Making maps in Powerpoint and Word : why do regional scientists not map their results?

Cartography has commonly been used in regional science and Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis is regularly applied to visualise the distribution of the variable of interest in space. Articles often contain several maps of administrative areas showing the values of a certain variable. However, and despite the benefits of such maps, they are nothing more than spatial catalogues of data. Their usefulness for regional scientist is beyond questioning, but the communicative value is limited. The rise of GIS has rightly been welcomed by many scientists, however, critical cartographers often pose the question if ‘GIS has killed cartography?’. Moreover, this discussion about maps in regional science can be more than a trivial item since it can reveal the fear of scientists to draw a conclusion. The chorematics approach, as developed by Brunet, considers maps as ‘vitrines’, and not as catalogues. In this paper we show that such an approach can enrich regional science by delivering a methodology to visualise spatial structures and dynamics using geometric figures. Finally, we argue that powerpoint and word are better cartographic tools than common GIS packages

What do we think are the most important journals in regional science?

This paper reports the results of a survey about important journals in regional science. A web-based survey among regional scientists produces results about their opinion about the quality and reputation of regional science journals. The results are analyzed for stability over various characteristics of respondents like age, affiliation, nationality, main area of specialication, etc. The results are also compared to those derived from an analysis of publication records, citations and impact factors.

Regional Science Reconsidered

Because disciplines and their cores and boundaries are subject to change, a periodic introspective assessment can be useful in evaluating the relevance of a changing discipline to the equally dynamic and pressing needs of society. Similar examinations of other disciplines, notably economics, have been conducted in part as a means of minimizing the risks of declining credibility, policy relevance, and societal benefit. With the Southern Regional Science Association celebrating recently its 50th meeting, and as regional science itself approaches its 60th year, this paper provides a reexamination of the core of regional science. We consider the theoretical and methodological underpinnings and current status, the various roles played by space in various representations, and the values that guide our policy advice and recommendations. While cores and boundaries of regional science cannot be unambiguously identified, particularly due to the considerable overlap with and lineage to other disciplines, we conclude that it is precisely the interdisciplinarity of regional science that distinguishes it from other social sciences, and ensures its continued relevance

The Official Student Newspaper of UAS

UAS Answers -- UAS in Brief -- Southeast Alaska Regional Science Fair seeks judges -- Appointments, publications & workshops -- Sweet meets sour at Woosh K.’s slam -- UAS plunges into winter! -- A shortcut to mushrooms: Trips to the Kingdom fungi -- Stretching the budget: Hot dog burritos -- First Friday at the REC Spring 2013 -- Campus Calenda

Regional science at the turn of the century: Reflections on its epistemological status

As a contribution to the current debate on the state-of-the art of regional science, this paper presents some reflections on the epistemological and methodological status of the discipline as we approach the turn of the century. First of all, and contrary to the widely held view that quantitative approach is seriously 'in crisis', it is argued that the discipline is going through a period of intensive, but constructive, theoretical development. To support this assertion, the authors suggest that it is important to abandon a hidden source of prejudice: the tendency to evaluate the present situation in terms of an outdated conception of the discipline. Modern quantitative geography and regional science is a vast and varied scientific field, which has radically evolved under the pressure of changing theoretical paradigms and technological advance. It has little to do with the old regional science of the 60s. The first part of the paper reviews this evolution: 1. from the original goal of applying to geography the tools of classical science, such as statistics, optimization and modelling (whose use was made possible in the 60s by the availability of the new "number crunching" computers) 2. to the present informatization (and hence quantification) of all branches of regional science, based on PCs and the Net, used as tools not just for computation, but for data handling, representation, visualization and communication). An attempt is made to fit all of these efforts, those with a long tradition (modelling, O.R., gaming simulation, statistics etc.), as well as the more recent approaches (expert systems, G.I.S., hypermedia, virtual reality, A.I.) into a single framework, stressing the specific aims of each and identifying existing - or potential - interconnections. In the second part of the paper we focus on the new frontiers of regional science and quantitative geography with particular reference to the processes of analysis and planning. It is suggested that: 1. the goal of analysis is shifting from simulation (the explicitation in terms of the "scientific method") of the mental processes involved in problem-solving, to the replication of the human ability to "formulate problems". This implies that creativity, and related aspects such as learning, and expertise, will come increasingly within the scope of research in regional science 2. progress in planning will be limited unless we will be able to go beyond the misleading counterposition between the formalised "rational" approach and the intuitive design approach. A fruitful way to cope with planning in a complex world is to integrate the two strategies and, in doing so, to tap into wider sources of knowledge. In other words, it is important to learn the 'art' of using the tools of geographical science.