1,757 research outputs found

    Self-Synchronization in Duty-cycled Internet of Things (IoT) Applications

    Full text link
    In recent years, the networks of low-power devices have gained popularity. Typically these devices are wireless and interact to form large networks such as the Machine to Machine (M2M) networks, Internet of Things (IoT), Wearable Computing, and Wireless Sensor Networks. The collaboration among these devices is a key to achieving the full potential of these networks. A major problem in this field is to guarantee robust communication between elements while keeping the whole network energy efficient. In this paper, we introduce an extended and improved emergent broadcast slot (EBS) scheme, which facilitates collaboration for robust communication and is energy efficient. In the EBS, nodes communication unit remains in sleeping mode and are awake just to communicate. The EBS scheme is fully decentralized, that is, nodes coordinate their wake-up window in partially overlapped manner within each duty-cycle to avoid message collisions. We show the theoretical convergence behavior of the scheme, which is confirmed through real test-bed experimentation.Comment: 12 Pages, 11 Figures, Journa

    Distributed Object Tracking Using a Cluster-Based Kalman Filter in Wireless Camera Networks

    Get PDF
    Local data aggregation is an effective means to save sensor node energy and prolong the lifespan of wireless sensor networks. However, when a sensor network is used to track moving objects, the task of local data aggregation in the network presents a new set of challenges, such as the necessity to estimate, usually in real time, the constantly changing state of the target based on information acquired by the nodes at different time instants. To address these issues, we propose a distributed object tracking system which employs a cluster-based Kalman filter in a network of wireless cameras. When a target is detected, cameras that can observe the same target interact with one another to form a cluster and elect a cluster head. Local measurements of the target acquired by members of the cluster are sent to the cluster head, which then estimates the target position via Kalman filtering and periodically transmits this information to a base station. The underlying clustering protocol allows the current state and uncertainty of the target position to be easily handed off among clusters as the object is being tracked. This allows Kalman filter-based object tracking to be carried out in a distributed manner. An extended Kalman filter is necessary since measurements acquired by the cameras are related to the actual position of the target by nonlinear transformations. In addition, in order to take into consideration the time uncertainty in the measurements acquired by the different cameras, it is necessary to introduce nonlinearity in the system dynamics. Our object tracking protocol requires the transmission of significantly fewer messages than a centralized tracker that naively transmits all of the local measurements to the base station. It is also more accurate than a decentralized tracker that employs linear interpolation for local data aggregation. Besides, the protocol is able to perform real-time estimation because our implementation takes into consideration the sparsit- - y of the matrices involved in the problem. The experimental results show that our distributed object tracking protocol is able to achieve tracking accuracy comparable to the centralized tracking method, while requiring a significantly smaller number of message transmissions in the network

    Energy aware and privacy preserving protocols for ad hoc networks with applications to disaster management

    Get PDF
    Disasters can have a serious impact on the functioning of communities and societies. Disaster management aims at providing efficient utilization of resources during pre-disaster (e.g. preparedness and prevention) and post-disaster (e.g. recovery and relief) scenarios to reduce the impact of disasters. Wireless sensors have been extensively used for early detection and prevention of disasters. However, the sensor\u27s operating environment may not always be congenial to these applications. Attackers can observe the traffic flow in the network to determine the location of the sensors and exploit it. For example, in intrusion detection systems, the information can be used to identify coverage gaps and avoid detection. Data source location privacy preservation protocols were designed in this work to address this problem. Using wireless sensors for disaster preparedness, recovery and relief operations can have high deployment costs. Making use of wireless devices (e.g. smartphones and tablets) widely available among people in the affected region is a more practical approach. Disaster preparedness involves dissemination of information among the people to make them aware of the risks they will face in the event of a disaster and how to actively prepare for them. The content is downloaded by the people on their smartphones and tablets for ubiquitous access. As these devices are primarily constrained by their available energy, this work introduces an energy-aware peer-to-peer file sharing protocol for efficient distribution of the content and maximizing the lifetime of the devices. Finally, the ability of the wireless devices to build an ad hoc network for capturing and collecting data for disaster relief and recovery operations was investigated. Specifically, novel energy-adaptive mechanisms were designed for autonomous creation of the ad hoc network, distribution of data capturing task among the devices, and collection of data with minimum delay --Abstract, page iii

