Unveiling Hidden Values of Optimization Models with Metaheuristic Approach

Considering that the decision making process for constrained optimization problem is based on modeling, there is always room for alternative solutions because there is usually a gap between the model and the real problem it depicts. This study looks into the problem of finding such alternative solutions, the non-optimal solutions of interest for constrained optimization models, the SoI problem. SoI problems subsume finding feasible solutions of interest (FoIs) and infeasible solutions of interest (IoIs). In all cases, the interest addressed is post-solution analysis in one form or another. Post-solution analysis of a constrained optimization model occurs after the model has been solved and a good or optimal solution for it has been found. At this point, sensitivity analysis and other questions of import for decision making come into play and for this purpose the SoIs can be very valuable. An evolutionary computation approach (in particular, a population-based metaheuristic) is proposed for solving the SoI problem and a systematic approach with a feasible-infeasible- two-population genetic algorithm is demonstrated. In this study, the effectiveness of the proposed approach on finding SoIs is demonstrated with generalized assignment problems and generalized quadratic assignment problems. Also, the applications of the proposed approach on the multi-objective optimization and robust-optimization issues are examined and illustrated with two-sided matching problems and flowshop scheduling problems respectively

Cardiomyopathy Causing Mutations Stabilize an Intermediate State of Thin Filaments

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recordWhen solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems, an important issue is how to balance convergence, diversity and feasibility simultaneously. To address this issue, this paper proposes a parameter-free constraint handling technique, a two-archive evolutionary algorithm, for constrained multi-objective optimization. It maintains two collaborative archives simultaneously: one, denoted as the convergence-oriented archive (CA), is the driving force to push the population toward the Pareto front; the other one, denoted as the diversity-oriented archive (DA), mainly tends to maintain the population diversity. In particular, to complement the behavior of the CA and provide as much diversified information as possible, the DA aims at exploring areas under-exploited by the CA including the infeasible regions. To leverage the complementary effects of both archives, we develop a restricted mating selection mechanism that adaptively chooses appropriate mating parents from them according to their evolution status. Comprehensive experiments on a series of benchmark problems and a real-world case study fully demonstrate the competitiveness of our proposed algorithm, in comparison to five state-of-the-art constrained evolutionary multi-objective optimizers.Royal Society (Government)Ministry of Science and Technology of ChinaScience and Technology Innovation Committee Foundation of ShenzhenShenzhen Peacock PlanEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC

A two-phase tabu-evolutionary algorithm for the 0–1 multidimensional knapsack problem

The 0–1 multidimensional knapsack problem is a well-known NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with numerous applications. In this work, we present an effective two-phase tabu-evolutionary algorithm for solving this computationally challenging problem. The proposed algorithm integrates two solution-based tabu search methods into the evolutionary framework that applies a hyperplane-constrained crossover operator to generate offspring solutions, a dynamic method to determine search zones of interest, and a diversity-based population updating rule to maintain a healthy population. We show the competitiveness of the proposed algorithm by presenting computational results on the 281 benchmark instances commonly used in the literature. In particular, in a computational comparison with the best algorithms in the literature on multiple data sets, we show that our method on average matches more than twice the number of best known solutions to the harder problems than any other method and in addition yields improved best solutions (new lower bounds) for 4 difficult instances. We investigate two key ingredients of the algorithm to understand their impact on the performance of the algorithm

Composite Differential Evolution for Constrained Evolutionary Optimization

When solving constrained optimization problems (COPs) by evolutionary algorithms, the search algorithm plays a crucial role. In general, we expect that the search algorithm has the capability to balance not only diversity and convergence but also constraints and objective function during the evolution. For this purpose, this paper proposes a composite differential evolution (DE) for constrained optimization, which includes three different trial vector generation strategies with distinct advantages. In order to strike a balance between diversity and convergence, one of these three trial vector generation strategies is able to increase diversity, and the other two exhibit the property of convergence. In addition, to accomplish the tradeoff between constraints and objective function, one of the two trial vector generation strategies for convergence is guided by the individual with the least degree of constraint violation in the population, and the other is guided by the individual with the best objective function value in the population. After producing offspring by the proposed composite DE, the feasibility rule and the ϵ constrained method are combined elaborately for selection in this paper. Moreover, a restart scheme is proposed to help the population jump out of a local optimum in the infeasible region for some extremely complicated COPs. By assembling the above techniques together, a constrained composite DE is proposed. The experiments on two sets of benchmark test functions with various features, i.e., 24 test functions from IEEE CEC2006 and 18 test functions with 10 dimensions and 30 dimensions from IEEE CEC2010, have demonstrated that the proposed method shows better or at least competitive performance against other state-of-the-art methods

A Feature-Based Analysis on the Impact of Set of Constraints for e-Constrained Differential Evolution

Different types of evolutionary algorithms have been developed for constrained continuous optimization. We carry out a feature-based analysis of evolved constrained continuous optimization instances to understand the characteristics of constraints that make problems hard for evolutionary algorithm. In our study, we examine how various sets of constraints can influence the behaviour of e-Constrained Differential Evolution. Investigating the evolved instances, we obtain knowledge of what type of constraints and their features make a problem difficult for the examined algorithm.Comment: 17 Page

Solving the G-problems in less than 500 iterations: Improved efficient constrained optimization by surrogate modeling and adaptive parameter control

Constrained optimization of high-dimensional numerical problems plays an important role in many scientific and industrial applications. Function evaluations in many industrial applications are severely limited and no analytical information about objective function and constraint functions is available. For such expensive black-box optimization tasks, the constraint optimization algorithm COBRA was proposed, making use of RBF surrogate modeling for both the objective and the constraint functions. COBRA has shown remarkable success in solving reliably complex benchmark problems in less than 500 function evaluations. Unfortunately, COBRA requires careful adjustment of parameters in order to do so. In this work we present a new self-adjusting algorithm SACOBRA, which is based on COBRA and capable to achieve high-quality results with very few function evaluations and no parameter tuning. It is shown with the help of performance profiles on a set of benchmark problems (G-problems, MOPTA08) that SACOBRA consistently outperforms any COBRA algorithm with fixed parameter setting. We analyze the importance of the several new elements in SACOBRA and find that each element of SACOBRA plays a role to boost up the overall optimization performance. We discuss the reasons behind and get in this way a better understanding of high-quality RBF surrogate modeling