Discurso pronunciado por el Presidente de la República, Excmo. Sr. D. Manuel Azaña, en el Paraninfo de la Universidad de Valencia, el día 18 de julio de 1937

Copia digital. Valladolid : Junta de Castilla y León. Consejería de Cultura y Turismo, 2009-201

Agrarian Women: Wives and Mothers in Rural Nebraska, 1880-1940

Review of: Agrarian Women: Wives and Mothers in Rural Nebraska, 1880-1940. Fink, Deborah

Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880-1940

Review of: Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880-1940. Dowbiggin, Ian Robert

Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880-1940

Review of: Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880-1940. Dowbiggin, Ian Robert

Iain Boyd White and David Frisby, eds. Metropolis Berlin: 1880-1940. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012.

Review of Iain Boyd White and David Frisby, eds. Metropolis Berlin: 1880-1940. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012

Review of \u3cem\u3eA Kingdom on Earth: Anglo-American Social Christianity 1880-1940.\u3c/em\u3e Paul T. Phillips. Reviewed by James Leiby, University of California, Berkeley.

Paul T. Phillips, A Kingdom on Earth: Anglo-American Social Christianity, 1880-1940.. University Park: Penn State Press, 1996. $55.00 hardcover,$16.95 papercover

Making Capitalism Safe: Work Safety and Health Regulation in America, 1880–1940

Review of: Making Capitalism Safe: Work Safety and Health Regulation in America, 1880–1940, by Donald W. Rogers, a part of the Working Class in American History Series

Building Physics and its Performance in Modern Movement Architecture

The science of Building Physics was developed in Germany from 1880–1940 but its performance in Modern Movement architecture is considered immature and in aspects problematic. Still, some international pioneers found theoretical and practical ways to catch the theme

Неопределенные суждения: трактовки Аристотеля, Боэция и Н. А. Васильева

The paper presents the problem of indeterminate statements in the work of three thinkers: the creator of syllogistic Aristotle (384–322), its translator into Latin and interpreter Severin Boethius (480–525), and the creator of an imaginary (no-aristotle) logic of N. A. Vasiliev (1880–1940). The difference of Aristotle’s and N. A. Vasiliev logic based on different interpretations of indeterminate statements. The paper shows that the accidental opinion of N. A. Vasiliev similar to indeterminate statement of modal syllogistic of Aristotle, namely, the statement of the potentially inherent.В  статье  представлено  решение проблемы  неопределенных  суждений  в трудах  трех  мыслителей:  создателя  силлогистики Аристотеля(384–322), его переводчика на латынь  и  интерпретатора  Северина  Боэция (480 – 525) и создателя воображаемой(неаристотелевой) логики  Н. А. Васильева(1880 – 1940). Различие логик Аристотеля и Н. А. Васильева основано на различных трактовках неопределенных  суждений.  В статье  показано,  что акцидентальное  суждение  Н. А. Васильева аналогично  неопределенному  суждению  модальной силлогистики Аристотеля, а именно суждению о возможно присущем