21 research outputs found
A national clinical decision support infrastructure to enable the widespread and consistent practice of genomic and personalized medicine
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years, the completion of the Human Genome Project and other rapid advances in genomics have led to increasing anticipation of an era of genomic and personalized medicine, in which an individual's health is optimized through the use of all available patient data, including data on the individual's genome and its downstream products. Genomic and personalized medicine could transform healthcare systems and catalyze significant reductions in morbidity, mortality, and overall healthcare costs.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Critical to the achievement of more efficient and effective healthcare enabled by genomics is the establishment of a robust, nationwide clinical decision support infrastructure that assists clinicians in their use of genomic assays to guide disease prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Requisite components of this infrastructure include the standardized representation of genomic and non-genomic patient data across health information systems; centrally managed repositories of computer-processable medical knowledge; and standardized approaches for applying these knowledge resources against patient data to generate and deliver patient-specific care recommendations. Here, we provide recommendations for establishing a national decision support infrastructure for genomic and personalized medicine that fulfills these needs, leverages existing resources, and is aligned with the <it>Roadmap for National Action on Clinical Decision Support </it>commissioned by the U.S. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Critical to the establishment of this infrastructure will be strong leadership and substantial funding from the federal government.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>A national clinical decision support infrastructure will be required for reaping the full benefits of genomic and personalized medicine. Essential components of this infrastructure include standards for data representation; centrally managed knowledge repositories; and standardized approaches for leveraging these knowledge repositories to generate patient-specific care recommendations at the point of care.</p
Recommended from our members
Decision time for clinical decision support systems
Clinical decision support systems are interactive software systems designed to assist clinicians with decision making tasks, such as determining a diagnosis or recommending a treatment for a patient. Clinical decision support systems are a widely researched topic in the Computer Science community but their inner workings are less well understood by and known to clinicians. In this article we provide a brief explanation of clinical decision support systems and provide some examples of real world systems. We also describe some of the challenges to implementing these systems in clinical environments and posit some of the reasons for limited adoption of decision support systems in practice. We aim to engage clinicians in the development of decision support system that can meaningfully help with their decision making tasks and open up a discussion about the future of automated clinical decision support as a part of healthcare delivery
EHRs Connect Research and Practice: Where Predictive Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, and Clinical Decision Support Intersect
Objectives: Electronic health records (EHRs) are only a first step in
capturing and utilizing health-related data - the challenge is turning that
data into useful information. Furthermore, EHRs are increasingly likely to
include data relating to patient outcomes, functionality such as clinical
decision support, and genetic information as well, and, as such, can be seen as
repositories of increasingly valuable information about patients' health
conditions and responses to treatment over time. Methods: We describe a case
study of 423 patients treated by Centerstone within Tennessee and Indiana in
which we utilized electronic health record data to generate predictive
algorithms of individual patient treatment response. Multiple models were
constructed using predictor variables derived from clinical, financial and
geographic data. Results: For the 423 patients, 101 deteriorated, 223 improved
and in 99 there was no change in clinical condition. Based on modeling of
various clinical indicators at baseline, the highest accuracy in predicting
individual patient response ranged from 70-72% within the models tested. In
terms of individual predictors, the Centerstone Assessment of Recovery Level -
Adult (CARLA) baseline score was most significant in predicting outcome over
time (odds ratio 4.1 + 2.27). Other variables with consistently significant
impact on outcome included payer, diagnostic category, location and provision
of case management services. Conclusions: This approach represents a promising
avenue toward reducing the current gap between research and practice across
healthcare, developing data-driven clinical decision support based on
real-world populations, and serving as a component of embedded clinical
artificial intelligences that "learn" over time.Comment: Keywords: Data Mining; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Electronic
Health Records; Implementation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Data Warehouse;
(2012). EHRs Connect Research and Practice: Where Predictive Modeling,
Artificial Intelligence, and Clinical Decision Support Intersect. Health
Policy and Technology. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with
arXiv:1112.166
Digital Drugs: an anatomy of new medicines
Medicines are digitalized as aspects of their regulation and use are embodied in or draw from interlinked computerized systems and databases. This paper considers how this development changes the delivery of health care, the pharma industry, and regulatory and professional structures, as it reconfigures the material character of drugs themselves. It draws on the concept of assemblage in presenting a theory-based analysis that explores digital drugs’ ontological status including how they embody benefit and value. The paper addresses three interconnected domains – that of use of drugs (practice), of research (epistemology) and of regulation (structures)
Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers
AbstractOur conceptual model demonstrates our goal to investigate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) utilization on cancer screening improvement strategies in the community health care (CHC) setting. We employed a dual modeling technique using both statistical and computational modeling to evaluate impact. Our statistical model used the Spearman’s Rho test to evaluate the strength of relationship between our proximal outcome measures (CDS utilization) against our distal outcome measure (provider self-reported cancer screening improvement). Our computational model relied on network evolution theory and made use of a tool called Construct-TM to model the use of CDS measured by the rate of organizational learning. We employed the use of previously collected survey data from community health centers Cancer Health Disparities Collaborative (HDCC). Our intent is to demonstrate the added valued gained by using a computational modeling tool in conjunction with a statistical analysis when evaluating the impact a health information technology, in the form of CDS, on health care quality process outcomes such as facility-level screening improvement. Significant simulated disparities in organizational learning over time were observed between community health centers beginning the simulation with high and low clinical decision support capability
Standards for Scalable Clinical Decision Support: Need, Current and Emerging Standards, Gaps, and Proposal for Progress
Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS
Doctor of Philosophy
dissertationThe widespread use of genomic information to improve clinical care has long been a goal of clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. With the completion of the Human Genome Project over a decade ago, the feasibility of attaining this goal on a widespread basis is becoming a greater reality. In fact, new genome sequencing technologies are bringing the cost of obtaining a patient's genomic information within reach of the general population. While this is an exciting prospect to health care, many barriers still remain to effectively use genomic information in a clinically meaningful way. These barriers, if not overcome, will limit the ability of genomic information to provide a significant impact on health care. Nevertheless, clinical decision support (CDS), which entails the provision of patient-specific knowledge to clinicians at appropriate times to enhance health care, offers a feasible solution. As such, this body of work represents an effort to develop a functional CDS solution capable of leveraging whole genome sequence information on a widespread basis. Many considerations were made in the design of the CDS solution in order to overcome the complexities of genomic information while aligning with common health information technology approaches and standards. This work represents an important advancement in the capabilities of integrating actionable genomic information within the clinical workflow using health informatics approaches