Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A comparative study between Iranian and Malaysian SMEs

This paper explores potential advantages of using virtual teams for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with a comprehensive review on various aspects of virtual teams. Based on the standing of the pertinent literature, attempt has been made to study the aspects by online survey method in Iran and Malaysia. In both countries, SMEs play an important role in their economies, employments, and capacity building. Virtual R&D team can be one of the means to increase SMEs efficiency and competitiveness in their local as well as global markets. In this context, surveys have been conducted to evaluate the effects of virtuality to the growth of SMEs. The study addresses some differences between two countries in engaging virtual research and development (R&D) teams in their SMEs. It is observed that there is a significant difference between the SMEs turnover that employed virtual team and that did not employ the virtual team. The way for further studies and recommend improvements are proposed.Virtual R&D team, small and medium enterprises, survey, developing countries.

Living Innovation Laboratory Model Design and Implementation

Living Innovation Laboratory (LIL) is an open and recyclable way for multidisciplinary researchers to remote control resources and co-develop user centered projects. In the past few years, there were several papers about LIL published and trying to discuss and define the model and architecture of LIL. People all acknowledge about the three characteristics of LIL: user centered, co-creation, and context aware, which make it distinguished from test platform and other innovation approaches. Its existing model consists of five phases: initialization, preparation, formation, development, and evaluation. Goal Net is a goal-oriented methodology to formularize a progress. In this thesis, Goal Net is adopted to subtract a detailed and systemic methodology for LIL. LIL Goal Net Model breaks the five phases of LIL into more detailed steps. Big data, crowd sourcing, crowd funding and crowd testing take place in suitable steps to realize UUI, MCC and PCA throughout the innovation process in LIL 2.0. It would become a guideline for any company or organization to develop a project in the form of an LIL 2.0 project. To prove the feasibility of LIL Goal Net Model, it was applied to two real cases. One project is a Kinect game and the other one is an Internet product. They were both transformed to LIL 2.0 successfully, based on LIL goal net based methodology. The two projects were evaluated by phenomenography, which was a qualitative research method to study human experiences and their relations in hope of finding the better way to improve human experiences. Through phenomenographic study, the positive evaluation results showed that the new generation of LIL had more advantages in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.Comment: This is a book draf

Outside the Voucher: Evaluating the Creative Voucher Scheme

This chapter seeks to elaborate on what one might have expected to be the straightforward task of delivering and evaluating Creativeworks London’s (CWL) Creative Voucher scheme.1 What made the project difficult was that the notion of the “creative” voucher has not been used before; it was not a policy developed from a direct evidence base. Moreover, the Creativeworks London project was premised on the delivery of three funding streams of which the vouchers were one; indeed something approaching half of these funds were targeted to resource creative vouchers. This chapter offers a discussion of how we implemented the creative vouchers, the product of which makes up most of this volume. It also raises the question of what and how one might evaluate vouchers; something, we argue, that does not gain from a reduction to a limited set of quantitative indicators. Indeed, our reflections on the process projected us into a far more exploratory and nuanced narrative account of the vouchers; hence the chapters of this book which represent a range of different facets and experiences of the creative voucher scheme. Traditional evaluations of innovation and knowledge transfer are based upon simplistic mono-causal models whereby the dominant notion is that knowledge will naturally diffuse from high concentrations to low concentrations: like a gas; this of course is a social physics model. The failure to diffuse evenly, it is normally hypothesized, must be due to some “blockage” or “barrier.” In keeping with mechanical analogies, much policy action is focused on “fixing the plumbing” that is the leaky knowledge pipelines. The challenge is that the logic behind knowledge transfer, let alone policies such as vouchers, are seldom explicitly stated, but rather assumed as common sense. As we experience the transformation from mass production economies to those based on what are variously termed service economies, knowledge economies, or even cultural economies the physical movement of goods, innovation and ideas materialized as “solutions” (as “technology” has commonly been) has been replaced by weightless or virtual goods: ideas. Physicalist analogies might have been helpful in an old manufacturing economy; it is clear that they are less helpful in either dematerialized production, or the realm of ideas exclusively. Moreover, the Creativeworks London project was explicitly funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) with a view to demonstrating the role of what the arts and humanities can contribute to the processes of knowledge transfer between universities and the creative economy (see Chapter One). It is obvious that the arts and humanities favor different approaches to knowledge than that of the sciences; in particular the humanities focus on the nature of human experience and ideas—one might argue that it is the ideal type of knowledge transfer. The humanities has a rather more nuanced and relational perspective on knowledge and human experience than the sciences, focused as they often are on physical processes and outcomes. We saw it as our task to explore and reflect on creative vouchers and meanings. Whereas the individual voucher stories provide a rich narrative of what the knowledge exchange process “looks like” and at times what it might “feel like,” and what meanings it produces for those involved, this chapter attempts to examine a linked story across the voucher process. It is not seeking to generalize or summarize, rather it explores the voucher process. In this sense we resist the traditional notion of evaluation, arguing that it is necessary to understand the process before we can possibly evaluate it against objectives, personal, institutional or political

