119,859 research outputs found

    A flexible service selection for executing virtual services

    Full text link
    [EN] With the adoption of a service-oriented paradigm on the Web, many software services are likely to fulfil similar functional needs for end-users. We propose to aggregate functionally equivalent software services within one single virtual service, that is, to associate a functionality, a graphical user interface (GUI), and a set of selection rules. When an end user invokes such a virtual service through its GUI to answer his/her functional need, the software service that best responds to the end-user s selection policy is selected and executed and the result is then rendered to the end-user through the GUI of the virtual service. A key innovation in this paper is the flexibility of our proposed service selection policy. First, each selection policy can refer to heterogeneous parameters (e.g., service price, end-user location, and QoS). Second, additional parameters can be added to an existing or new policy with little investment. Third, the end users themselves define a selection policy to apply during the selection process, thanks to the GUI element added as part of the virtual service design. This approach was validated though the design, implementation, and testing of an end-to-end architecture, including the implementation of several virtual services and utilizing several software services available today on the Web.This work was partially supported in part by SERVERY (Service Platform for Innovative Communication Environment), a CELTIC project that aims to create a Service Marketplace that bridges the Internet and Telco worlds by merging the flexibility and openness of the former with the trustworthiness and reliability of the latter, enabling effective and profitable cooperation among actors.Laga, N.; Bertin, E.; Crespi, N.; Bedini, I.; Molina Moreno, B.; Zhao, Z. (2013). A flexible service selection for executing virtual services. World Wide Web. 16(3):219-245. doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0184-2S219245163Aggarwal, R., Verma, K., Miller, J., and Milnor, W.: Constraint Driven Web Service Composition in METEOR-S. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international Conference on Services Computing (September 2004). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 23–30.Apple Inc. Apple app store.: Available at: www.apple.com/iphone/appstore/ , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Atzeni, P., Catarci, T., Pernici, B.: Multi-Channel adaptive information Systems. World Wide Web 10(4), 345–347 (2007)Baresi, L., Bianchini, D., Antonellis, V.D., Fugini, M.G., Pernici, B., Plebani, P.: Context-aware Composition of e-Service. In Technologies for E-Services: Third International Workshop, vol. 2819, 28–41, TES 2003, Berlin, German, 2003.Ben Hassine, A., Matsubara, S., Ishida, T.: In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on The Semantic Web (ISWC’06), Isabel Cruz, Stefan Decker, Dean Allemang, Chris Preist, and Daniel Schwabe (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 130–143 (2006).Blum, N., Dutkowski, S., Magedanz, T.: InSeRt - An Intent-based Service Request API for Service Exposure in Next Generation Networks. In Proceedings of 32nd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop. Porto Sani Resort, Kassandra, Greece, 2008 pp21–30.Boussard, M., Fodor, S., Crespi, N., Iribarren, V., Le Rouzic, J.P., Bedini, I., Marton, G., Moro Fernandez, D., Lorenzo Duenas, O., Molina, B.: SERVERY: the Web-Telco marketplace. ICT-Mobile Summit 2009, Santander (2009)Cabrera, Ó., Oriol, M., Franch, X., Marco, J., López, L., Fragoso, O., Santaolaya, R.: WeSSQoS: A Configurable SOA System for Quality-aware Web Service Selection. CoRR 2011, abs/1110.5574.Casati, F., Ilnicki, S., Jin, L., Krishnamoorthy, V., Shan, M.: Adaptive and Dynamic Service Composition in eFlow. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 1789/2000, 13–31, 2000.Cibrán, M. A., Verheecke, B., Vanderperren, W., Suvée, D., and Jonckers, V.: “Aspect-oriented Programming for Dynamic Web Service Selection, Integration and Management.” In Proc. World Wide Web 2007, pp. 211–242.Crespi, N., Boussard, M. Fodor, S.: Converging Web 2.0 with telecommunications. eStrategies Projects, Vol. 10, 108–109. British Publishers, ISSN 1758–2369, June 2009.Dey, A.K., Salber, D., Abowd, G.D.: A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16, 1–67 (2001)Ding, Q., Li, X., and Zhou, X.: Reputation Based Service Selection in Grid Environment. In Proceedings of the 2008 international Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering - Volume 03 (December. 2008). CSSE. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 58–61.Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Thesis dissertation, 2000.Franch, X., Grünbacher, P., Oriol, M., Burgstaller, B., Dhungana, D., López, L., Marco, J., Pimentel, J.: Goal-driven Adaptation of Service-Based Systems from Runtime Monitoring Data. REFS 2011.Frolund, S., Koisten, J.: QML: A Language for Quality of Service Specification. HP Labs technical reports. Available at http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/98/HPL-98-10.html , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Google. Android market.: Available at: www.android.com/market/ , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Google. Intents and Intent Filters.: Available at http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/intents/intents-filters.html , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Gu, X., Nahrstedt, K., Yuan, W., Wichadakul, D., Xu, D.: An Xml-Based Quality of Service Enabling Language for the Web. Technical Report. UMI Order Number: UIUCDCS-R-2001-2212., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Laga, N., Bertin, E., and Crespi, N.: Building a User Friendly Service Dashboard: Automatic and Non-intrusive Chaining between Widgets. In Proceedings of the 2009 Congress on Services - I (July 06–10, 2009). SERVICES. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 484–491.Laga, N., Bertin, E., and Crespi, N.: Business Process Personalization Through Web Widgets. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international Conference on Web Services (July 05–10, 2010). ICWS. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 551–558.Liu, Y., Ngu, A. H., and Zeng, L. Z.: QoS computation and policing in dynamic web service selection. In Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers &Amp; Posters (New York, NY, USA, May 19–21, 2004). WWW Alt. ’04. ACM, New York, NY, 66–73.Malik, Z., Bouguettaya, A.: Rater credibility assessment in Web services interactions. World Wide Web 12(1), 3–25 (2009)Martin, D. et al.: OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C member submission, available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-OWL-S-20041122/ , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Nestler, T., Namoun, A., Schill, A.: End-user development of service-based interactive web applications at the presentation layer. EICS 2011: 197–206.Newcomer, E.: Understanding Web Services: XML, Wsdl, Soap, and UDDI. Addison, Wesley, Boston, Mass., May 2002.O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0, Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.Piessens, F., Jacobs, B., Truyen, E., Joosen, W.: Support for Metadata-driven Selection of Run-time Services in .NET is Promising but Immature. vol. 3, no. 2, Special issue: .NET: The Programmer’s Perspective: ECOOP Workshop, 27–35. 2003.Rasch, K;, Li, F., Sehic, S., Ayani R., and Dustdar, S.: “Context-driven personalized service discovery in pervasive environments,” in Proc World Wide Web, 2011, pp. 295–319.Reichl, P.: From ‘Quality-of-Service’ and ‘Quality-of-Design’ to ‘Quality-of-Experience’: A holistic view on future interactive telecommunication ser-vices. In 15th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, 2007. Soft-COM 2007. Sept. 2007. vol., no.,1–6, 27–29.Rolland, C., Kaabi, R.S., Kraiem, N.: On ISOA: Intentional Services Oriented Architecture. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, volume 4495/2007, 158–172, June 2007.Sanchez, A., Carro, B., Wesner, S.: Telco services for end customers: European Perspective. In Communications Magazine. IEEE 46(2), 14–18 (2008)Santhanam, G. R., Basu, S., and Honavar, V.: On Utilizing Qualitative Preferences in Web Service Composition: A CP-net Based Approach. In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Services, Services - Part I, vol., no.,538–544, 2008.Spanoudakis, G., Mahbub, K., Zisman, A.: A Platform for Context Aware Runtime Web Service Discovery. In Proc IEEE ICWS, 2007, pp233-240.Tsesmetzis, D., Roussaki, I., Sykas, E.: Modeling and Simulation of QoS-aware Web Service Selection for Provider Profit Maximization. Simulation 83(1), 93–106 (2007)Wang, P., Chao, K., Lo, C., Farmer, R., and Kuo, P.: A Reputation-Based Service Selection Scheme. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international Conference on E-Business Engineering (October 21–23, 2009). ICEBE. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 501–506.Wang, H., Yang, D., Zhao, Y., and Gao, Y.: Multiagent System for Reputation--based Web Services Selection. In Proceedings of the Sixth international Conference on Quality Software (October 27–28, 2006). QSIC. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 429–434.Wholesale Applications Community.: WAC Informational Whitepaper. Available at http://www.wholesaleappcommunity.com/About-Wac/BACKGROUND%20TO%20WAC/whitepaper.pdf , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Windows Marketplace.: Available at http://marketplace.windowsphone.com/default.aspx , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Xu, Z., Martin, P., Powley, W., Zulkernine, F.: Reputation-Enhanced QoS-based Web Services Discovery. Web Services, 2007. In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2007. 249, 256, 9–13 July 2007.Yu, Q., Bouguettaya,A.: “Multi-attribute optimization in service selection”. In Proc World Wide Web,2012, pp. 1–31.Yu, T., Zhang, Y., Lin, K. Efficient algorithms for Web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints. ACM Transaction Web 1, 1. Article 6, 26 pages. (May 2007),

