1,659 research outputs found
Answer Sets for Logic Programs with Arbitrary Abstract Constraint Atoms
In this paper, we present two alternative approaches to defining answer sets
for logic programs with arbitrary types of abstract constraint atoms (c-atoms).
These approaches generalize the fixpoint-based and the level mapping based
answer set semantics of normal logic programs to the case of logic programs
with arbitrary types of c-atoms. The results are four different answer set
definitions which are equivalent when applied to normal logic programs. The
standard fixpoint-based semantics of logic programs is generalized in two
directions, called answer set by reduct and answer set by complement. These
definitions, which differ from each other in the treatment of
negation-as-failure (naf) atoms, make use of an immediate consequence operator
to perform answer set checking, whose definition relies on the notion of
conditional satisfaction of c-atoms w.r.t. a pair of interpretations. The other
two definitions, called strongly and weakly well-supported models, are
generalizations of the notion of well-supported models of normal logic programs
to the case of programs with c-atoms. As for the case of fixpoint-based
semantics, the difference between these two definitions is rooted in the
treatment of naf atoms. We prove that answer sets by reduct (resp. by
complement) are equivalent to weakly (resp. strongly) well-supported models of
a program, thus generalizing the theorem on the correspondence between stable
models and well-supported models of a normal logic program to the class of
programs with c-atoms. We show that the newly defined semantics coincide with
previously introduced semantics for logic programs with monotone c-atoms, and
they extend the original answer set semantics of normal logic programs. We also
study some properties of answer sets of programs with c-atoms, and relate our
definitions to several semantics for logic programs with aggregates presented
in the literature
Rewriting recursive aggregates in answer set programming: back to monotonicity
Aggregation functions are widely used in answer set programming for representing and reasoning on knowledge involving sets of objects collectively. Current implementations simplify the structure of programs in order to optimize the overall performance. In particular, aggregates are rewritten into simpler forms known as monotone aggregates. Since the evaluation of normal programs with monotone aggregates is in general on a lower complexity level than the evaluation of normal programs with arbitrary aggregates, any faithful translation function must introduce disjunction in rule heads in some cases. However, no function of this kind is known. The paper closes this gap by introducing a polynomial, faithful, and modular translation for rewriting common aggregation functions into the simpler form accepted by current solvers. A prototype system allows for experimenting with arbitrary recursive aggregates, which are also supported in the recent version 4.5 of the grounder gringo, using the methods presented in this paper
Towards a unified theory of logic programming semantics: Level mapping characterizations of selector generated models
Currently, the variety of expressive extensions and different semantics
created for logic programs with negation is diverse and heterogeneous, and
there is a lack of comprehensive comparative studies which map out the
multitude of perspectives in a uniform way. Most recently, however, new
methodologies have been proposed which allow one to derive uniform
characterizations of different declarative semantics for logic programs with
negation. In this paper, we study the relationship between two of these
approaches, namely the level mapping characterizations due to [Hitzler and
Wendt 2005], and the selector generated models due to [Schwarz 2004]. We will
show that the latter can be captured by means of the former, thereby supporting
the claim that level mappings provide a very flexible framework which is
applicable to very diversely defined semantics.Comment: 17 page
Ultimate approximations in nonmonotonic knowledge representation systems
We study fixpoints of operators on lattices. To this end we introduce the
notion of an approximation of an operator. We order approximations by means of
a precision ordering. We show that each lattice operator O has a unique most
precise or ultimate approximation. We demonstrate that fixpoints of this
ultimate approximation provide useful insights into fixpoints of the operator
O.
We apply our theory to logic programming and introduce the ultimate
Kripke-Kleene, well-founded and stable semantics. We show that the ultimate
Kripke-Kleene and well-founded semantics are more precise then their standard
counterparts We argue that ultimate semantics for logic programming have
attractive epistemological properties and that, while in general they are
computationally more complex than the standard semantics, for many classes of
theories, their complexity is no worse.Comment: This paper was published in Principles of Knowledge Representation
and Reasoning, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference (KR2002
Stable Models of Formulas with Generalized Quantifiers (Preliminary Report)
Applications of answer set programming motivated various extensions of the stable model semantics, for instance, to allow aggregates or to facilitate interface with external ontology descriptions. We present a uniform, reductive view on these extensions by viewing them as special cases of formulas with generalized quantifiers. This is done by extending the first-order stable model semantics by Ferraris, Lee and Lifschitz to account for generalized quantifiers and then by reducing the individual extensions to this formalism
Stable Models of Formulas with Generalized Quantifiers (Preliminary Report)
Applications of answer set programming motivated various extensions of the stable model semantics, for instance, to allow aggregates or to facilitate interface with external ontology descriptions. We present a uniform, reductive view on these extensions by viewing them as special cases of formulas with generalized quantifiers. This is done by extending the first-order stable model semantics by Ferraris, Lee and Lifschitz to account for generalized quantifiers and then by reducing the individual extensions to this formalism
- …