4 research outputs found

    3์ค‘ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋ธํƒ€-์‹œ๊ทธ๋งˆ ADC๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ Capacitive MEMS ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœํฐ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022. 8. ๊น€์ˆ˜ํ™˜.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํŠธ๋ฆฌํ”Œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ Capacitive ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ MEMS ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœํฐ์ด ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠธ๋ฆฌํ”Œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์€ ๋ธํƒ€-์‹œ๊ทธ๋งˆ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์•„๋‚ ๋กœ๊ทธ-๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๋™์ž‘์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ ์ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜์ฃผ๊ธฐ ์ง€์—ฐ ์ฐจ๋™ ์ž…๋ ฅ์„ ๋นผ์„œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ 2๋ฐฐ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ DAC์˜ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ์ปคํŒจ์‹œํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ปคํŒจ์‹œํ„ฐ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์ „์••์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด์—์„œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ปคํŒจ์‹œํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ฆํญ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ˆ˜๋ฐฐ์˜ ์ด๋“์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ปคํŒจ์‹œํ„ฐ, ํƒ€์ด๋ฐ, ์ „๋ฅ˜ ์†Œ๋ชจ ์—†์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ณ„๋‹ค๋ฅธ trade-off ์—†์ด ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ฆํญ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŠธ๋ฆฌํ”Œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋‹ฌ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์žก์Œ ๋ถ„์„ ๋˜ํ•œ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ readout ํšŒ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์ „์••์ด 1.8V์ธ 0.18 m CMOS ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  single-ended capacitive MEMS ํŠธ๋žœ์Šค๋“€์„œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฅ˜ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Ÿ‰์€ 520 ฮผA ์ด๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœํฐ์€ A-weighted ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋Œ€ ์žก์Œ ๋น„๋Š” 62.1 dBA, ์Œํ–ฅ ๊ณผ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ์ง€์ ์€ 115 dB SPL์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์นฉ์˜ die size๋Š” 0.98ใ€–"mm" ใ€—^2 ์ด๋‹ค.A triple-sampling ฮ”ฮฃ ADC can replace the programmable-gain amplifier commonly used in the readout circuit for a digital capacitive MEMS microphone. The input voltage can then be multiplied by subtracting a further half-period delayed differential input and using the feedback capacitor of the DAC as a sampling capacitor. This triple-sampling technique results in a readout circuit with sensitivity and noise performance comparable to recent designs, but with a reduced power requirement. CMRR improvement is achieved by subtracting differential inputs and superior noise performance compare to conventional structure, as amplifier noise and DAC kT/C noise is not amplified by triple-sampling structure while the signal is increased by its gain. Triple-sampling also can be operated as a single-to-differential circuit. A MEMS microphone incorporating this readout circuit, fabricated in a 0.18ฮผm CMOS process, achieved an A-weighted SNR of 62.1 dBA at 94 dB SPL with 520 ฮผA current consumption, to which triple-sampling was shown to contribute 4.5 dBA.CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 MOTIVATION 1 1.1.1 MEMS MICROPHONE TRENDS 1 1.1.2 TYPE OF MEMS MICROPHONES 4 1.1.3 PREVIOUS WORKS 7 1.2 MEMS MICROPHONE BASIC TERMS 9 1.3 THESIS ORGANIZATION 12 CHAPTER 2 SYSTEM OVERVIEW 13 2.1 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE 13 CHAPTER 3 INTERFACE CIRCUITS AND POWER MANAGEMENT CIRCUITS 16 3.1 PSEUDO-DIFFERENTIAL SOURCE FOLLOWER 17 3.2 CHARGE PUMP 19 3.3 LOW DROPOUT REGULATOR 22 3.3.1 DESIGN CONSIDERATION OF LOW DROPOUT REGULATOR 22 3.3.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF LOW DROPOUT REGULATOR 26 CHAPTER 4 TRIPLE-SAMPLING DELTA-SIGMA ADC 31 4.1 BASIC OF DELTA-SIGMA ADC 31 4.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF TRIPLE-SAMPLING DELTA-SIGMA MODULATOR 37 4.2.1 CONVENTIONAL 1ST INTEGRATOR STRUCTURE 37 4.2.2 CROSS-SAMPLING 1ST INTEGRATOR 40 4.2.3 TRIPLE-SAMPLING 1ST INTEGRATOR 43 4.2.4 STF ANALYSIS OF TRIPLE-SAMPLING 1ST INTEGRATOR 47 4.2.5 THERMAL NOISE ANALYSIS OF TRIPLE-SAMPLING 1ST INTEGRATOR 51 4.2 CIRCUIT IMPLEMENTATION OF DELTA-SIGMA ADC 57 CHAPTER 5 MEASUREMENT RESULTS 64 5.1 MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT 64 5.2 MEASUREMENT RESULTS 67 5.3 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 72 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION 74 BIBLIOGRAPHY 76 ํ•œ๊ธ€์ดˆ๋ก 79๋ฐ•