    Defining and Prototyping a Life-cycle for Dynamic Service Composition

    Get PDF
    Since the Internet has become a commodity in both wired and wireless environments, new applications and paradigms have emerged to explore this highly distributed and widespread system. One such paradigm is service-orientation, which enables the provision of software functionality as services, \ud allowing in this way the construction of distributed systems with loosely coupled parts. The Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) provides a set of principles to create service-oriented systems, by defining how services can be \ud created, composed, published, discovered and invoked. In accordance with these principles, in this paper we address the challenge of performing dynamic service composition. The composition process and its associated tasks have to be precisely defined so that the different problems of dynamic service composition can be identified and tackled. To achieve this, this paper defines a life-cycle for dynamic service composition, which defines the required phases and stakeholders. Furthermore, we present our prototype in which the different phases of the dynamic service composition life-cycle are being implemented. This prototype is being used to experiment with and validate our initial ideas on dynamic service composition

    Towards runtime discovery, selection and composition of semantic services

    Get PDF
    Service-orientation is gaining momentum in distributed software applications, mainly because it facilitates interoperability and allows application designers to abstract from underlying implementation technologies. Service composition has been acknowledged as a promising approach to create composite services that are capable of supporting service user needs, possibly by personalising the service delivery through the use of context information or user preferences. In this paper we discuss the challenges of automatic service composition, and present DynamiCoS, which is a novel framework that aims at supporting service composition on demand and at runtime for the benefit of service end-users. We define the DynamiCoS framework based on a service composition life-cycle. Framework mechanisms are introduced to tackle each of the phases and requirements of this life-cycle. Semantic services are used in our framework to enable reasoning on the service requests issued by end users, making it possible to automate service discovery, selection and composition. We validate our framework with a prototype that we have built in order to experiment with the mechanisms we have designed. The prototype was evaluated in a testing environment using some use case scenarios. The results of our evaluation give evidences of the feasibility of our approach to support runtime service composition. We also show the benefits of semantic-based frameworks for service composition, particularly for end-users who will be able to have more control on the service composition process

    A survey of QoS-aware web service composition techniques

    Get PDF
    Web service composition can be briefly described as the process of aggregating services with disparate functionalities into a new composite service in order to meet increasingly complex needs of users. Service composition process has been accurate on dealing with services having disparate functionalities, however, over the years the number of web services in particular that exhibit similar functionalities and varying Quality of Service (QoS) has significantly increased. As such, the problem becomes how to select appropriate web services such that the QoS of the resulting composite service is maximized or, in some cases, minimized. This constitutes an NP-hard problem as it is complicated and difficult to solve. In this paper, a discussion of concepts of web service composition and a holistic review of current service composition techniques proposed in literature is presented. Our review spans several publications in the field that can serve as a road map for future research

    From Method Fragments to Method Services

    Full text link
    In Method Engineering (ME) science, the key issue is the consideration of information system development methods as fragments. Numerous ME approaches have produced several definitions of method parts. Different in nature, these fragments have nevertheless some common disadvantages: lack of implementation tools, insufficient standardization effort, and so on. On the whole, the observed drawbacks are related to the shortage of usage orientation. We have proceeded to an in-depth analysis of existing method fragments within a comparison framework in order to identify their drawbacks. We suggest overcoming them by an improvement of the ?method service? concept. In this paper, the method service is defined through the service paradigm applied to a specific method fragment ? chunk. A discussion on the possibility to develop a unique representation of method fragment completes our contribution
    corecore