5,600 research outputs found
Bibliographic Review on Distributed Kalman Filtering
In recent years, a compelling need has arisen to understand the effects of distributed information structures on estimation and filtering. In this paper, a bibliographical review on distributed Kalman filtering (DKF) is provided.\ud
The paper contains a classification of different approaches and methods involved to DKF. The applications of DKF are also discussed and explained separately. A comparison of different approaches is briefly carried out. Focuses on the contemporary research are also addressed with emphasis on the practical applications of the techniques. An exhaustive list of publications, linked directly or indirectly to DKF in the open literature, is compiled to provide an overall picture of different developing aspects of this area
Localisation of mobile nodes in wireless networks with correlated in time measurement noise.
Wireless sensor networks are an inherent part of decision making, object tracking and location awareness systems. This work is focused on simultaneous localisation of mobile nodes based on received signal strength indicators (RSSIs) with correlated in time measurement noises. Two approaches to deal with the correlated measurement noises are proposed in the framework of auxiliary particle filtering: with a noise augmented state vector and the second approach implements noise decorrelation. The performance of the two proposed multi model auxiliary particle filters (MM AUX-PFs) is validated over simulated and real RSSIs and high localisation accuracy is demonstrated
Likelihood Consensus and Its Application to Distributed Particle Filtering
We consider distributed state estimation in a wireless sensor network without
a fusion center. Each sensor performs a global estimation task---based on the
past and current measurements of all sensors---using only local processing and
local communications with its neighbors. In this estimation task, the joint
(all-sensors) likelihood function (JLF) plays a central role as it epitomizes
the measurements of all sensors. We propose a distributed method for computing,
at each sensor, an approximation of the JLF by means of consensus algorithms.
This "likelihood consensus" method is applicable if the local likelihood
functions of the various sensors (viewed as conditional probability density
functions of the local measurements) belong to the exponential family of
distributions. We then use the likelihood consensus method to implement a
distributed particle filter and a distributed Gaussian particle filter. Each
sensor runs a local particle filter, or a local Gaussian particle filter, that
computes a global state estimate. The weight update in each local (Gaussian)
particle filter employs the JLF, which is obtained through the likelihood
consensus scheme. For the distributed Gaussian particle filter, the number of
particles can be significantly reduced by means of an additional consensus
scheme. Simulation results are presented to assess the performance of the
proposed distributed particle filters for a multiple target tracking problem
Belief Consensus Algorithms for Fast Distributed Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks
In distributed target tracking for wireless sensor networks, agreement on the
target state can be achieved by the construction and maintenance of a
communication path, in order to exchange information regarding local likelihood
functions. Such an approach lacks robustness to failures and is not easily
applicable to ad-hoc networks. To address this, several methods have been
proposed that allow agreement on the global likelihood through fully
distributed belief consensus (BC) algorithms, operating on local likelihoods in
distributed particle filtering (DPF). However, a unified comparison of the
convergence speed and communication cost has not been performed. In this paper,
we provide such a comparison and propose a novel BC algorithm based on belief
propagation (BP). According to our study, DPF based on metropolis belief
consensus (MBC) is the fastest in loopy graphs, while DPF based on BP consensus
is the fastest in tree graphs. Moreover, we found that BC-based DPF methods
have lower communication overhead than data flooding when the network is
sufficiently sparse
- …