Work-Based Learning in California: Opportunities and Models for Expansion

Work-based learning is an educational strategy that links academic instruction with the world of work. By itself, it is a powerful tool for motivating students and enhancing learning. But it holds particular promise in the context of multiple pathways, an approach to high school reform in California that seeks to prepare more young people for success both in college and the workplace. This report by WestEd takes a broad look at work-based learning in California: how it is practiced, what it looks like when done well and how it could be expanded to engage more students

Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture

[EN] Inter-enterprise architecture (IEA) is a new concept that seeks to apply the tools and methodologies of enterprise architecture (EA) in a collaborative context, in order to model collaborative organizations in an inclusive manner. According to the main enterprise architectures proposed to this point, an EA should be conformed at least for a framework, a methodology and a modelling language. Sensing enterprise (SE) is an attribute of an enterprise or a network that allows it to react to business stimuli originating on the Internet. These fields have come into focus recently, and there is not evidence of the use of IEA for modelling a SE, while finding an interesting gap to work on. Thus, this paper proposes an initial framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture (FISEA), which seeks to classify, organize, store and communicate, at the conceptual level, all the elements for inter-sensing enterprise architectures and their relationships, ensuring their consistency and integrity. This FISEA provides a clear idea about the elements and views that create collaborative network and their inter-relationships, based on the support of Future Internet.This work was supported by the European Commission FP7 UNITE Project, through its Secondment Programme and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia ADENPRO-PJP project (ref. SP20120703).Vargas, A.; Cuenca, L.; Boza, A.; Sacala, I.; Moisescu, M. (2016). Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 27(1):55-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0901-zS5572271Adaba, G., Rusu, L., & Mekawy, M. (2010). Business-IT alignment in trade facilitation: A case study. In organizational, business, and technological aspects of the knowledge society. Communications in Computer and Information. Science, 44(112), 146–154.Afsarmanesh, H., & Msanjila, S. (2008). Inter-organizational trust in VBEs. In L. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & M. Ollus (Eds.), Methods and tools for collaborative networked organizations (pp. 91–118). New York: Springer.Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L., & Ermilova, E. (2008). VBE reference framework. In L. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & M. Ollus (Eds.), Methods and tools for collaborative networked organizations (pp. 35–68). New York: Springer.Arango, M., Londoño, J., & Zapata, J. (2010). Arquitectura empresarial- Una visión general. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, 9(16), 101–111.Audy, J., Lehoux, N., & D’Amours, S. (2012). A framework for an efficient implementation of logistics collaborations. International Transactions in Operational Research, 19(5), 633–657.Boza, A., Cuenca, L., Poler, R., Michaelides, Z., & Systems, Enterprise Information. (2014). The interoperability force in the ERP field. Enterprise Information Systems,. doi: 10.1080/17517575.2013.866697Camarinha-Matos, L., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2005). Collaborative networks: A new scientific discipline. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(4–5), 439–452.Camarinha-Matos, L., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2008). Collaborative networks: Reference modeling. New York: Springer.Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H., & Ollus, M. (2008). ECOLEAD and CNO base concepts. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & M. Ollus (Eds.), Methods and tools for collaborative networked organizations (pp. 35–68). New York: Springer.Chalmeta, R., & Grangel, R. (2003). ARDIN extension for virtual enterprise integration. The Journal of Systems and Software, 67(3), 141–152.Chen, D., Vallespir, B., & Doumeingts, G. (1997). GRAI integrated methodology and its mapping onto generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology. Computers in Industry, 33(2), 387–394.Choi, Y., Kang, D., Chae, H., & Kim, K. (2008). An enterprise architecture framework for collaboration of virtual enterprise chains. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(11–12), 1065–1078.CIMOSA Asociation. (1996). CIMOSA Primer on key concepts, purpose and business value.Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals CSCMP. (2010). CSCMP. Glosary of terms. from http://cscmp.org/resources-research/glossary-terms . Accessed 9 February 2013Coutinho, C., Cretan, A., Ferreira, C., Ghodous, P., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2014). Service-based negotiation for advanced collaboration in enterprise networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,. doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0857-4Cuenca, L. (2009). Marco arquitectónico para la propuesta IE-GIP. Extensión de la arquitectura CIMOSA. Aplicación a una empresa del sector cerámico. Tesis Doctoral Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.Cuenca, L., Boza, A., & Ortiz, A. (2011). An enterprise engineering approach for the alignment of business and information technology strategy. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(11), 974–992.Cuenca, L., Ortiz, A., & Boza, A. (2005). Arquitectura de Empresa. Visión General. Gijón: IX Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización.Dong, X., Liu, Q., & Yin, D. (2008). Business performance, business strategy, and information system strategic alignment: An empirical study on Chinese firms. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 348–354.Ermilova, E., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2007). Modeling and management of profiles and competencies in VBEs. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(5), 561–586.Estimali, H., Gardesh, H., & Sikari, S. (2010). Validating ITIL maturity to strategic business-IT alignment. In 2nd International conference on computer technology and development (ICCTD 2010).European Commission European Society and Media. (2007). Dygital Business Ecosystems. In F. Nachira, P. Dini, A. Nicolai, M. Le Louarn, & L. Rivera (Eds.). http://www.digital-ecosystems.org/book/ . Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Accessed 15 October 2012Executive Branch of the U.S. Federal Government. (2012). A Common Approach to Federal Enterprise Architecture. The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/egov_docs/common_approach_to_federal_ea.pdf . Accessed 13 August 2013Franco, R., Gomez, P., Ortiz, A., & Navarro, R. (2012). Integrated approach for interoperability in collaborative networs and service-based ecosystems. In R. Poler, G. Doumeingts, B. Katzy, & R. Chalmeta (Eds.), Enterpise interoperability V (pp. 329–339). London: Springer.Force, I. F. I. P.