A Distributed algorithm to find Hamiltonian cycles in Gnp random graphs

In this paper, we present a distributed algorithm to find Hamiltonian cycles in random binomial graphs Gnp. The algorithm works on a synchronous distributed setting by first creating a small cycle, then covering almost all vertices in the graph with several disjoint paths, and finally patching these paths and the uncovered vertices to the cycle. Our analysis shows that, with high probability, our algorithm is able to find a Hamiltonian cycle in Gnp when p_n=omega(sqrt{log n}/n^{1/4}). Moreover, we conduct an average case complexity analysis that shows that our algorithm terminates in expected sub-linear time, namely in O(n^{3/4+epsilon}) pulses.Postprint (published version

Hamiltonian cycles in faulty random geometric networks

In this paper we analyze the Hamiltonian properties of faulty random networks. This consideration is of interest when considering wireless broadcast networks. A random geometric network is a graph whose vertices correspond to points uniformly and independently distributed in the unit square, and whose edges connect any pair of vertices if their distance is below some specified bound. A faulty random geometric network is a random geometric network whose vertices or edges fail at random. Algorithms to find Hamiltonian cycles in faulty random geometric networks are presented.Postprint (published version

Finding long cycles in graphs

We analyze the problem of discovering long cycles inside a graph. We propose and test two algorithms for this task. The first one is based on recent advances in statistical mechanics and relies on a message passing procedure. The second follows a more standard Monte Carlo Markov Chain strategy. Special attention is devoted to Hamiltonian cycles of (non-regular) random graphs of minimal connectivity equal to three

Distributed Testing of Excluded Subgraphs

We study property testing in the context of distributed computing, under the classical CONGEST model. It is known that testing whether a graph is triangle-free can be done in a constant number of rounds, where the constant depends on how far the input graph is from being triangle-free. We show that, for every connected 4-node graph H, testing whether a graph is H-free can be done in a constant number of rounds too. The constant also depends on how far the input graph is from being H-free, and the dependence is identical to the one in the case of testing triangles. Hence, in particular, testing whether a graph is K_4-free, and testing whether a graph is C_4-free can be done in a constant number of rounds (where K_k denotes the k-node clique, and C_k denotes the k-node cycle). On the other hand, we show that testing K_k-freeness and C_k-freeness for k>4 appear to be much harder. Specifically, we investigate two natural types of generic algorithms for testing H-freeness, called DFS tester and BFS tester. The latter captures the previously known algorithm to test the presence of triangles, while the former captures our generic algorithm to test the presence of a 4-node graph pattern H. We prove that both DFS and BFS testers fail to test K_k-freeness and C_k-freeness in a constant number of rounds for k>4