Higher-level Knowledge, Rational and Social Levels Constraints of the Common Model of the Mind

In his famous 1982 paper, Allen Newell [22, 23] introduced the notion of knowledge level to indicate a level of analysis, and prediction, of the rational behavior of a cognitive articial agent. This analysis concerns the investigation about the availability of the agent knowledge, in order to pursue its own goals, and is based on the so-called Rationality Principle (an assumption according to which "an agent will use the knowledge it has of its environment to achieve its goals" [22, p. 17]. By using the Newell's own words: "To treat a system at the knowledge level is to treat it as having some knowledge, some goals, and believing it will do whatever is within its power to attain its goals, in so far as its knowledge indicates" [22, p. 13]. In the last decades, the importance of the knowledge level has been historically and system- atically downsized by the research area in cognitive architectures (CAs), whose interests have been mainly focused on the analysis and the development of mechanisms and the processes governing human and (articial) cognition. The knowledge level in CAs, however, represents a crucial level of analysis for the development of such articial general systems and therefore deserves greater research attention [17]. In the following, we will discuss areas of broad agree- ment and outline the main problematic aspects that should be faced within a Common Model of Cognition [12]. Such aspects, departing from an analysis at the knowledge level, also clearly impact both lower (e.g. representational) and higher (e.g. social) levels

Emotion in the Common Model of Cognition

Emotions play an important role in human cognition and therefore need to be present in the Common Model of Cognition. In this paper, the emotion working group focuses on functional aspects of emotions and describes what we believe are the points of interactions with the Common Model of Cognition. The present paper should not be viewed as a consensus of the group but rather as a first attempt to extract common and divergent aspects of different models of emotions and how they relate to the Common Model of Cognition

Higher-level Knowledge, Rational and Social Levels Constraints of the Common Model of the Mind

We present the input to the discussion about the computational framework known as Common Model of Cognition (CMC) from the working group dealing with the knowledge/rational/social levels. In particular, we present a list of the higher level constraints that should be addressed within such a general framework

Towards adaptive multi-robot systems: self-organization and self-adaptation

Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.The development of complex systems ensembles that operate in uncertain environments is a major challenge. The reason for this is that system designers are not able to fully specify the system during specification and development and before it is being deployed. Natural swarm systems enjoy similar characteristics, yet, being self-adaptive and being able to self-organize, these systems show beneficial emergent behaviour. Similar concepts can be extremely helpful for artificial systems, especially when it comes to multi-robot scenarios, which require such solution in order to be applicable to highly uncertain real world application. In this article, we present a comprehensive overview over state-of-the-art solutions in emergent systems, self-organization, self-adaptation, and robotics. We discuss these approaches in the light of a framework for multi-robot systems and identify similarities, differences missing links and open gaps that have to be addressed in order to make this framework possible

A hybrid cognitive architecture with primal affect and physiology

Though computational cognitive architectures have been used to study several processes associated with human behavior, the study of integration of affect and emotion in these processes has been relatively sparse. Theory from affective science and affective neuroscience can be used to systematically integrate affect into cognitive architectures, particularly in areas where cognitive system behavior is known to be associated with physiological structure and behavior. I introduce a unified theory and model of human behavior that integrates physiology and primal affect with cognitive processes in a cognitive architecture. This new architecture gives a more tractable, mechanistic way to simulate affect-cognition interactions to provide specific, quantitative predictions. It considers affect as a lower-level, functional process that interacts with cognitive processes (e.g., declarative memory) to result in emotional behavior. This formulation makes it more straightforward to connect these affective representations with other related moderating processes that may not specifically be considered as emotional (e.g., thirst or stress). An improved understanding of the architecture that constrains our behavior gives us a better opportunity to comprehend why we behave the way we do and how we can use this knowledge to recognize and construct a more ideal internal and external environment

Uma comparação entre arquiteturas cognitivas : análise teórica e prática

Orientador: Ricardo Ribeiro GudwinDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica e de ComputaçãoResumo: Este trabalho apresenta uma comparação teórica e prática entre três das mais populares arquiteturas cognitivas: SOAR, CLARION e LIDA. A comparação teórica é realizada com base em um conjunto de funções cognitivas supostamente existentes no ciclo cognitivo humano. A comparação prática é realizada aplicando-se um mesmo experimento em todas as arquiteturas, coletando alguns dados e comparando-as usando como base algumas métricas de qualidade de software. O objetivo é enfatizar semelhanças e diferenças entre os modelos e implementações, com o objetivo de aconselhar um novo usuário a escolher a arquitetura mais apropriada para uma certa aplicaçãoAbstract: This work presents a theoretical and practical comparison of three popular cognitive architectures: SOAR, CLARION, and LIDA. The theoretical comparison is performed based on a set of cognitive functions supposed to exist in the human cognitive cycle. The practical comparison is performed applying the same experiment in all architectures, collecting some data and comparing them using a set of software quality metrics as a basis. The aim is to emphasize similarities and differences among the models and implementations, with the purpose to advise a newcomer on how to choose the appropriated architecture for an applicationMestradoEngenharia de ComputaçãoMestre em Engenharia Elétric

Emotion in the Common Model of Cognition

Emotions play an important role in human cognition and therefore need to be present in the Common Model of Cognition. In this paper, the emotion working group focuses on functional aspects of emotions and describes what we believe are the points of interactions with the Common Model of Cognition. The present paper should not be viewed as a consensus of the group but rather as a first attempt to extract common and divergent aspects of different models of emotions and how they relate to the Common Model of Cognition

Méthodes d'apprentissage inspirées de l'humain pour un tuteur cognitif artificiel

Les systèmes tuteurs intelligents sont considérés comme un remarquable concentré de technologies qui permettent un processus d'apprentissage. Ces systèmes sont capables de jouer le rôle d'assistants voire même de tuteur humain. Afin d'y arriver, ces systèmes ont besoin de maintenir et d'utiliser une représentation interne de l'environnement. Ainsi, ils peuvent tenir compte des évènements passés et présents ainsi que de certains aspects socioculturels. Parallèlement à l'évolution dynamique de l'environnement, un agent STI doit évoluer en modifiant ses structures et en ajoutant de nouveaux phénomènes. Cette importante capacité d'adaptation est observée dans le cas de tuteurs humains. Les humains sont capables de gérer toutes ces complexités à l'aide de l'attention et du mécanisme de conscience (Baars B. J., 1983, 1988), et (Sloman, A and Chrisley, R., 2003). Toutefois, reconstruire et implémenter des capacités humaines dans un agent artificiel est loin des possibilités actuelles de la connaissance de même que des machines les plus sophistiquées. Pour réaliser un comportement humanoïde dans une machine, ou simplement pour mieux comprendre l'adaptabilité et la souplesse humaine, nous avons à développer un mécanisme d'apprentissage proche de celui de l'homme. Ce présent travail décrit quelques concepts d'apprentissage fondamentaux implémentés dans un agent cognitif autonome, nommé CTS (Conscious Tutoring System) développé dans le GDAC (Dubois, D., 2007). Nous proposons un modèle qui étend un apprentissage conscient et inconscient afin d'accroître l'autonomie de l'agent dans un environnement changeant ainsi que d'améliorer sa finesse. ______________________________________________________________________________ MOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : Apprentissage, Conscience, Agent cognitif, Codelet