4,034 research outputs found
Perspectives for proof unwinding by programming languages techniques
In this chapter, we propose some future directions of work, potentially
beneficial to Mathematics and its foundations, based on the recent import of
methodology from the theory of programming languages into proof theory. This
scientific essay, written for the audience of proof theorists as well as the
working mathematician, is not a survey of the field, but rather a personal view
of the author who hopes that it may inspire future and fellow researchers
Logic-Based Analogical Reasoning and Learning
Analogy-making is at the core of human intelligence and creativity with
applications to such diverse tasks as commonsense reasoning, learning, language
acquisition, and story telling. This paper contributes to the foundations of
artificial general intelligence by developing an abstract algebraic framework
for logic-based analogical reasoning and learning in the setting of logic
programming. The main idea is to define analogy in terms of modularity and to
derive abstract forms of concrete programs from a `known' source domain which
can then be instantiated in an `unknown' target domain to obtain analogous
programs. To this end, we introduce algebraic operations for syntactic program
composition and concatenation and illustrate, by giving numerous examples, that
programs have nice decompositions. Moreover, we show how composition gives rise
to a qualitative notion of syntactic program similarity. We then argue that
reasoning and learning by analogy is the task of solving analogical proportions
between logic programs. Interestingly, our work suggests a close relationship
between modularity, generalization, and analogy which we believe should be
explored further in the future. In a broader sense, this paper is a first step
towards an algebraic and mainly syntactic theory of logic-based analogical
reasoning and learning in knowledge representation and reasoning systems, with
potential applications to fundamental AI-problems like commonsense reasoning
and computational learning and creativity
Hilbert's Program Then and Now
Hilbert's program was an ambitious and wide-ranging project in the philosophy
and foundations of mathematics. In order to "dispose of the foundational
questions in mathematics once and for all, "Hilbert proposed a two-pronged
approach in 1921: first, classical mathematics should be formalized in
axiomatic systems; second, using only restricted, "finitary" means, one should
give proofs of the consistency of these axiomatic systems. Although Godel's
incompleteness theorems show that the program as originally conceived cannot be
carried out, it had many partial successes, and generated important advances in
logical theory and meta-theory, both at the time and since. The article
discusses the historical background and development of Hilbert's program, its
philosophical underpinnings and consequences, and its subsequent development
and influences since the 1930s.Comment: 43 page
Modeling of Phenomena and Dynamic Logic of Phenomena
Modeling of complex phenomena such as the mind presents tremendous
computational complexity challenges. Modeling field theory (MFT) addresses
these challenges in a non-traditional way. The main idea behind MFT is to match
levels of uncertainty of the model (also, problem or theory) with levels of
uncertainty of the evaluation criterion used to identify that model. When a
model becomes more certain, then the evaluation criterion is adjusted
dynamically to match that change to the model. This process is called the
Dynamic Logic of Phenomena (DLP) for model construction and it mimics processes
of the mind and natural evolution. This paper provides a formal description of
DLP by specifying its syntax, semantics, and reasoning system. We also outline
links between DLP and other logical approaches. Computational complexity issues
that motivate this work are presented using an example of polynomial models
Graph Neural Networks Meet Neural-Symbolic Computing: A Survey and Perspective
Neural-symbolic computing has now become the subject of interest of both
academic and industry research laboratories. Graph Neural Networks (GNN) have
been widely used in relational and symbolic domains, with widespread
application of GNNs in combinatorial optimization, constraint satisfaction,
relational reasoning and other scientific domains. The need for improved
explainability, interpretability and trust of AI systems in general demands
principled methodologies, as suggested by neural-symbolic computing. In this
paper, we review the state-of-the-art on the use of GNNs as a model of
neural-symbolic computing. This includes the application of GNNs in several
domains as well as its relationship to current developments in neural-symbolic
computing.Comment: Updated version, draft of accepted IJCAI2020 Survey Pape
Expressing the Behavior of Three Very Different Concurrent Systems by Using Natural Extensions of Separation Logic
Separation Logic is a non-classical logic used to verify pointer-intensive
code. In this paper, however, we show that Separation Logic, along with its
natural extensions, can also be used as a specification language for
concurrent-system design. To do so, we express the behavior of three very
different concurrent systems: a Subway, a Stopwatch, and a 2x2 Switch. The
Subway is originally implemented in LUSTRE, the Stopwatch in Esterel, and the
2x2 Switch in Bluespec
- …