9 research outputs found
On the complexity of partial derivatives
The method of partial derivatives is one of the most successful lower bound
methods for arithmetic circuits. It uses as a complexity measure the dimension
of the span of the partial derivatives of a polynomial. In this paper, we
consider this complexity measure as a computational problem: for an input
polynomial given as the sum of its nonzero monomials, what is the complexity of
computing the dimension of its space of partial derivatives? We show that this
problem is #P-hard and we ask whether it belongs to #P. We analyze the "trace
method", recently used in combinatorics and in algebraic complexity to lower
bound the rank of certain matrices. We show that this method provides a
polynomial-time computable lower bound on the dimension of the span of partial
derivatives, and from this method we derive closed-form lower bounds. We leave
as an open problem the existence of an approximation algorithm with reasonable
performance guarantees.A slightly shorter version of this paper was presented
at STACS'17. In this new version we have corrected a typo in Section 4.1, and
added a reference to Shitov's work on tensor rank
Sums of products of polynomials in few variables : lower bounds and polynomial identity testing
We study the complexity of representing polynomials as a sum of products of
polynomials in few variables. More precisely, we study representations of the
form such that each is
an arbitrary polynomial that depends on at most variables. We prove the
following results.
1. Over fields of characteristic zero, for every constant such that , we give an explicit family of polynomials , where
is of degree in variables, such that any
representation of the above type for with requires . This strengthens a recent result of Kayal and Saha
[KS14a] which showed similar lower bounds for the model of sums of products of
linear forms in few variables. It is known that any asymptotic improvement in
the exponent of the lower bounds (even for ) would separate VP
and VNP[KS14a].
2. We obtain a deterministic subexponential time blackbox polynomial identity
testing (PIT) algorithm for circuits computed by the above model when and
the individual degree of each variable in are at most and
for any constant . We get quasipolynomial running
time when . The PIT algorithm is obtained by combining our
lower bounds with the hardness-randomness tradeoffs developed in [DSY09, KI04].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nontrivial PIT algorithm for
this model (even for the case ), and the first nontrivial PIT algorithm
obtained from lower bounds for small depth circuits
Multi-k-ic depth three circuit lower bound
Abstract In a multi-k-ic depth three circuit every variable appears in at most k of the linear polynomials in every product gate of the circuit. This model is a natural generalization of multilinear depth three circuits that allows the formal degree of the circuit to exceed the number of underlying variables (as the formal degree of a multi-k-ic depth three circuit can be kn where n is the number of variables). The problem of proving lower bounds for depth three circuits with high formal degree has gained in importance following a work by Gupta, Kamath, Kayal and Saptharishi [GKKS13a] on depth reduction to high formal degree depth three circuits. In this work, we show an exponential lower bound for multi-k-ic depth three circuits for any arbitrary constant k
AN EXPONENTIAL LOWER BOUND FOR HOMOGENEOUS DEPTH FOUR ARITHMETIC FORMULAS
We show here a 2(Omega(root d center dot logN)) size lower bound for homogeneous depth four arithmetic formulas over fields of characteristic zero. That is, we give an explicit family of polynomials of degree d on N variables (with N = d(3) in our case) with 0, 1-coefficients such that for any representation of a polynomial f in this family of the form f = Sigma(i)Pi(j)Q(ij), where the Q(ij)'s are homogeneous polynomials (recall that a polynomial is said to be homogeneous if all its monomials have the same degree), it must hold that Sigma(i,j) (number of monomials of Q(ij)) >= 2(Omega(root d center dot logN)). The abovementioned family, which we refer to as the Nisan-Wigderson design-based family of polynomials, is in the complexity class VNP. Our work builds on recent lower bound results and yields an improved quantitative bound as compared to the quasi-polynomial lower bound of [N. Kayal et al., in Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, New York, 2014, pp. 119-127] and the N-Omega(log logN) lower bound in the independent work of [M. Kumar and S. Saraf, in Automata, Languages, and Programming, Part I, Springer, Berlin, 2014, pp. 751-762]
An Exponential Lower Bound for Homogeneous Depth Four Arithmetic Formulas
We show here a 2(Omega(root d.log N)) size lower bound for homogeneous depth four arithmetic formulas. That is, we give an explicit family of polynomials of degree d on N variables (with N = d(3) in our case) with 0, 1-coefficients such that for any representation of a polynomial f in this family of the form f = Sigma(i) Pi(j) Q(ij), where the Q(ij)'s are homogeneous polynomials (recall that a polynomial is said to be homogeneous if all its monomials have the same degree), it must hold that Sigma(i,j) (Number of monomials of Q(ij)) >= 2(Omega(root d.log N)). The above mentioned family, which we refer to as the Nisan-Wigderson design-based family of polynomials, is in the complexity class VNP. Our work builds on the recent lower bound results 1], 2], 3], 4], 5] and yields an improved quantitative bound as compared to the quasi-polynomial lower bound of 6] and the N-Omega(log log (N)) lower bound in the independent work of 7]
On the size of homogeneous and of depth four formulas with low individual degree
International audienceLet r ≥ 1 be an integer. Let us call a polynomial f (x_1,...,x_N) ∈ F[x] as a multi-r-ic polynomial if the degree of f with respect to any variable is at most r (this generalizes the notion of multilinear polynomials). We investigate arithmetic circuits in which the output is syntactically forced to be a multi-r-ic polynomial and refer to these as multi-r-ic circuits. We prove lower bounds for several subclasses of such circuits. Specifically, first define the formal degree of a node α with respect to a variable x_i inductively as follows. For a leaf α it is 1 if α is labelled with x_i and zero otherwise; for an internal node α labelled with × (respectively +) it is the sum of (respectively the maximum of) the formal degrees of the children with respect to x_i. We call an arithmetic circuit as a multi-r-ic circuit if the formal degree of the output node with respect to any variable is at most r. We prove lower bounds for various subclasses of multi-r-ic circuits