8,642 research outputs found
Simple Dynamics for Plurality Consensus
We study a \emph{Plurality-Consensus} process in which each of anonymous
agents of a communication network initially supports an opinion (a color chosen
from a finite set ). Then, in every (synchronous) round, each agent can
revise his color according to the opinions currently held by a random sample of
his neighbors. It is assumed that the initial color configuration exhibits a
sufficiently large \emph{bias} towards a fixed plurality color, that is,
the number of nodes supporting the plurality color exceeds the number of nodes
supporting any other color by additional nodes. The goal is having the
process to converge to the \emph{stable} configuration in which all nodes
support the initial plurality. We consider a basic model in which the network
is a clique and the update rule (called here the \emph{3-majority dynamics}) of
the process is the following: each agent looks at the colors of three random
neighbors and then applies the majority rule (breaking ties uniformly).
We prove that the process converges in time with high probability, provided that .
We then prove that our upper bound above is tight as long as . This fact implies an exponential time-gap between the
plurality-consensus process and the \emph{median} process studied by Doerr et
al. in [ACM SPAA'11].
A natural question is whether looking at more (than three) random neighbors
can significantly speed up the process. We provide a negative answer to this
question: In particular, we show that samples of polylogarithmic size can speed
up the process by a polylogarithmic factor only.Comment: Preprint of journal versio
Active Learning and Best-Response Dynamics
We examine an important setting for engineered systems in which low-power
distributed sensors are each making highly noisy measurements of some unknown
target function. A center wants to accurately learn this function by querying a
small number of sensors, which ordinarily would be impossible due to the high
noise rate. The question we address is whether local communication among
sensors, together with natural best-response dynamics in an
appropriately-defined game, can denoise the system without destroying the true
signal and allow the center to succeed from only a small number of active
queries. By using techniques from game theory and empirical processes, we prove
positive (and negative) results on the denoising power of several natural
dynamics. We then show experimentally that when combined with recent agnostic
active learning algorithms, this process can achieve low error from very few
queries, performing substantially better than active or passive learning
without these denoising dynamics as well as passive learning with denoising
Approximate Consensus in Highly Dynamic Networks: The Role of Averaging Algorithms
In this paper, we investigate the approximate consensus problem in highly
dynamic networks in which topology may change continually and unpredictably. We
prove that in both synchronous and partially synchronous systems, approximate
consensus is solvable if and only if the communication graph in each round has
a rooted spanning tree, i.e., there is a coordinator at each time. The striking
point in this result is that the coordinator is not required to be unique and
can change arbitrarily from round to round. Interestingly, the class of
averaging algorithms, which are memoryless and require no process identifiers,
entirely captures the solvability issue of approximate consensus in that the
problem is solvable if and only if it can be solved using any averaging
algorithm. Concerning the time complexity of averaging algorithms, we show that
approximate consensus can be achieved with precision of in a
coordinated network model in synchronous
rounds, and in rounds when
the maximum round delay for a message to be delivered is . While in
general, an upper bound on the time complexity of averaging algorithms has to
be exponential, we investigate various network models in which this exponential
bound in the number of nodes reduces to a polynomial bound. We apply our
results to networked systems with a fixed topology and classical benign fault
models, and deduce both known and new results for approximate consensus in
these systems. In particular, we show that for solving approximate consensus, a
complete network can tolerate up to 2n-3 arbitrarily located link faults at
every round, in contrast with the impossibility result established by Santoro
and Widmayer (STACS '89) showing that exact consensus is not solvable with n-1
link faults per round originating from the same node
- …