    Interface Circuits for Microsensor Integrated Systems

    Get PDF
    ca. 200 words; this text will present the book in all promotional forms (e.g. flyers). Please describe the book in straightforward and consumer-friendly terms. [Recent advances in sensing technologies, especially those for Microsensor Integrated Systems, have led to several new commercial applications. Among these, low voltage and low power circuit architectures have gained growing attention, being suitable for portable long battery life devices. The aim is to improve the performances of actual interface circuits and systems, both in terms of voltage mode and current mode, in order to overcome the potential problems due to technology scaling and different technology integrations. Related problems, especially those concerning parasitics, lead to a severe interface design attention, especially concerning the analog front-end and novel and smart architecture must be explored and tested, both at simulation and prototype level. Moreover, the growing demand for autonomous systems gets even harder the interface design due to the need of energy-aware cost-effective circuit interfaces integrating, where possible, energy harvesting solutions. The objective of this Special Issue is to explore the potential solutions to overcome actual limitations in sensor interface circuits and systems, especially those for low voltage and low power Microsensor Integrated Systems. The present Special Issue aims to present and highlight the advances and the latest novel and emergent results on this topic, showing best practices, implementations and applications. The Guest Editors invite to submit original research contributions dealing with sensor interfacing related to this specific topic. Additionally, application oriented and review papers are encouraged.

    Ultra-low-power circuits and systems for wearable and implantable medical devices

    Get PDF
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (pages 219-231).Advances in circuits, sensors, and energy storage elements have opened up many new possibilities in the health industry. In the area of wearable devices, the miniaturization of electronics has spurred the rapid development of wearable vital signs, activity, and fitness monitors. Maximizing the time between battery recharge places stringent requirements on power consumption by the device. For implantable devices, the situation is exacerbated by the fact that energy storage capacity is limited by volume constraints, and frequent battery replacement via surgery is undesirable. In this case, the design of energy-efficient circuits and systems becomes even more crucial. This thesis explores the design of energy-efficient circuits and systems for two medical applications. The first half of the thesis focuses on the design and implementation of an ultra-low-power, mixed-signal front-end for a wearable ECG monitor in a 0.18pm CMOS process. A mixed-signal architecture together with analog circuit optimizations enable ultra-low-voltage operation at 0.6V which provides power savings through voltage scaling, and ensures compatibility with state-of-the-art DSPs. The fully-integrated front-end consumes just 2.9[mu]W, which is two orders of magnitude lower than commercially available parts. The second half of this thesis focuses on ultra-low-power system design and energy-efficient neural stimulation for a proof-of-concept fully-implantable cochlear implant. First, implantable acoustic sensing is demonstrated by sensing the motion of a human cadaveric middle ear with a piezoelectric sensor. Second, alternate energy-efficient electrical stimulation waveforms are investigated to reduce neural stimulation power when compared to the conventional rectangular waveform. The energy-optimal waveform is analyzed using a computational nerve fiber model, and validated with in-vivo ECAP recordings in the auditory nerve of two cats and with psychophysical tests in two human cochlear implant users. Preliminary human subject testing shows that charge and energy savings of 20-30% and 15-35% respectively are possible with alternative waveforms. A system-on-chip comprising the sensor interface, reconfigurable sound processor, and arbitrary-waveform neural stimulator is implemented in a 0.18[mu]m high-voltage CMOS process to demonstrate the feasibility of this system. The sensor interface and sound processor consume just 12[mu]W of power, representing just 2% of the overall system power which is dominated by stimulation. As a result, the energy savings from using alternative stimulation waveforms transfer directly to the system.by Marcus Yip.Ph.D
    corecore