467 research outputs found

    A constructive characterization of total domination vertex critical graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractLet G be a graph of order n and maximum degree Δ(G) and let γt(G) denote the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of a graph G. A graph G with no isolated vertex is the total domination vertex critical if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, the total domination number of G−v is less than the total domination number of G. We call these graphs γt-critical. For any γt-critical graph G, it can be shown that n≤Δ(G)(γt(G)−1)+1. In this paper, we prove that: Let G be a connected γt-critical graph of order n (n≥3), then n=Δ(G)(γt(G)−1)+1 if and only if G is regular and, for each v∈V(G), there is an A⊆V(G)−{v} such that N(v)∩A=0̸, the subgraph induced by A is 1-regular, and every vertex in V(G)−A−{v} has exactly one neighbor in A

    A characterization of (2γ,γp)-trees

    Get PDF
    AbstractLet G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S⊆V is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent with some vertex in S. The domination number of G, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A set S⊆V is a paired-dominating set of G if S dominates V and 〈S〉 contains at least one perfect matching. The paired-domination number of G, denoted by γp(G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set of G. In this paper, we provide a constructive characterization of those trees for which the paired-domination number is twice the domination number

    Total Domination Dot Critical and Dot Stable Graphs.

    Get PDF
    Two vertices are said to be identifed if they are combined to form one vertex whose neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods. A graph is total domination dot-critical if identifying any pair of adjacent vertices decreases the total domination number. On the other hand, a graph is total domination dot-stable if identifying any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. Identifying any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most two. Among other results, we characterize total domination dot-critical trees with total domination number three and all total domination dot-stable graphs

    Characterizations in Domination Theory

    Get PDF
    Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A set R is a restrained dominating set (total restrained dominating set, resp.) if every vertex in V − R (V) is adjacent to a vertex in R and (every vertex in V −R) to a vertex in V −R. The restrained domination number of G (total restrained domination number of G), denoted by gamma_r(G) (gamma_tr(G)), is the smallest cardinality of a restrained dominating set (total restrained dominating set) of G. If T is a tree of order n, then gamma_r(T) is greater than or equal to (n+2)/3. We show that gamma_tr(T) is greater than or equal to (n+2)/2. Moreover, we show that if n is congruent to 0 mod 4, then gamma_tr(T) is greater than or equal to (n+2)/2 + 1. We then constructively characterize the extremal trees achieving these lower bounds. Finally, if G is a graph of order n greater than or equal to 2, such that both G and G\u27 are not isomorphic to P_3, then gamma_r(G) + gamma_r(G\u27) is greater than or equal to 4 and less than or equal to n +2. We provide a similar result for total restrained domination and characterize the extremal graphs G of order n achieving these bounds
    • …
    corecore