    Routing Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review

    Get PDF
    With the advances in micro-electronics, wireless sensor gadgets have been made substantially littler and more coordinated, and large-scale wireless sensor networks (WSNs) based the participation among the noteworthy measure of nodes have turned into a hotly debated issue. "Large-scale" implies for the most part large region or high thickness of a system. As needs be the routing protocols must scale well to the system scope augmentation and node thickness increments. A sensor node is regularly energy-constrained and can't be energized, and in this manner its energy utilization has a very critical impact on the adaptability of the protocol. To the best of our insight, at present the standard strategies to tackle the energy issue in large-scale WSNs are the various leveled routing protocols. In a progressive routing protocol, every one of the nodes are separated into a few gatherings with various task levels. The nodes inside the abnormal state are in charge of data aggregation and administration work, and the low level nodes for detecting their environment and gathering data. The progressive routing protocols are ended up being more energy-proficient than level ones in which every one of the nodes assume a similar part, particularly as far as the data aggregation and the flooding of the control bundles. With concentrate on the various leveled structure, in this paper we give an understanding into routing protocols planned particularly for large-scale WSNs. As per the distinctive goals, the protocols are by and large ordered in light of various criteria, for example, control overhead decrease, energy utilization mitigation and energy adjust. Keeping in mind the end goal to pick up a thorough comprehension of every protocol, we feature their imaginative thoughts, portray the basic standards in detail and break down their points of interest and hindrances. Also a correlation of each routing protocol is led to exhibit the contrasts between the protocols as far as message unpredictability, memory necessities, localization, data aggregation, bunching way and different measurements. At last some open issues in routing protocol plan in large-scale wireless sensor networks and conclusions are proposed

    Routing Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review

    Get PDF
    With the advances in micro-electronics, wireless sensor gadgets have been made substantially littler and more coordinated, and large-scale wireless sensor networks (WSNs) based the participation among the noteworthy measure of nodes have turned into a hotly debated issue. "Large-scale" implies for the most part large region or high thickness of a system. As needs be the routing protocols must scale well to the system scope augmentation and node thickness increments. A sensor node is regularly energy-constrained and can't be energized, and in this manner its energy utilization has a very critical impact on the adaptability of the protocol. To the best of our insight, at present the standard strategies to tackle the energy issue in large-scale WSNs are the various leveled routing protocols. In a progressive routing protocol, every one of the nodes are separated into a few gatherings with various task levels. The nodes inside the abnormal state are in charge of data aggregation and administration work, and the low level nodes for detecting their environment and gathering data. The progressive routing protocols are ended up being more energy-proficient than level ones in which every one of the nodes assume a similar part, particularly as far as the data aggregation and the flooding of the control bundles. With concentrate on the various leveled structure, in this paper we give an understanding into routing protocols planned particularly for large-scale WSNs. As per the distinctive goals, the protocols are by and large ordered in light of various criteria, for example, control overhead decrease, energy utilization mitigation and energy adjust. Keeping in mind the end goal to pick up a thorough comprehension of every protocol, we feature their imaginative thoughts, portray the basic standards in detail and break down their points of interest and hindrances. Also a correlation of each routing protocol is led to exhibit the contrasts between the protocols as far as message unpredictability, memory necessities, localization, data aggregation, bunching way and different measurements. At last some open issues in routing protocol plan in large-scale wireless sensor networks and conclusions are proposed

    A Survey on Routing Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks

    Get PDF
    With the advances in micro-electronics, wireless sensor devices have been made much smaller and more integrated, and large-scale wireless sensor networks (WSNs) based the cooperation among the significant amount of nodes have become a hot topic. “Large-scale” means mainly large area or high density of a network. Accordingly the routing protocols must scale well to the network scope extension and node density increases. A sensor node is normally energy-limited and cannot be recharged, and thus its energy consumption has a quite significant effect on the scalability of the protocol. To the best of our knowledge, currently the mainstream methods to solve the energy problem in large-scale WSNs are the hierarchical routing protocols. In a hierarchical routing protocol, all the nodes are divided into several groups with different assignment levels. The nodes within the high level are responsible for data aggregation and management work, and the low level nodes for sensing their surroundings and collecting information. The hierarchical routing protocols are proved to be more energy-efficient than flat ones in which all the nodes play the same role, especially in terms of the data aggregation and the flooding of the control packets. With focus on the hierarchical structure, in this paper we provide an insight into routing protocols designed specifically for large-scale WSNs. According to the different objectives, the protocols are generally classified based on different criteria such as control overhead reduction, energy consumption mitigation and energy balance. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of each protocol, we highlight their innovative ideas, describe the underlying principles in detail and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover a comparison of each routing protocol is conducted to demonstrate the differences between the protocols in terms of message complexity, memory requirements, localization, data aggregation, clustering manner and other metrics. Finally some open issues in routing protocol design in large-scale wireless sensor networks and conclusions are proposed

    Mesh based and Hybrid Multicast routing protocols for MANETs: Current State of the art

    Get PDF
    This paper discusses various multicast routing protocols which are proposed in the recent past each having its own unique characteristic, with a motive of providing a complete understanding of these multicast routing protocols and present the scope of future research in this field. Further, the paper specifically discusses the current development in the development of mesh based and hybrid multicasting routing protocols. The study of this paper addresses the solution of most difficult task in Multicast routing protocols for MANETs under host mobility which causes multi-hop routing which is even more severe with bandwidth limitations. The Multicast routing plays a substantial part in MANETs
    • …
    corecore