72 research outputs found

    Almost partitioning the hypercube into copies of a graph

    Get PDF
    Let H be an induced subgraph of the hypercube Qk, for some k. We show that for some c=c(H), the vertices of Qn can be partitioned into induced copies of H and a remainder of at most O(nc) vertices. We also show that the error term cannot be replaced by anything smaller than log

    Almost partitioning the hypercube into copies of a graph

    Get PDF
    Let H be an induced subgraph of the hypercube Qk, for some k. We show that for some c=c(H), the vertices of Qn can be partitioned into induced copies of H and a remainder of at most O(nc) vertices. We also show that the error term cannot be replaced by anything smaller than log

    A survey of the higher Stasheff-Tamari orders

    Get PDF

    Subject Index Volumes 1–200

    Get PDF

    Computational complexity of counting coincidences

    Full text link
    Can you decide if there is a coincidence in the numbers counting two different combinatorial objects? For example, can you decide if two regions in R3\mathbb{R}^3 have the same number of domino tilings? There are two versions of the problem, with 2×1×12\times 1 \times 1 and 2×2×12\times 2 \times 1 boxes. We prove that in both cases the coincidence problem is not in the polynomial hierarchy unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to a finite level. While the conclusions are the same, the proofs are notably different and generalize in different directions. We proceed to explore the coincidence problem for counting independent sets and matchings in graphs, matroid bases, order ideals and linear extensions in posets, permutation patterns, and the Kronecker coefficients. We also make a number of conjectures for counting other combinatorial objects such as plane triangulations, contingency tables, standard Young tableaux, reduced factorizations and the Littlewood--Richardson coefficients.Comment: 23 pages, 6 figure

    Non-commutative Stone duality: inverse semigroups, topological groupoids and C*-algebras

    Full text link
    We study a non-commutative generalization of Stone duality that connects a class of inverse semigroups, called Boolean inverse ∧\wedge-semigroups, with a class of topological groupoids, called Hausdorff Boolean groupoids. Much of the paper is given over to showing that Boolean inverse ∧\wedge-semigroups arise as completions of inverse semigroups we call pre-Boolean. An inverse ∧\wedge-semigroup is pre-Boolean if and only if every tight filter is an ultrafilter, where the definition of a tight filter is obtained by combining work of both Exel and Lenz. A simple necessary condition for a semigroup to be pre-Boolean is derived and a variety of examples of inverse semigroups are shown to satisfy it. Thus the polycyclic inverse monoids, and certain Rees matrix semigroups over the polycyclics, are pre-Boolean and it is proved that the groups of units of their completions are precisely the Thompson-Higman groups Gn,rG_{n,r}. The inverse semigroups arising from suitable directed graphs are also pre-Boolean and the topological groupoids arising from these graph inverse semigroups under our non-commutative Stone duality are the groupoids that arise from the Cuntz-Krieger C∗C^{\ast}-algebras.Comment: The presentation has been sharpened up and some minor errors correcte
    • …
    corecore