Game semantic analysis of equivalence in IMJ

Using game semantics, we investigate the problem of verifying contextual equivalences in Interface Middleweight Java (IMJ), an imperative object calculus in which program phrases are typed using interfaces. Working in the setting where data types are non-recursive and restricted to finite domains, we identify the frontier between decidability and undecidability by reference to the structure of interfaces present in typing judgments. In particular, we show how to determine the decidability status of problem instances (over a fixed type signature) by examining the position of methods inside the term type and the types of its free identifiers. Our results build upon the recent fully abstract game semantics of IMJ. Decidability is proved by translation into visibly pushdown register automata over infinite alphabets with fresh-input recognition

Foundations of Object-Oriented Languages

A report on the workshop Foundations of Object-Oriented Languages, Paris, July 1994

Compilation and Equivalence of Imperative Objects (Revised Report)

We adopt the untyped imperative object calculus of Abadi andCardelli as a minimal setting in which to study problems of compilationand program equivalence that arise when compiling object orientedlanguages. We present both a big-step and a small-stepsubstitution-based operational semantics for the calculus. Our firsttwo results are theorems asserting the equivalence of our substitution based semantics with a closure-based semantics like that given by Abadi and Cardelli. Our third result is a direct proof of the correctness of compilation to a stack-based abstract machine via a small-step decompilation algorithm. Our fourth result is that contextual equivalence of objects coincides with a form of Mason and Talcott's CIUequivalence; the latter provides a tractable means of establishing operational equivalences. Finally, we prove correct an algorithm, used inour prototype compiler, for statically resolving method offsets. This isthe first study of correctness of an object-oriented abstract machine,and of operational equivalence for the imperative object calculus

08061 Abstracts Collection -- Types, Logics and Semantics for State

From 3 February to 8 February 2008, the Dagstuhl Seminar 08061 ``Types, Logics and Semantics for State\u27\u27 was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

ASPfun: A Functional and Distributed Object Calculus Semantics, Type-system, and Formalization

Several paradigms exist for distributed computing, this paper tries to provide a sound foundation for autonomous objects communicating in a very structured way. We define ASPfun, a calculus of functional objects, behaving autonomously, and communicating by a request-reply mechanism: requests are method calls handled asynchronously, futures represent awaited results for requests, and replies return the result of a request to an object that holds the corresponding future. This report first presents the ASPfun calculus and its semantics. Secondly we provide a type system for ASPfun, which ensure the ``progress'' property: while there is a request that is not reduced to a value, the computation can continue. ASPfun and its properties have been formalized and proved using the Isabelle theorem prover