Towards Bridging the Gap between High-Level Reasoning and Execution on Robots

When reasoning about actions, e.g., by means of task planning or agent programming with Golog, the robot's actions are typically modeled on an abstract level, where complex actions such as picking up an object are treated as atomic primitives with deterministic effects and preconditions that only depend on the current state. However, when executing such an action on a robot it can no longer be seen as a primitive. Instead, action execution is a complex task involving multiple steps with additional temporal preconditions and timing constraints. Furthermore, the action may be noisy, e.g., producing erroneous sensing results and not always having the desired effects. While these aspects are typically ignored in reasoning tasks, they need to be dealt with during execution. In this thesis, we propose several approaches towards closing this gap.Comment: PhD Thesi

Plan Synthesis for Knowledge and Action Bases

We study plan synthesis for a variant of Knowledge and Action Bases (KABs), a rich, dynamic framework, where states are description logic (DL) knowledge bases (KBs) whose extensional part is manipulated by actions that possibly introduce new objects from an infinite domain. We show that plan existence over KABs is undecidable even under severe restrictions. We then focus on state-bounded KABs, a class for which plan existence is decidable, and provide sound and complete plan synthesis algorithms, which combine techniques based on standard planning, DL query answering, and finite-state abstraction. All results hold for any DL with decidable query answering. We finally show that for lightweight DLs, plan synthesis can be compiled into standard ADL planning

Rational Agents: Prioritized Goals, Goal Dynamics, and Agent Programming Languages with Declarative Goals

I introduce a specification language for modeling an agent's prioritized goals and their dynamics. I use the situation calculus along with Reiter's solution to the frame problem and predicates for describing agents' knowledge as my base formalism. I further enhance this language by introducing a new sort of infinite paths. Within this language, I discuss how to systematically specify prioritized goals and how to precisely describe the effects of actions on these goals. These actions include adoption and dropping of goals and subgoals. In this framework, an agent's intentions are formally specified as the prioritized intersection of her goals. The ``prioritized'' qualifier above means that the specification must respect the priority ordering of goals when choosing between two incompatible goals. I ensure that the agent's intentions are always consistent with each other and with her knowledge. I investigate two variants with different commitment strategies. Agents specified using the ``optimizing'' agent framework always try to optimize their intentions, while those specified in the ``committed'' agent framework will stick to their intentions even if opportunities to commit to higher priority goals arise when these goals are incompatible with their current intentions. For these, I study properties of prioritized goals and goal change. I also give a definition of subgoals, and prove properties about the goal-subgoal relationship. As an application, I develop a model for a Simple Rational Agent Programming Language (SR-APL) with declarative goals. SR-APL is based on the ``committed agent'' variant of this rich theory, and combines elements from Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) APLs and the situation calculus based ConGolog APL. Thus SR-APL supports prioritized goals and is grounded on a formal theory of goal change. It ensures that the agent's declarative goals and adopted plans are consistent with each other and with her knowledge. In doing this, I try to bridge the gap between agent theories and practical agent programming languages by providing a model and specification of an idealized BDI agent whose behavior is closer to what a rational agent does. I show that agents programmed in SR-APL satisfy some key rationality requirements

Simulation and statistical model-checking of logic-based multi-agent system models

