56,592 research outputs found
Algebraic Proofs over Noncommutative Formulas
AbstractWe study possible formulations of algebraic propositional proof systems operating with noncommutative formulas. We observe that a simple formulation gives rise to systems at least as strong as Frege, yielding a semantic way to define a Cook–Reckhow (i.e., polynomially verifiable) algebraic analog of Frege proofs, different from that given in Buss et al. (1997) and Grigoriev and Hirsch (2003). We then turn to an apparently weaker system, namely, polynomial calculus (PC) where polynomials are written as ordered formulas (PC over ordered formulas, for short). Given some fixed linear order on variables, an arithmetic formula is ordered if for each of its product gates the left subformula contains only variables that are less-than or equal, according to the linear order, than the variables in the right subformula of the gate. We show that PC over ordered formulas (when the base field is of zero characteristic) is strictly stronger than resolution, polynomial calculus and polynomial calculus with resolution (PCR), and admits polynomial-size refutations for the pigeonhole principle and Tseitinʼs formulas. We conclude by proposing an approach for establishing lower bounds on PC over ordered formulas proofs, and related systems, based on properties of lower bounds on noncommutative formulas (Nisan, 1991).The motivation behind this work is developing techniques incorporating rank arguments (similar to those used in arithmetic circuit complexity) for establishing lower bounds on propositional proofs
Applications of the Brauer complex: card shuffling, permutation statistics, and dynamical systems
By algebraic group theory, there is a map from the semisimple conjugacy
classes of a finite group of Lie type to the conjugacy classes of the Weyl
group. Picking a semisimple class uniformly at random yields a probability
measure on conjugacy classes of the Weyl group. Using the Brauer complex, it is
proved that this measure agrees with a second measure on conjugacy classes of
the Weyl group induced by a construction of Cellini using the affine Weyl
group. Formulas for Cellini's measure in type are found. This leads to new
models of card shuffling and has interesting combinatorial and number theoretic
consequences. An analysis of type C gives another solution to a problem of
Rogers in dynamical systems: the enumeration of unimodal permutations by cycle
structure. The proof uses the factorization theory of palindromic polynomials
over finite fields. Contact is made with symmetric function theory.Comment: One change: we fix a typo in definition of f(m,k,i,d) on page 1
An Abstract Approach to Consequence Relations
We generalise the Blok-J\'onsson account of structural consequence relations,
later developed by Galatos, Tsinakis and other authors, in such a way as to
naturally accommodate multiset consequence. While Blok and J\'onsson admit, in
place of sheer formulas, a wider range of syntactic units to be manipulated in
deductions (including sequents or equations), these objects are invariably
aggregated via set-theoretical union. Our approach is more general in that
non-idempotent forms of premiss and conclusion aggregation, including multiset
sum and fuzzy set union, are considered. In their abstract form, thus,
deductive relations are defined as additional compatible preorderings over
certain partially ordered monoids. We investigate these relations using
categorical methods, and provide analogues of the main results obtained in the
general theory of consequence relations. Then we focus on the driving example
of multiset deductive relations, providing variations of the methods of matrix
semantics and Hilbert systems in Abstract Algebraic Logic
On the Power and Limitations of Branch and Cut
The Stabbing Planes proof system [Paul Beame et al., 2018] was introduced to model the reasoning carried out in practical mixed integer programming solvers. As a proof system, it is powerful enough to simulate Cutting Planes and to refute the Tseitin formulas - certain unsatisfiable systems of linear equations od 2 - which are canonical hard examples for many algebraic proof systems. In a recent (and surprising) result, Dadush and Tiwari [Daniel Dadush and Samarth Tiwari, 2020] showed that these short refutations of the Tseitin formulas could be translated into quasi-polynomial size and depth Cutting Planes proofs, refuting a long-standing conjecture. This translation raises several interesting questions. First, whether all Stabbing Planes proofs can be efficiently simulated by Cutting Planes. This would allow for the substantial analysis done on the Cutting Planes system to be lifted to practical mixed integer programming solvers. Second, whether the quasi-polynomial depth of these proofs is inherent to Cutting Planes.
In this paper we make progress towards answering both of these questions. First, we show that any Stabbing Planes proof with bounded coefficients (SP*) can be translated into Cutting Planes. As a consequence of the known lower bounds for Cutting Planes, this establishes the first exponential lower bounds on SP*. Using this translation, we extend the result of Dadush and Tiwari to show that Cutting Planes has short refutations of any unsatisfiable system of linear equations over a finite field. Like the Cutting Planes proofs of Dadush and Tiwari, our refutations also incur a quasi-polynomial blow-up in depth, and we conjecture that this is inherent. As a step towards this conjecture, we develop a new geometric technique for proving lower bounds on the depth of Cutting Planes proofs. This allows us to establish the first lower bounds on the depth of Semantic Cutting Planes proofs of the Tseitin formulas
- …