QoS Analysis for a Non-Preemptive Continuous Monitoring and Event Driven WSN Protocol in Mobile Environments

Evolution in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has allowed the introduction of new applications with increased complexity regarding communication protocols, which have to ensure that certain QoS parameters are met. Specifically, mobile applications require the system to respond in a certain manner in order to adequately track the target object. Hybrid algorithms that perform Continuous Monitoring (CntM) and Event-Driven (ED) duties have proven their ability to enhance performance in different environments, where emergency alarms are required. In this paper, several types of environments are studied using mathematical models and simulations, for evaluating the performance of WALTER, a priority-based nonpreemptive hybrid WSN protocol that aims to reduce delay and packet loss probability in time-critical packets. First, randomly distributed events are considered. This environment can be used to model a wide variety of physical phenomena, for which report delay and energy consumption are analyzed by means of Markov models. Then, mobile-only environments are studied for object tracking purposes. Here, some of the parameters that determine the performance of the system are identified. Finally, an environment containing mobile objects and randomly distributed events is considered. It is shown that by assigning high priority to time-critical packets, report delay is reduced and network performance is enhanced.This work was partially supported by CONACyT under Project 183370. The research of Vicent Pla has been supported in part by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain under Grant TIN2013-47272-C2-1-R.Leyva Mayorga, I.; Rivero-Angeles, ME.; Carreto-Arellano, C.; Pla, V. (2015). QoS Analysis for a Non-Preemptive Continuous Monitoring and Event Driven WSN Protocol in Mobile Environments. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/471307S1162015Arampatzis, T., Lygeros, J., & Manesis, S. (s. f.). A Survey of Applications of Wireless Sensors and Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation Intelligent Control, 2005. doi:10.1109/.2005.1467103Ramachandran, C., Misra, S., & Obaidat, M. S. (2008). A probabilistic zonal approach for swarm-inspired wildfire detection using sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 21(10), 1047-1073. doi:10.1002/dac.937Misra, S., Singh, S., Khatua, M., & Obaidat, M. S. (2013). Extracting mobility pattern from target trajectory in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(2), 213-230. doi:10.1002/dac.2649Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660-670. doi:10.1109/twc.2002.804190Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (s. f.). Distributed clustering in ad-hoc sensor networks: a hybrid, energy-efficient approach. IEEE INFOCOM 2004. doi:10.1109/infcom.2004.1354534Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (s. f.). TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2001. doi:10.1109/ipdps.2001.925197Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2002). APTEEN: a hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless. Proceedings 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. doi:10.1109/ipdps.2002.1016600Sharif, A., Potdar, V., & Rathnayaka, A. J. D. (2010). Prioritizing Information for Achieving QoS Control in WSN. 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications. doi:10.1109/aina.2010.166Alappat, V. J., Khanna, N., & Krishna, A. K. (2011). Advanced Sensor MAC protocol to support applications having different priority levels in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2011 6th International ICST Conference on Communications and Networking in China (CHINACOM). doi:10.1109/chinacom.2011.6158175Alam, K. M., Kamruzzaman, J., Karmakar, G., & Murshed, M. (2012). Priority Sensitive Event Detection in Hybrid Wireless Sensor Networks. 2012 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN). doi:10.1109/icccn.2012.6289220Raja, A., & Su, X. (2008). A Mobility Adaptive Hybrid Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. 2008 5th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. doi:10.1109/ccnc08.2007.159Srikanth, B., Harish, M., & Bhattacharjee, R. (2011). An energy efficient hybrid MAC protocol for WSN containing mobile nodes. 2011 8th International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing. doi:10.1109/icics.2011.6173629Lee, Y.-D., Jeong, D.-U., & Lee, H.-J. (2011). Empirical analysis of the reliability of low-rate wireless u-healthcare monitoring applications. International Journal of Communication Systems, 26(4), 505-514. doi:10.1002/dac.1360Deepak, K. S., & Babu, A. V. (2013). Improving energy efficiency of incremental relay based cooperative communications in wireless body area networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(1), 91-111. doi:10.1002/dac.2641Yuan Li, Wei Ye, & Heidemann, J. (s. f.). Energy and latency control in low duty cycle MAC protocols. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005. doi:10.1109/wcnc.2005.1424589Bianchi, G. (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), 535-547. doi:10.1109/49.840210Wei Ye, Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (s. f.). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. doi:10.1109/infcom.2002.101940

