1,215 research outputs found
Double-Negation Elimination in Some Propositional Logics
This article answers two questions (posed in the literature), each concerning
the guaranteed existence of proofs free of double negation. A proof is free of
double negation if none of its deduced steps contains a term of the form
n(n(t)) for some term t, where n denotes negation. The first question asks for
conditions on the hypotheses that, if satisfied, guarantee the existence of a
double-negation-free proof when the conclusion is free of double negation. The
second question asks about the existence of an axiom system for classical
propositional calculus whose use, for theorems with a conclusion free of double
negation, guarantees the existence of a double-negation-free proof. After
giving conditions that answer the first question, we answer the second question
by focusing on the Lukasiewicz three-axiom system. We then extend our studies
to infinite-valued sentential calculus and to intuitionistic logic and
generalize the notion of being double-negation free. The double-negation proofs
of interest rely exclusively on the inference rule condensed detachment, a rule
that combines modus ponens with an appropriately general rule of substitution.
The automated reasoning program OTTER played an indispensable role in this
study.Comment: 32 pages, no figure
Merging fragments of classical logic
We investigate the possibility of extending the non-functionally complete
logic of a collection of Boolean connectives by the addition of further Boolean
connectives that make the resulting set of connectives functionally complete.
More precisely, we will be interested in checking whether an axiomatization for
Classical Propositional Logic may be produced by merging Hilbert-style calculi
for two disjoint incomplete fragments of it. We will prove that the answer to
that problem is a negative one, unless one of the components includes only
top-like connectives.Comment: submitted to FroCoS 201
Rejection in Łukasiewicz's and Słupecki's Sense
The idea of rejection originated by Aristotle. The notion of rejection
was introduced into formal logic by Łukasiewicz [20]. He applied it to
complete syntactic characterization of deductive systems using an axiomatic
method of rejection of propositions [22, 23]. The paper gives not only genesis,
but also development and generalization of the notion of rejection. It also
emphasizes the methodological approach to biaspectual axiomatic method of
characterization of deductive systems as acceptance (asserted) systems and
rejection (refutation) systems, introduced by Łukasiewicz and developed by
his student Słupecki, the pioneers of the method, which becomes relevant in
modern approaches to logic
A Spectrum of Applications of Automated Reasoning
The likelihood of an automated reasoning program being of substantial
assistance for a wide spectrum of applications rests with the nature of the
options and parameters it offers on which to base needed strategies and
methodologies. This article focuses on such a spectrum, featuring W. McCune's
program OTTER, discussing widely varied successes in answering open questions,
and touching on some of the strategies and methodologies that played a key
role. The applications include finding a first proof, discovering single
axioms, locating improved axiom systems, and simplifying existing proofs. The
last application is directly pertinent to the recently found (by R. Thiele)
Hilbert's twenty-fourth problem--which is extremely amenable to attack with the
appropriate automated reasoning program--a problem concerned with proof
simplification. The methodologies include those for seeking shorter proofs and
for finding proofs that avoid unwanted lemmas or classes of term, a specific
option for seeking proofs with smaller equational or formula complexity, and a
different option to address the variable richness of a proof. The type of proof
one obtains with the use of OTTER is Hilbert-style axiomatic, including details
that permit one sometimes to gain new insights. We include questions still open
and challenges that merit consideration.Comment: 13 page
Some Concerns Regarding Ternary-relation Semantics and Truth-theoretic Semantics in General
This paper deals with a collection of concerns that, over a period of time, led the author away from the Routley–Meyer semantics, and towards proof- theoretic approaches to relevant logics, and indeed to the weak relevant logic MC of meaning containment
Categorical Abstract Algebraic Logic: Referential π-Institutions
Wójcicki introduced in the late 1970s the concept of a referential semantics for propositional logics. Referential semantics incorporate features of the Kripke possible world semantics for modal logics into the realm of algebraic and matrix semantics of arbitrary sentential logics. A well-known theorem of Wójcicki asserts that a logic has a referential semantics if and only if it is selfextensional. Referential semantics was subsequently studied in detail by Malinowski and the concept of selfextensionality has played, more recently, an important role in the field of abstract algebraic logic in connection with the operator approach to algebraizability. We introduce and review some of the basic definitions and results pertaining to the referential semantics of π-institutions, abstracting corresponding results from the realm of propositional logics
Suszko's Problem: Mixed Consequence and Compositionality
Suszko's problem is the problem of finding the minimal number of truth values
needed to semantically characterize a syntactic consequence relation. Suszko
proved that every Tarskian consequence relation can be characterized using only
two truth values. Malinowski showed that this number can equal three if some of
Tarski's structural constraints are relaxed. By so doing, Malinowski introduced
a case of so-called mixed consequence, allowing the notion of a designated
value to vary between the premises and the conclusions of an argument. In this
paper we give a more systematic perspective on Suszko's problem and on mixed
consequence. First, we prove general representation theorems relating
structural properties of a consequence relation to their semantic
interpretation, uncovering the semantic counterpart of substitution-invariance,
and establishing that (intersective) mixed consequence is fundamentally the
semantic counterpart of the structural property of monotonicity. We use those
to derive maximum-rank results proved recently in a different setting by French
and Ripley, as well as by Blasio, Marcos and Wansing, for logics with various
structural properties (reflexivity, transitivity, none, or both). We strengthen
these results into exact rank results for non-permeable logics (roughly, those
which distinguish the role of premises and conclusions). We discuss the
underlying notion of rank, and the associated reduction proposed independently
by Scott and Suszko. As emphasized by Suszko, that reduction fails to preserve
compositionality in general, meaning that the resulting semantics is no longer
truth-functional. We propose a modification of that notion of reduction,
allowing us to prove that over compact logics with what we call regular
connectives, rank results are maintained even if we request the preservation of
truth-functionality and additional semantic properties.Comment: Keywords: Suszko's thesis; truth value; logical consequence; mixed
consequence; compositionality; truth-functionality; many-valued logic;
algebraic logic; substructural logics; regular connective
- …