-I. F. A. C. Task. (1998). GERAM: Generalised enterprise reference architecture and methodology. International Federation for Information Processing, 1(2), 30.Future Internet Enterprise Systems (FInES) Cluster. (2012). FInES Research Roadmap 2025. From http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/enet/documents/fines-research-roadmap-v30_en.pdf . Accessed 13 October 2013Henderson, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484.Hu, Q., & Huang, D. (2006). Using the balanced scorecard to achieve sustained IT-business alignment: A case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 181–204.ISO 15704. (2000). Industrial automation systems–Requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies.ISO/CEN 19439. (2006). Enterprise integration–Framework for enterprise modelling.Kilger, C., Reuter, B., & Stadtler, H. (2008). Collaborative planning. In H. Stadtler & C. Kilger (Eds.), Supply chain management and advanced planning-concepts, models software and case studies (pp. 263–284). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Kosanke, K., Vernadat, F., & Zelm, M. (1999). CIMOSA: Enterprise engineering and integration. Computers in Industry, 40(2), 83– 97.Lankhorst, M. (2009). Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. New York: Springer.Luftman, J. (2004). Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 99.Maes, R. (1999). Reconsidering information management through a generic framework. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, Department of Accountancy & Information Management.Mehandjiev, N., & Grefen, P. (2010). Dynamic business process formation for instant virtual enterprises. London.Mekawy, M., Rusu, L., & Ahmed, N. (2009). Business and IT alignment: An evaluation of strategic alignment models. In best practices for the knowledge society. Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All, 49, 447–455.Moisescu, M., Sacala, I., Stanescu, A., & Serbanescu, C. (2012). Towards integration of knowledge extraction form process interoperability in future internet enterprise systems. Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, 14(1), 1458–1463.Ortiz, A. (1998). Propuesta para el Desarrollo de Programas de Integración Empresarial en Empresas Industriales. Aplicación a una Empresa del Sector Cerámico: Tesis Doctoral Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Palmer, C., Harding, J., Swarnkar, R., Das, B., & Young, R. (2013). Generating rules from data mining for collaboration moderator services. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 313–330.Pijpers, V., Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2009). Aligning information system design and business strategy–A starting internet company. In the practice of enterprise modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 15, 47–61.Plaza, J., Burgos, J., & Carmona, E. (2010). Measuring stakeholder integration: Knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 419–442.Romero, D., Galeano, N., & Molina, A. (2010). Virtual organisation breeding environments value system and its elements. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(3), 267–286.Sacala, I., Moisescu, M., & Repta, D. (2013). Towards the development of the future internet based enterprise in the context of cyber-physical systems. In 2013 19th International conference on control systems and computer science (CSCS), (pp. 405–412).Santana, R., Daneva, M., van Eck, P., & Wieringa, R. (2008). Towards a business-IT aligned maturity model for collaborative networked organizations. In 12th International conference on advanced information systems engineering.Schekkerman, J. (2004). Enterprise architecture validation. Achieving business-aligned and validated entreprise architectures. Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments (IFEAD). http://enterprise-architecture.info/Images/Extended%20Enterprise/Extended%20Enterprise%20Architecture2.htm . Accessed 10 October 2011Schekkerman, J. (2006). Extended enterprise architecture framework essentials guide. Retrieved 2012 from Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments (IFEAD). http://enterprise-architecture.info/Images/E2AF/Extended%20Enterprise%20Architecture%20Framework%20Essentials%20Guide%20v1.5.pdf . Accessed 23 September 2012Stadtler, H. (2009). A framework for collaborative planning and state-of-the-art. OR Spectrum, 31, 5–30.Stelzer, D. (2010). Enterprise architecture principles: Literature review and research directions. Service-Oriented Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 12–21.Swarnkar, R., Choudhary, A., Harding, J., Das, B., & Young, R. (2012). A framework for collaboration moderator services to support knowledge based collaboration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 2003–2023.The, OPEN GROUP. (2011). TOGAF. http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/ . Accessed 18 November 2011U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2000). Treasury enterprise architecture framework. http://www.treasury.gov/Pages/default.aspx . Accessed 23 November 2011United States Department of Defense. (2010). Department of defense architecture framework. http://dodcio.defense.gov/dodaf20/dodaf20_capability.aspx . Accessed 28 November 2011Vargas, A., Boza, A., & Cuenca, L. (2011). Towards interoperability through Inter-enterprise collaboration architectures. In R. Meersman, T. Dillon, & P. Herrero (Eds.), On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2011 workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7046, pp. 102–111.Vargas, A., Boza, A., Cuenca, L., & Sacala, I. (2013a). Inter-enterprise architecture and internet of the future. Technological Innovation for the Internet of Things, 394, 25–32.Vargas, A., Boza, A., Cuenca, A., & Ortiz, A. (2013b). Towards a framework for inter-enterprise architecture to boost collaborative networks. In On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2013 workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8186, 179–188.Vargas, A., Boza, A., Cuenca, L., & Ortiz, A. (2014). The importance of strategic alignment in enterprise collaboration. In J. C. Prado-Prado & J. García-Arca (Eds.), Annals of industrial engineering 2012 (pp. 71–78). London: Springer.Vernadat, F. (2003). Enterprise modelling and integration: From fact modelling to enterprise interoperability. Enterprise inter- and intra-organizational integration: Building international consensus. Series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 108.Vesterager, J., Tølle, M., & Bernus, P. (2002). VERA: Virtual enterprise reference. GLOBEMEN final plenary: In GMNBook.Wang, X., Zhou, X., & Jiang, L. (2008). A method of business and IT alignment based on enterprise architecture. In IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics, pp. 740–745.Zachman, J. (1997). Enterprise architecture: The issue of the century. Database Programming and Design, 1–13