This thesis presents SALMA (Simulation and Analysis of Logic-Based Multi- Agent Models), a new approach for simulation and statistical model checking of multi-agent system models. Statistical model checking is a relatively new branch of model-based approximative verification methods that help to overcome the well-known scalability problems of exact model checking. In contrast to existing solutions, SALMA specifies the mechanisms of the simulated system by means of logical axioms based upon the well-established situation calculus. Leveraging the resulting first-order logic structure of the system model, the simulation is coupled with a statistical model-checker that uses a first-order variant of time-bounded linear temporal logic (LTL) for describing properties. This is combined with a procedural and process-based language for describing agent behavior. Together, these parts create a very expressive framework for modeling and verification that allows direct fine-grained reasoning about the agents’ interaction with each other and with their (physical) environment. SALMA extends the classical situation calculus and linear temporal logic (LTL) with means to address the specific requirements of multi-agent simulation models. In particular, cyber-physical domains are considered where the agents interact with their physical environment. Among other things, the thesis describes a generic situation calculus axiomatization that encompasses sensing and information transfer in multi agent systems, for instance sensor measurements or inter-agent messages. The proposed model explicitly accounts for real-time constraints and stochastic effects that are inevitable in cyber-physical systems. In order to make SALMA’s statistical model checking facilities usable also for more complex problems, a mechanism for the efficient on-the-fly evaluation of first-order LTL properties was developed. In particular, the presented algorithm uses an interval-based representation of the formula evaluation state together with several other optimization techniques to avoid unnecessary computation. Altogether, the goal of this thesis was to create an approach for simulation and statistical model checking of multi-agent systems that builds upon well-proven logical and statistical foundations, but at the same time takes a pragmatic software engineering perspective that considers factors like usability, scalability, and extensibility. In fact, experience gained during several small to mid-sized experiments that are presented in this thesis suggest that the SALMA approach seems to be able to live up to these expectations.In dieser Dissertation wird SALMA (Simulation and Analysis of Logic-Based Multi-Agent Models) vorgestellt, ein im Rahmen dieser Arbeit entwickelter Ansatz für die Simulation und die statistische Modellprüfung (Model Checking) von Multiagentensystemen. Der Begriff „Statistisches Model Checking” beschreibt modellbasierte approximative Verifikationsmethoden, die insbesondere dazu eingesetzt werden können, um den unvermeidlichen Skalierbarkeitsproblemen von exakten Methoden zu entgehen. Im Gegensatz zu bisherigen Ansätzen werden in SALMA die Mechanismen des simulierten Systems mithilfe logischer Axiome beschrieben, die auf dem etablierten Situationskalkül aufbauen. Die dadurch entstehende prädikatenlogische Struktur des Systemmodells wird ausgenutzt um ein Model Checking Modul zu integrieren, das seinerseits eine prädikatenlogische Variante der linearen temporalen Logik (LTL) verwendet. In Kombination mit einer prozeduralen und prozessorientierten Sprache für die Beschreibung von Agentenverhalten entsteht eine ausdrucksstarke und flexible Plattform für die Modellierung und Verifikation von Multiagentensystemen. Sie ermöglicht eine direkte und feingranulare Beschreibung der Interaktionen sowohl zwischen Agenten als auch von Agenten mit ihrer (physischen) Umgebung. SALMA erweitert den klassischen Situationskalkül und die lineare temporale Logik (LTL) um Elemente und Konzepte, die auf die spezifischen Anforderungen bei der Simulation und Modellierung von Multiagentensystemen ausgelegt sind. Insbesondere werden cyber-physische Systeme (CPS) unterstützt, in denen Agenten mit ihrer physischen Umgebung interagieren. Unter anderem wird eine generische, auf dem Situationskalkül basierende, Axiomatisierung von Prozessen beschrieben, in denen Informationen innerhalb von Multiagentensystemen transferiert werden – beispielsweise in Form von Sensor- Messwerten oder Netzwerkpaketen. Dabei werden ausdrücklich die unvermeidbaren stochastischen Effekte und Echtzeitanforderungen in cyber-physischen Systemen berücksichtigt. Um statistisches Model Checking mit SALMA auch für komplexere Problemstellungen zu ermöglichen, wurde ein Mechanismus für die effiziente Auswertung von prädikatenlogischen LTL-Formeln entwickelt. Insbesondere beinhaltet der vorgestellte Algorithmus eine Intervall-basierte Repräsentation des Auswertungszustands, sowie einige andere Optimierungsansätze zur Vermeidung von unnötigen Berechnungsschritten. Insgesamt war es das Ziel dieser Dissertation, eine Lösung für Simulation und statistisches Model Checking zu schaffen, die einerseits auf fundierten logischen und statistischen Grundlagen aufbaut, auf der anderen Seite jedoch auch pragmatischen Gesichtspunkten wie Benutzbarkeit oder Erweiterbarkeit genügt. Tatsächlich legen erste Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen aus mehreren kleinen bis mittelgroßen Experimenten nahe, dass SALMA diesen Zielen gerecht wird