An Energy Aware and Secure MAC Protocol for Tackling Denial of Sleep Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless sensor networks which form part of the core for the Internet of Things consist of resource constrained sensors that are usually powered by batteries. Therefore, careful energy awareness is essential when working with these devices. Indeed,the introduction of security techniques such as authentication and encryption, to ensure confidentiality and integrity of data, can place higher energy load on the sensors. However, the absence of security protection c ould give room for energy drain attacks such as denial of sleep attacks which have a higher negative impact on the life span ( of the sensors than the presence of security features. This thesis, therefore, focuses on tackling denial of sleep attacks from two perspectives A security perspective and an energy efficiency perspective. The security perspective involves evaluating and ranking a number of security based techniques to curbing denial of sleep attacks. The energy efficiency perspective, on the other hand, involves exploring duty cycling and simulating three Media Access Control ( protocols Sensor MAC, Timeout MAC andTunableMAC under different network sizes and measuring different parameters such as the Received Signal Strength RSSI) and Link Quality Indicator ( Transmit power, throughput and energy efficiency Duty cycling happens to be one of the major techniques for conserving energy in wireless sensor networks and this research aims to answer questions with regards to the effect of duty cycles on the energy efficiency as well as the throughput of three duty cycle protocols Sensor MAC ( Timeout MAC ( and TunableMAC in addition to creating a novel MAC protocol that is also more resilient to denial of sleep a ttacks than existing protocols. The main contributions to knowledge from this thesis are the developed framework used for evaluation of existing denial of sleep attack solutions and the algorithms which fuel the other contribution to knowledge a newly developed protocol tested on the Castalia Simulator on the OMNET++ platform. The new protocol has been compared with existing protocols and has been found to have significant improvement in energy efficiency and also better resilience to denial of sleep at tacks Part of this research has been published Two conference publications in IEEE Explore and one workshop paper

Machine Learning in Wireless Sensor Networks: Algorithms, Strategies, and Applications

Wireless sensor networks monitor dynamic environments that change rapidly over time. This dynamic behavior is either caused by external factors or initiated by the system designers themselves. To adapt to such conditions, sensor networks often adopt machine learning techniques to eliminate the need for unnecessary redesign. Machine learning also inspires many practical solutions that maximize resource utilization and prolong the lifespan of the network. In this paper, we present an extensive literature review over the period 2002-2013 of machine learning methods that were used to address common issues in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). The advantages and disadvantages of each proposed algorithm are evaluated against the corresponding problem. We also provide a comparative guide to aid WSN designers in developing suitable machine learning solutions for their specific application challenges.Comment: Accepted for publication in IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial

A critical analysis of research potential, challenges and future directives in industrial wireless sensor networks

In recent years, Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSNs) have emerged as an important research theme with applications spanning a wide range of industries including automation, monitoring, process control, feedback systems and automotive. Wide scope of IWSNs applications ranging from small production units, large oil and gas industries to nuclear fission control, enables a fast-paced research in this field. Though IWSNs offer advantages of low cost, flexibility, scalability, self-healing, easy deployment and reformation, yet they pose certain limitations on available potential and introduce challenges on multiple fronts due to their susceptibility to highly complex and uncertain industrial environments. In this paper a detailed discussion on design objectives, challenges and solutions, for IWSNs, are presented. A careful evaluation of industrial systems, deadlines and possible hazards in industrial atmosphere are discussed. The paper also presents a thorough review of the existing standards and industrial protocols and gives a critical evaluation of potential of these standards and protocols along with a detailed discussion on available hardware platforms, specific industrial energy harvesting techniques and their capabilities. The paper lists main service providers for IWSNs solutions and gives insight of future trends and research gaps in the field of IWSNs

Efficient Mobile Data Collection with Mobile Collect

WISENET (NES)PromosCONE