Semantic discovery and reuse of business process patterns

Patterns currently play an important role in modern information systems (IS) development and their use has mainly been restricted to the design and implementation phases of the development lifecycle. Given the increasing significance of business modelling in IS development, patterns have the potential of providing a viable solution for promoting reusability of recurrent generalized models in the very early stages of development. As a statement of research-in-progress this paper focuses on business process patterns and proposes an initial methodological framework for the discovery and reuse of business process patterns within the IS development lifecycle. The framework borrows ideas from the domain engineering literature and proposes the use of semantics to drive both the discovery of patterns as well as their reuse

Improving SMES competitiveness reinforcing interorganisational networks in industrial clusters

Drawing on a social network approach this paper proposes a methodology that helps with the empowerment and development of interorganisational networks in clusters. Paper emphasizes the necessity of establishing relationships with other firms and external agents in order to empower the creation and diffusion of knowledge, through factors such as innovation. The aim of the proposed methodology is to know how required knowledge should be located and diffused to identify the opportunities motivating the creation of particular interorganisational networks. Similarly, it is also important to know how to determine which agents might to take advantage of these opportunities creating networks

Virtual R & D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are the driving engine behind economic growth. While SMEs play a critical role in generating employment and supporting trade, they face numerous challenges, the prominent among them are the need to respond to fasting time-to-market, low-cost and rapid solutions to complex organizational problems. Towards that end, research and development (R & D) aspect deserves particular attention to promote and facilitate the operations of SMEs. Virtual R & D team could be a viable option. However, literature shows that virtual R & D teaming in SMEs is still at its infancy. This article provides a comprehensive literature review on different aspects of virtual R & D teams collected from the reputed publications. The purpose of the state-of-the-art literature review is to provide an overview on the structure and dynamics of R & D collaboration in SMEs. Specifying the foundation and importance of virtual teams, the relationship between virtual R & D team and SMEs has been examined. It concludes with the identification of the gaps in the existing literature's and calls for future research. It is argued that setting-up an infrastructure for virtual R & D team in SMEs still requires a large amount of engineering efforts and deserves consideration at top level management.Virtual teams, small and medium enterprises, literature review