Circumference and Pathwidth of Highly Connected Graphs

Birmele [J. Graph Theory, 2003] proved that every graph with circumference t has treewidth at most t-1. Under the additional assumption of 2-connectivity, such graphs have bounded pathwidth, which is a qualitatively stronger result. Birmele's theorem was extended by Birmele, Bondy and Reed [Combinatorica, 2007] who showed that every graph without k disjoint cycles of length at least t has bounded treewidth (as a function of k and t). Our main result states that, under the additional assumption of (k + 1)- connectivity, such graphs have bounded pathwidth. In fact, they have pathwidth O(t^3 + tk^2). Moreover, examples show that (k + 1)-connectivity is required for bounded pathwidth to hold. These results suggest the following general question: for which values of k and graphs H does every k-connected H-minor-free graph have bounded pathwidth? We discuss this question and provide a few observations.Comment: 11 pages, 4 figure

The L(2,1)-labeling of unigraphs

The L(2, 1)-labeling problem consists of assigning colors from the integer set 0 ...., lambda to the nodes of a graph G in such a way that nodes at a distance of at most two get different colors, while adjacent nodes get colors which are at least two apart. The aim of this problem is to minimize lambda and it is in general NP-complete. In this paper the problem of L(2, 1)-labeling unigraphs, i.e. graphs uniquely determined by their own degree sequence up to isomorphism, is addressed and a 3/2-approximate algorithm for L(2, 1)-labeling unigraphs is designed. This algorithm runs in 0(n) time, improving the time of the algorithm based on the greedy technique, requiring 0(m) time, that may be near to Theta (n(2)) for unigraphs. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Decomposition, approximation, and coloring of odd-minor-free graphs

We prove two structural decomposition theorems about graphs excluding a fixed odd minor H, and show how these theorems can be used to obtain approximation algorithms for several algorithmic problems in such graphs. Our decomposition results provide new structural insights into odd-H-minor-free graphs, on the one hand generalizing the central structural result from Graph Minor Theory, and on the other hand providing an algorithmic decomposition into two bounded-treewidth graphs, generalizing a similar result for minors. As one example of how these structural results conquer difficult problems, we obtain a polynomial-time 2-approximation for vertex coloring in odd-H-minor-free graphs, improving on the previous O(jV (H)j)-approximation for such graphs and generalizing the previous 2-approximation for H-minor-free graphs. The class of odd-H-minor-free graphs is a vast generalization of the well-studied H-minor-free graph families and includes, for example, all bipartite graphs plus a bounded number of apices. Odd-H-minor-free graphs are particularly interesting from a structural graph theory perspective because they break away from the sparsity of H- minor-free graphs, permitting a quadratic number of edges

On the Distance Identifying Set Meta-Problem and Applications to the Complexity of Identifying Problems on Graphs

Numerous problems consisting in identifying vertices in graphs using distances are useful in domains such as network verification and graph isomorphism. Unifying them into a meta-problem may be of main interest. We introduce here a promising solution named Distance Identifying Set. The model contains Identifying Code (IC), Locating Dominating Set (LD) and their generalizations $r$-IC and $r$-LD where the closed neighborhood is considered up to distance $r$. It also contains Metric Dimension (MD) and its refinement $r$-MD in which the distance between two vertices is considered as infinite if the real distance exceeds $r$. Note that while IC = 1-IC and LD = 1-LD, we have MD = $\infty$-MD; we say that MD is not local In this article, we prove computational lower bounds for several problems included in Distance Identifying Set by providing generic reductions from (Planar) Hitting Set to the meta-problem. We mainly focus on two families of problem from the meta-problem: the first one, called bipartite gifted local, contains $r$-IC, $r$-LD and $r$-MD for each positive integer $r$ while the second one, called 1-layered, contains LD, MD and $r$-MD for each positive integer $r$. We have: - the 1-layered problems are NP-hard even in bipartite apex graphs, - the bipartite gifted local problems are NP-hard even in bipartite planar graphs, - assuming ETH, all these problems cannot be solved in $2^{o(\sqrt{n})}$ when restricted to bipartite planar or apex graph, respectively, and they cannot be solved in $2^{o(n)}$ on bipartite graphs, - even restricted to bipartite graphs, they do not admit parameterized algorithms in $2^{O(k)}.n^{O(1)}$ except if W[0] = W[2]. Here $k$ is the solution size of a relevant identifying set. In particular, Metric Dimension cannot be solved in $2^{o(n)}$ under ETH, answering a question of Hartung in 2013