Risk-minimizing program execution in robotic domains

Thesis (Sc. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 153-161).In this thesis, we argue that autonomous robots operating in hostile and uncertain environments can improve robustness by computing and reasoning explicitly about risk. Autonomous robots with a keen sensitivity to risk can be trusted with critical missions, such as exploring deep space and assisting on the battlefield. We introduce a novel, risk-minimizing approach to program execution that utilizes program flexibility and estimation of risk in order to make runtime decisions that minimize the probability of program failure. Our risk-minimizing executive, called Murphy, utilizes two forms of program flexibility, 1) flexible scheduling of activity timing, and 2) redundant choice between subprocedures, in order to minimize two forms of program risk, 1) exceptions arising from activity failures, and 2) exceptions arising from timing constraint violations in a program. Murphy takes two inputs, a program written in a nondeterministic variant of the Reactive Model-based Programming Language (RMPL) and a set of stochastic activity failure models, one for each activity in a program, and computes two outputs, a risk-minimizing decision policy and value function. The decision policy informs Murphy which decisions to make at runtime in order to minimize risk, while the value function quantifies risk. In order to execute with low latency, Murphy computes the decision policy and value function offline, as a compilation step prior to program execution. In this thesis, we develop three approaches to RMPL program execution. First, we develop an approach that is guaranteed to minimize risk. For this approach, we reason probabilistically about risk by framing program execution as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Next, we develop an approach that avoids risk altogether. For this approach, we frame program execution as a novel form of constraint-based temporal reasoning. Finally, we develop an execution approach that trades optimality in risk avoidance for tractability. For this approach, we leverage prior work in hierarchical decomposition of MDPs in order to mitigate complexity. We benchmark the tractability of each approach on a set of representative RMPL programs, and we demonstrate the applicability of the approach on a humanoid robot simulator.by Robert T. Effinger, IV.Sc.D

Cross organisational compatible workflows generation and execution

With the development of internet and electronics, the demand for electronic and online commerce has increased. This has, in turn, increased the demand for business process automation. Workflow has established itself as the technology used for business process automation. Since business organisations have to work in coordination with many other business organisations in order to succeed in business, the workflows of business organisations are expected to collaborate with those of other business organisations. Collaborating organisations can only proceed in business if they have compatible workflows. Therefore, there is a need for cross organisational workflow collaboration. The dynamism and complexity of online and electronic business and high demand from the market leave the workflows prone to frequent changes. If a workflow changes, it has to be re-engineered as well as reconciled with the workflows of the collaborating organisations. To avoid the continuous re-engineering and reconciliation of workflows, and to reuse the existing units of work done, the focus has recently shifted from modeling workflows to automatic workflow generation. Workflows must proceed to runtime execution, otherwise, the effort invested in the build time workflow modeling is wasted. Therefore, workflow management and collaboration systems must support workflow enactment and runtime workflow collaboration. Although substantial research has been done in build-time workflow collaboration, automatic workflow generation, workflow enactment and runtime workflow collaboration, the integration of these highly inter-dependent aspects of workflow has not been considered in the literature. The research work presented in this thesis investigates the integration of these different aspects. The main focus of the research presented in this thesis is the creation of a framework that is able to generate multiple sets of compatible workflows for multiple collaborating organisations, from their OWLS process definitions and high level goals. The proposed framework also supports runtime enactment and runtime collaboration of the generated workflows

A belief-desire-intention architechture with a logic-based planner for agents in stochastic domains

This dissertation investigates high-level decision making for agents that are both goal and utility driven. We develop a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) planner which is an extension of an agent programming language called DTGolog, itself an extension of the Golog language. Golog is based on a logic for reasoning about action—the situation calculus. A POMDP planner on its own cannot cope well with dynamically changing environments and complicated goals. This is exactly a strength of the belief-desire-intention (BDI) model: BDI theory has been developed to design agents that can select goals intelligently, dynamically abandon and adopt new goals, and yet commit to intentions for achieving goals. The contribution of this research is twofold: (1) developing a relational POMDP planner for cognitive robotics, (2) specifying a preliminary BDI architecture that can deal with stochasticity in action and perception, by employing the planner.ComputingM. Sc. (Computer Science

Agent programming in the cognitive era

It is claimed that, in the nascent ‘Cognitive Era’, intelligent systems will be trained using machine learning techniques rather than programmed by software developers. A contrary point of view argues that machine learning has limitations, and, taken in isolation, cannot form the basis of autonomous systems capable of intelligent behaviour in complex environments. In this paper, we explore the contributions that agent-oriented programming can make to the development of future intelligent systems. We briefly review the state of the art in agent programming, focussing particularly on BDI-based agent programming languages, and discuss previous work on integrating AI techniques (including machine learning) in agent-oriented programming. We argue that the unique strengths of BDI agent languages provide an ideal framework for integrating the wide range of AI capabilities necessary for progress towards the next-generation of intelligent systems. We identify a range of possible approaches to integrating AI into a BDI agent architecture. Some of these approaches, e.g., ‘AI as a service’, exploit immediate synergies between rapidly maturing AI techniques and agent programming, while others, e.g., ‘AI embedded into agents’ raise more fundamental research questions, and we sketch a programme of research directed towards identifying the most appropriate ways of integrating AI capabilities into agent programs