1,292 research outputs found

    The bondage number of graphs on topological surfaces and Teschner's conjecture

    Get PDF
    The bondage number of a graph is the smallest number of its edges whose removal results in a graph having a larger domination number. We provide constant upper bounds for the bondage number of graphs on topological surfaces, improve upper bounds for the bondage number in terms of the maximum vertex degree and the orientable and non-orientable genera of the graph, and show tight lower bounds for the number of vertices of graphs 2-cell embeddable on topological surfaces of a given genus. Also, we provide stronger upper bounds for graphs with no triangles and graphs with the number of vertices larger than a certain threshold in terms of the graph genera. This settles Teschner's Conjecture in positive for almost all graphs.Comment: 21 pages; Original version from January 201

    Upper bounds for the bondage number of graphs on topological surfaces

    Get PDF
    The bondage number b(G) of a graph G is the smallest number of edges of G whose removal from G results in a graph having the domination number larger than that of G. We show that, for a graph G having the maximum vertex degree Δ(G)\Delta(G) and embeddable on an orientable surface of genus h and a non-orientable surface of genus k, b(G)min{Δ(G)+h+2,Δ(G)+k+1}b(G)\le \min\{\Delta(G)+h+2, \Delta(G)+k+1\}. This generalizes known upper bounds for planar and toroidal graphs.Comment: 10 pages; Updated version (April 2011); Presented at the 7th ECCC, Wolfville (Nova Scotia, Canada), May 4-6, 2011, and the 23rd BCC, Exeter (England, UK), July 3-8, 201

    The bondage number of random graphs

    Get PDF
    A dominating set of a graph is a subset DD of its vertices such that every vertex not in DD is adjacent to at least one member of DD. The domination number of a graph GG is the number of vertices in a smallest dominating set of GG. The bondage number of a nonempty graph GG is the size of a smallest set of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with domination number greater than the domination number of GG. In this note, we study the bondage number of binomial random graph G(n,p)G(n,p). We obtain a lower bound that matches the order of the trivial upper bound. As a side product, we give a one-point concentration result for the domination number of G(n,p)G(n,p) under certain restrictions

    Weak and Strong Reinforcement Number For a Graph

    Get PDF
    Introducing the weak reinforcement number which is the minimum number of added edges to reduce the weak dominating number, and giving some boundary of this new parameter and trees

    Bondage number of grid graphs

    Full text link
    The bondage number b(G)b(G) of a nonempty graph GG is the cardinality of a smallest set of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with domination number greater than the domination number of GG. Here we study the bondage number of some grid-like graphs. In this sense, we obtain some bounds or exact values of the bondage number of some strong product and direct product of two paths.Comment: 13 pages. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 201

    A bound on the size of a graph with given order and bondage number

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe domination number of a graph is the minimum number of vertices in a set S such that every vertex of the graph is either in S or adjacent to a member of S. The bondage number of a graph G is the cardinality of a smallest set of edges whose removal results in a graph with domination number greater than that of G. We prove that a graph with p vertices and bondage number b has at least p(b + 1)/4 edges, and for each b there is at least one p for which this bound is sharp. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserve

    An improved upper bound for the bondage number of graphs on surfaces

    Full text link
    The bondage number b(G)b(G) of a graph GG is the smallest number of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with larger domination number. Recently Gagarin and Zverovich showed that, for a graph GG with maximum degree Δ(G)\Delta(G) and embeddable on an orientable surface of genus hh and a non-orientable surface of genus kk, b(G)min{Δ(G)+h+2,Δ+k+1}b(G)\leq\min\{\Delta(G)+h+2,\Delta+k+1\}. They also gave examples showing that adjustments of their proofs implicitly provide better results for larger values of hh and kk. In this paper we establish an improved explicit upper bound for b(G)b(G), using the Euler characteristic χ\chi instead of the genera hh and kk, with the relations χ=22h\chi=2-2h and χ=2k\chi=2-k. We show that b(G)Δ(G)+rb(G)\leq\Delta(G)+\lfloor r\rfloor for the case χ0\chi\leq0 (i.e. h1h\geq1 or k2k\geq2), where rr is the largest real root of the cubic equation z3+2z2+(6χ7)z+18χ24=0z^3+2z^2+(6\chi-7)z+18\chi-24=0. Our proof is based on the technique developed by Carlson-Develin and Gagarin-Zverovich, and includes some elementary calculus as a new ingredient. We also find an asymptotically equivalent result b(G)Δ(G)+126χ1/2b(G)\leq\Delta(G)+\lceil\sqrt{12-6\chi\,}-1/2\rceil for χ0\chi\leq0, and a further improvement for graphs with large girth.Comment: 8 pages, to appear in Discrete Mathematic
    corecore