5 research outputs found

    An adaptive multi-swarm optimizer for dynamic optimization problems

    Get PDF
    The multi-population method has been widely used to solve dynamic optimization problems (DOPs) with the aim of maintaining multiple populations on different peaks to locate and track multiple changing optima simultaneously. However, to make this approach effective for solving DOPs, two challenging issues need to be addressed. They are how to adapt the number of populations to changes and how to adaptively maintain the population diversity in a situation where changes are complicated or hard to detect or predict. Tracking the changing global optimum in dynamic environments is difficult because we cannot know when and where changes occur and what the characteristics of changes would be. Therefore, it is necessary to take the challenging issues into account to design such adaptive algorithms. To address the issues when multi-population methods are applied for solving DOPs, this paper proposes an adaptive multi-swarm algorithm, where the populations are enabled to be adaptive in dynamic environments without change detection. An experimental study is conducted based on the moving peaks problem to investigate the behavior of the proposed method. The performance of the proposed algorithm is also compared with a set of algorithms that are based on multi-population methods from different research areas in the literature of evolutionary computation

    Multi-population methods in unconstrained continuous dynamic environments: The challenges

    Get PDF
    Themulti-populationmethod has been widely used to solve unconstrained continuous dynamic optimization problems with the aim of maintaining multiple populations on different peaks to locate and track multiple changing peaks simultaneously. However, to make this approach efficient, several crucial challenging issues need to be addressed, e.g., how to determine the moment to react to changes, how to adapt the number of populations to changing environments, and how to determine the search area of each population. In addition, several other issues, e.g., communication between populations, overlapping search, the way to create multiple populations, detection of changes, and local search operators, should be also addressed. The lack of attention on these challenging issues within multi-population methods hinders the development of multi-population based algorithms in dynamic environments. In this paper, these challenging issues are comprehensively analyzed by a set of experimental studies from the algorithm design point of view. Experimental studies based on a set of popular algorithms show that the performance of algorithms is significantly affected by these challenging issues on the moving peaks benchmark. Keywords: Multi-population methods, dynamic optimization problems, evolutionary computatio

    A survey of multi-population optimization algorithms for tracking the moving optimum in dynamic environments

    Get PDF
    The solution spaces of many real-world optimization problems change over time. Such problems are called dynamic optimization problems (DOPs), which pose unique challenges that necessitate adaptive strategies from optimization algorithms to maintain optimal performance and responsiveness to environmental changes. Tracking the moving optimum (TMO) is an important class of DOPs where the goal is to identify and deploy the best-found solution in each environments Multi-population dynamic optimization algorithms are particularly effective at solving TMOs due to their flexible structures and potential for adaptability. These algorithms are usually complex methods that are built by assembling multiple components, each of which is responsible for addressing a specific challenge or improving the tracking performance in response to changes. This survey provides an in-depth review of multi-population dynamic optimization algorithms, focusing on describing these algorithms as a set of multiple cooperating components, the synergy between these components, and their collective effectiveness and/or efficiency in addressing the challenges of TMOs. Additionally, this survey reviews benchmarking practices within this domain and outlines promising directions for future research

    DYNAMIC MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION USING EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS

    Get PDF
    Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

    Evolutionary Algorithms for Static and Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization

    Get PDF
    Many real-world optimization problems consist of a number of conflicting objectives that have to be optimized simultaneously. Due to the presence of multiple conflicting ob- jectives, there is no single solution that can optimize all the objectives. Therefore, the resulting multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) resort to a set of trade-off op- timal solutions, called the Pareto set in the decision space and the Pareto front in the objective space. Traditional optimization methods can at best find one solution in a sin- gle run, thereby making them inefficient to solve MOPs. In contrast, evolutionary algo- rithms (EAs) are able to approximate multiple optimal solutions in a single run. This strength makes EAs good candidates for solving MOPs. Over the past several decades, there have been increasing research interests in developing EAs or improving their perfor- mance, resulting in a large number of contributions towards the applicability of EAs for MOPs. However, the performance of EAs depends largely on the properties of the MOPs in question, e.g., static/dynamic optimization environments, simple/complex Pareto front characteristics, and low/high dimensionality. Different problem properties may pose dis- tinct optimization difficulties to EAs. For example, dynamic (time-varying) MOPs are generally more challenging than static ones to EAs. Therefore, it is not trivial to further study EAs in order to make them widely applicable to MOPs with various optimization scenarios or problem properties. This thesis is devoted to exploring EAs’ ability to solve a variety of MOPs with dif- ferent problem characteristics, attempting to widen EAs’ applicability and enhance their general performance. To start with, decomposition-based EAs are enhanced by incorpo- rating two-phase search and niche-guided solution selection strategies so as to make them suitable for solving MOPs with complex Pareto fronts. Second, new scalarizing functions are proposed and their impacts on evolutionary multiobjective optimization are exten- sively studied. On the basis of the new scalarizing functions, an efficient decomposition- based EA is introduced to deal with a class of hard MOPs. Third, a diversity-first- and-convergence-second sorting method is suggested to handle possible drawbacks of convergence-first based sorting methods. The new sorting method is then combined with strength based fitness assignment, with the aid of reference directions, to optimize MOPs with an increase of objective dimensionality. After that, we study the field of dynamic multiobjective optimization where objective functions and constraints can change over time. A new set of test problems consisting of a wide range of dynamic characteristics is introduced at an attempt to standardize test environments in dynamic multiobjective optimization, thereby aiding fair algorithm comparison and deep performance analysis. Finally, a dynamic EA is developed to tackle dynamic MOPs by exploiting the advan- tages of both generational and steady-state algorithms. All the proposed approaches have been extensively examined against existing state-of-the-art methods, showing fairly good performance in a variety of test scenarios. The research work presented in the thesis is the output of initiative and novel attempts to tackle some challenging issues in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. This re- search has not only extended the applicability of some of the existing approaches, such as decomposition-based or Pareto-based algorithms, for complex or hard MOPs, but also contributed to moving forward research in the field of dynamic multiobjective optimiza- tion with novel ideas including new test suites and novel algorithm design
    corecore