
The findings inform feasible suicide risk assessment practices in EDs. Appropriately utilizing a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to assess suicide-related concerns appears to be a promising approach to ameliorate the burden placed on ED providers and facilitate optimal patient care. Recommendations for clinical care, education, quality improvement and research are offered
The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
This article arises from work by the Digital Curation Centre (DCC) Working Group examining mechanisms to roll out audit and certification services for digital repositories in the United Kingdom. Our attempt to develop a program for applying audit and certification processes and tools took as its starting point the RLG-NARA Audit Checklist for Certifying Digital Repositories. Our intention was to appraise critically the checklist and conceive a means of applying its mechanics within a diverse range of repository environments. We were struck by the realization that while a great deal of effort has been invested in determining the characteristics of a 'trusted digital repository', far less effort has concentrated on the ways in which the presence of the attributes can be demonstrated and their qualities measured. With this in mind we sought to explore the role of evidence within the certification process, and to identify examples of the types of evidence (e.g., documentary, observational, and testimonial) that might be desirable during the course of a repository audit.
The RFID PIA â developed by industry, agreed by regulators
This chapter discusses the privacy impact assessment (PIA) framework endorsed
by the European Commission on February 11th, 2011. This PIA, the first to receive the
Commission's endorsement, was developed to deal with privacy challenges associated with
the deployment of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, a key building block of
the Internet of Things. The goal of this chapter is to present the methodology and key
constructs of the RFID PIA Framework in more detail than was possible in the official text.
RFID operators can use this article as a support document when they conduct PIAs and need
to interpret the PIA Framework. The chapter begins with a history of why and how the PIA
Framework for RFID came about. It then proceeds with a description of the endorsed PIA
process for RFID applications and explains in detail how this process is supposed to function.
It provides examples discussed during the development of the PIA Framework. These
examples reflect the rationale behind and evolution of the text's methods and definitions. The
chapter also provides insight into the stakeholder debates and compromises that have
important implications for PIAs in general.Series: Working Papers on Information Systems, Information Business and Operation
Cyber Babel: Finding the Lingua Franca in Cybersecurity Regulation
Cybersecurity regulations have proliferated over the past few years as the significance of the threat has drawn more attention. With breaches making headlines, the public and their representatives are imposing requirements on those that hold sensitive data with renewed vigor. As high-value targets that hold large amounts of sensitive data, financial institutions are among the most heavily regulated. Regulations are necessary. However, regulations also come with costs that impact both large and small companies, their customers, and local, national, and international economies. As the regulations have proliferated so have those costs. The regulations will inevitably and justifiably diverge where different governments view the needs of their citizens differently. However, that should not prevent regulators from recognizing areas of agreement. This Note examines the regulatory regimes governing the data and cybersecurity practices of financial institutions implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Department of Financial Services, and the General Data Protection Regulations of the European Union to identify areas where requirements overlap, with the goal of suggesting implementations that promote consistency, clarity, and cost reduction
National Security Space Launch
The United States Space Forceâs National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program, formerly known as the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program, was first established in 1994 by President William J. Clintonâs National Space Transportation Policy. The policy assigned the responsibility for expendable launch vehicles to the Department of Defense (DoD), with the goals of lowering launch costs and ensuring national security access to space. As such, the United States Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) started the EELV program to acquire more affordable and reliable launch capability for valuable U.S. military satellites, such as national reconnaissance satellites that cost billions per satellite. In March 2019, the program name was changed from EELV to NSSL, which reflected several important features: 1.) The emphasis on âassured access to space,â 2.) transition from the Russian-made RD-180 rocket engine used on the Atlas V to a US-sourced engine (now scheduled to be complete by 2022), 3.) adaptation to manifest changes (such as enabling satellite swaps and return of manifest to normal operations both within 12 months of a need or an anomaly), and 4.) potential use of reusable launch vehicles. As of August 2019, Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, SpaceX, and United Launch Alliance (ULA) have all submitted proposals. From these, the U.S. Air Force will be selecting two companies to fulfill approximately 34 launches over a period of five years, beginning in 2022.
This paper will therefore first examine the objectives for the NSSL as presented in the 2017 National Security Strategy, Fiscal Year 2019, Fiscal Year 2020, and Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAA), and National Presidential Directive No. 40. The paper will then identify areas of potential weakness and gaps that exist in space launch programs as a whole and explore the security implications that impact the NSSL specifically. Finally, the paper will examine how the trajectory of the NSSL program could be adjusted in order to facilitate a smooth transition into new launch vehicles, while maintaining mission success, minimizing national security vulnerabilities, and clarifying the defense acquisition process.No embargoAcademic Major: EnglishAcademic Major: International Studie
- âŠ