23 research outputs found

    IEEE 802.11ax: challenges and requirements for future high efficiency wifi

    Get PDF
    The popularity of IEEE 802.11 based wireless local area networks (WLANs) has increased significantly in recent years because of their ability to provide increased mobility, flexibility, and ease of use, with reduced cost of installation and maintenance. This has resulted in massive WLAN deployment in geographically limited environments that encompass multiple overlapping basic service sets (OBSSs). In this article, we introduce IEEE 802.11ax, a new standard being developed by the IEEE 802.11 Working Group, which will enable efficient usage of spectrum along with an enhanced user experience. We expose advanced technological enhancements proposed to improve the efficiency within high density WLAN networks and explore the key challenges to the upcoming amendment.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    A Survey on Multi-AP Coordination Approaches over Emerging WLANs: Future Directions and Open Challenges

    Full text link
    Recent advancements in wireless local area network (WLAN) technology include IEEE 802.11be and 802.11ay, often known as Wi-Fi 7 and WiGig, respectively. The goal of these developments is to provide Extremely High Throughput (EHT) and low latency to meet the demands of future applications like as 8K videos, augmented and virtual reality, the Internet of Things, telesurgery, and other developing technologies. IEEE 802.11be includes new features such as 320 MHz bandwidth, multi-link operation, Multi-user Multi-Input Multi-Output, orthogonal frequency-division multiple access, and Multiple-Access Point (multi-AP) coordination (MAP-Co) to achieve EHT. With the increase in the number of overlapping APs and inter-AP interference, researchers have focused on studying MAP-Co approaches for coordinated transmission in IEEE 802.11be, making MAP-Co a key feature of future WLANs. Moreover, similar issues may arise in EHF bands WLAN, particularly for standards beyond IEEE 802.11ay. This has prompted researchers to investigate the implementation of MAP-Co over future 802.11ay WLANs. Thus, in this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art MAP-Co features and their shortcomings concerning emerging WLAN. Finally, we discuss several novel future directions and open challenges for MAP-Co.Comment: The reason for the replacement of the previous version of the paper is due to a change in the author's list. As a result, a new version has been created, which serves as the final draft version before acceptance. This updated version contains all the latest changes and improvements made to the pape

    An optimization of network performance in IEEE 802.11ax dense networks

    Get PDF
    The paper focuses on the optimization of IEEE 802.11ax dense networks. The results were obtained with the use of the NS-3 simulator. Various network topologies were analyzed and compared. The advantage of using MSDU and MPDU aggregations in a dense network environment was shown. The process of improving the network performance for changes in the transmitter power value, CCA Threshold, and antenna gain was presented. The positive influence of BSS coloring mechanism on overal network efficiency was revealed. The influence of receiver sensitivity on network performance was determined

    Insights on the Next Generation WLAN: High Experiences (HEX)

    Full text link
    Wireless local area network (WLAN) witnesses a very fast growth in the past 20 years by taking the maximum throughput as the key technical objective. However, the quality of experience (QoE) is the most important concern of wireless network users. In this article, we point out that poor QoE is the most challenging problem of the current WLAN, and further analyze the key technical problems that cause the poor QoE of WLAN, including fully distributed networking architecture, chaotic random access, awkward ``high capability'', coarse-grained QoS architecture, ubiquitous and complicated interference, ``no place'' for artificial intelligence (AI), and heavy burden of standard evolving. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to point out that poor QoE is the most challenging problem of the current WLAN, and the first work to systematically analyze the technical problems that cause the poor QoE of WLAN. We highly suggest that achieving high experiences (HEX) be the key objective of the next generation WLAN

    ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ๋™์‹œ ์ „์†ก ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2017. 8. ์ตœ์„ฑํ˜„.๋ฌด์„  ํ†ต์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, Wi-Fi๋กœ ํ”ํžˆ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ IEEE 802.11 ํ‘œ์ค€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ(WLAN, Wireless Local Area Network)์€ ์–ด๋””์—์„œ๋‚˜ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ ๊ฑฐ๋“ญ๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ์˜ ๊ณ ๋ฐ€ํ™”, ์ฆ‰ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ AP(Access Point)์™€ STA(station)๋“ค์ด ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ์ฑ„๋„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ•œ ๋‹จ๋ง์ด ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ œํ•œ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋‘๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์ „์†ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ ํšจ์œจ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ์ž์›์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์žฌ์‚ฌ์šฉ(spatial reuse)์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ํŠน์ • ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋งŽ์€ ๋™์‹œ ์ „์†ก์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ด์Šˆ๋กœ ์ž๋ฆฌ๋งค๊น€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋™์‹œ ์ „์†ก์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ „๋žต์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. (i) ๋งค์ฒด์ ‘๊ทผ์ œ์–ด(MAC, Medium Access Control) ๊ณ„์ธต์˜ ACK(Acknowledgment) ๋ฐ CTS(Clear-To-Send) ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†ก์‹  ์ „๋ ฅ ์ œ์–ด, (ii) ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’(CST, Carrier-Sense Threshold) ์ ์‘, (iii) ๋™์‹œ ์†ก์‹  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์‹  (STR, Simultaneous Transmit and Receiver), ์ฆ‰ ๋™์ผ๋Œ€์—ญ ์ „์ด์ค‘ ํ†ต์‹ (in-band full duplex). ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋™์ผ ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ฐ„์„ญ(CCI, Co-Channel Interference)๋ณด๋‹ค ๋œ ์กฐ๋ช…๋˜์–ด ์™”๋˜ MAC ACK ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” CCI์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ™•๋ฅ ์  ๊ธฐํ•˜ ๋ถ„์„(stochastic geometry analysis)์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ACK ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ์†ก์‹  ์ „๋ ฅ ์กฐ์ ˆ์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋™์  ACK ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์†ก์‹  ์ „๋ ฅ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ธ Quiet ACK(QACK)์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. QACK์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ˆ˜์‹  ์ค‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” CCI ๊ฒ€์ถœ ๋ฐ CCI ์ „๋ ฅ ์ถ”์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ACK ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ „์†ก ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ์†ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ACK ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ์†ก์‹  ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด, QACK์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ CTS ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์†ก์‹  ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋™์‹œ ์ „์†ก์ด ์‹œ๋„๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” Quiet CTS(QCTS)๋ผ๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. QACK์˜ ์‹คํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ SDR(Software-Defined Radio) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์•ฝ 1.5๋ฐฐ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์œจ์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ QACK ๋ฐ QCTS์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ns-3๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ๋™์‹œ์— ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋™์‹œ ์ „์†ก์ด ์‹œ๋„๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ฐ„์„ญ์›(interferer node)๊ณผ ๋ชฉ์  ๋…ธ๋“œ(destination node)์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ CST๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” โ€‹โ€‹CST ์ ์‘ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, FACT(Fine-grained Adaptation of Carrier-sense Threshold)๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ํ‘œ์ค€์—์„œ ์ด๋ฏธ ์ •์˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ƒ์šฉ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ FACT ๋ฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ CST ์ ์‘ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋™์ž‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” CCA(Clear Channel Assessment) ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ—ค๋“œ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ns-3 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋น„๊ตํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ „์ฒด ์ˆ˜์œจ์„ ํฐ ํญ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ์—์„œ STR์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด MAC ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ, ์ฆ‰ MASTaR(MAC Protocol for Access points in Simultaneous Transmit and Receive mode)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ ํ‘œ์ค€์„ ์ค€์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ MASTaR ๋™์ž‘์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์ธต์—์„œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ„์„ญ ์ƒ์‡„(SIC, Self-Interference Cancellation) ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ์‹คํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ด‘์„  ์ถ”์ (3D-ray tracing) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ฌด์„ ๋žœ MAC ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ตœ๋Œ€ 2.58๋ฐฐ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์œจ์ด MASTaR๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด, ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ACK ๋ฐ CTS ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ์†ก์‹  ์ „๋ ฅ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ CST ์ ์‘ ๋ฐ STR์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๋ฐ ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์˜ ์‹คํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ•ด์„, 3์ฐจ์› ๊ด‘์„  ์ถ”์ , ns-3 ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ˆ˜์ค€(system-level) ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜, SDR ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž… ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ž…์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค.With increasing demand for wireless connectivity, IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN), a.k.a. Wi-Fi, has become ubiquitous and continues to grow in number. This leads to the high density of WLAN, where many access points (APs) and client stations (STAs) operate on the same frequency channel. In a densely deployed WLAN, greater emphasis is placed on the importance of spatial reuse as well as spectral efficiency. In other words, it is of particular importance how many simultaneous transmissions are possible in a given area. In this dissertation, we consider the following three strategies to increase the number of successful simultaneous transmissions: (i) Transmit power control for medium access control (MAC) acknowledgment (ACK) and clear-to-send (CTS) frames, (ii) carrier sense threshold (CST) adaptation, and (iii) simultaneous transmit and receive (STR), i.e., in-band full-duplex communication. First, this dissertation sheds light on the co-channel interference (CCI) caused by 802.11 MAC ACK frames, which has been less studied than the CCI caused by data frames. Based on stochastic geometry analysis, we propose Quiet ACK (QACK), a dynamic transmit power control algorithm for ACK frames. Fine-grained transmit power adjustment is enabled by CCI detection and CCI power estimation in the middle of a data frame reception. A power control algorithm for clear-to-send (CTS) frame transmission, namely Quiet CTS (QCTS) is also proposed based on QACK. Our prototype using software-defined radio shows the feasibility and performance gain of QACK, i.e., 1.5X higher throughput than the legacy 802.11 WLAN. The performance of QACK and QCTS is further evaluated in more general WLAN environments via extensive simulations using ns-3. Second, a fine-grained CST adaptation method, which controls CST depending on both interferer and destination nodes, is proposed to improve spatial reuse in WLAN. The proposed method utilizes pre-defined functions in the WLAN standard, thus making itself easily implementable in commercial WLAN devices. Supplementary clear channel assessment (CCA) method is also proposed to further enhance network performance by reducing CCA overhead. The performance of the proposed methods is comparatively evaluated via ns-3 simulation. Simulation results show that the proposed methods significantly improve network throughput compared with the legacy method. Finally, a novel MAC protocol that enables STR in 802.11 WLAN, namely MASTaR, is proposed based on standard-compliant methods. Also, a digital self-interference cancellation (SIC) strategy is proposed to support the operation of MASTaR. The feasibility and the performance of MASTaR are extensively evaluated via 3D ray tracing-based simulation. The simulation results demonstrate that significant performance enhancement,e.g., up to 2.58X higher throughput than the current 802.11 MAC protocol, can be achieved by an STR-capable access point. In summary, we propose an algorithm for ACK and CTS transmission power control and two protocols each for CST adaptation and STR which enhance the efficiency of WLAN by enriching simultaneous transmission. The feasibility and the performance of the algorithm and protocols are demonstrated via various methodologies including numerical analysis, 3D ray-tracing, ns-3 based system-level simulation, and prototype using a software-defined radio.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Overview of Existing Approaches 3 1.2.1 Transmit power control for CCI reduction 3 1.2.2 CST adaptation for better spatial reuse 3 1.2.3 MAC protocol for STR in WLAN 4 1.3 Main Contributions 7 1.3.1 Quiet ACK: ACK Transmit Power Control 7 1.3.2 FACT: CST adaptation scheme 8 1.3.3 MASTaR: MAC protocol for STR in WLAN 8 1.4 Organization of the Dissertation 9 2 Quiet ACK: ACK Transmit Power Control in IEEE 802.11 WLANs 10 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Numerical Analysis 12 2.2.1 System Model 13 2.2.2 AISR Expansion by ACK Power Control 18 2.2.3 Optimization of ACK Outage Tolerance 19 2.3 QACK: Proposed ACK power Control 21 2.3.1 CCI Detection and CCI Power Estimation 22 2.3.2 Link Margin Estimation 26 2.3.3 ACK Power Adjustment 29 2.3.4 Conditional QACK Enabling/Disabling 30 2.4 Prototyping-Based Feasibility Evaluation 30 2.4.1 Feasibility of CCI Detection and CCI Power Estimation 30 2.4.2 Throughput Enhancement by QACK 33 2.5 Simulation-based Performance Evaluation 34 2.5.1 Two BSS Topology 35 2.5.2 Multiple BSS Environment 38 2.5.3 Coexistence with Legacy Devices 41 2.6 Quiet CTS: Proposed CTS Power Control 41 2.6.1 Problem Statement 41 2.6.2 CTS Power Control 42 2.6.3 Relationship with Quiet ACK 44 2.6.4 Simulation Results 45 2.7 Summary 48 3 FACT: Fine-Grained Adaptation of Carrier Sense Threshold in IEEE 802.11 WLANs 49 3.1 Introduction 49 3.2 Preliminaries 50 3.2.1 IEEE 802.11h Transmit Power Control (TPC) 50 3.2.2 IEEE 802.11ah Basic Service Set (BSS) Color 52 3.3 FACT: Proposed CST Adaptation Scheme 52 3.3.1 Basic Principle 53 3.3.2 Challenges and Solutions 54 3.3.3 Specification 54 3.3.4 Transmit Power Adjustment 56 3.3.5 Conditional Update of CST 57 3.4 Blind CCA and Backoff Compensation 57 3.4.1 Blind CCA 58 3.4.2 Backoff Compensation 59 3.5 Performance Evaluation 59 3.6 Summary 63 4 MASTaR: MAC Protocol for Access Points in Simultaneous Transmit and Receive Mode 64 4.1 Introduction 64 4.2 Preliminaries 68 4.2.1 Explicit Block ACK 68 4.2.2 Capture Effect 69 4.3 MASTaR: Proposed MAC Protocol 70 4.3.1 PTX Identification 70 4.3.2 Initial Training 73 4.3.3 Link Map Management 73 4.3.4 Secondary Transmission 74 4.4 Feasibility Study 76 4.4.1 Analog SIC and Channel Modeling 76 4.4.2 Digital SIC for WLAN 79 4.5 Performance Evaluation 83 4.5.1 Simulation with UDP Data Traffic 87 4.5.2 Simulation with Voice and Data Traffic 100 4.6 Summary 102 5 Concluding Remarks 103 5.1 Research Contributions 103 5.2 Future Work 104 Abstract (In Korean) 110Docto
    corecore