Report of the DELAMAN Costing Case Study

DELAMAN member archives estimated the costs of archiving two sample deposits of language documentation data. Comparing these costs to the cost of funding a documentation project which would generate this amount of data, the costs of archiving can be estimated to 8% of the total direct costs of the funded project. DELAMAN proposes that grantees and grantors use this 8% figure as a more simplified way to calculate archiving costs which better reflect the nature of archiving as basic infrastructure for endangered language research.http://delaman.or

DigitalCommons@ILR Collection Development Policy

DigitalCommons@ILR offers electronic access to unique material that encompasses every aspect of the workplace. The Martin P. Catherwood Library provides this service as part of its ongoing mission to serve as a comprehensive information center in support of the research, instruction, and service commitments of the School of Industrial and Labor Relations and the Cornell community

PERAN LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR DIGITAL DALAM MENINGKATKAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA

Revolusi 4.0 dan pandemic covid-19 telah mengakibatkan transformasi besar di berbagai bidang, khususnya bidang pendidikan. Lingkungan belajar tradisional berubah menjadi lingkungan belajar digital. Sementara itu program literasi juga mendapat perhatian serius dari pemerintah, diantaranya literasi matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif untuk mengetahui gambaran peran dan kaitan dantara lingkungan belajar digital dengan literasi matematika. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui pemberian tes kemampuan literasi matematika dengan jumlah soal 3 butir. Subjek penelitian merupakan 50 orang siswa kelas X SMK Negeri di Kota Palembang. Data dianalisis dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran lingkungan belajar digital dalam meningkatkan literasi matematika termasuk dalam kategori BAIK dengan persentase 80,02%

Digital literatures; digital democracies; digital threats?

Technology is reconfiguring the ways in which we consume, produce and disseminate literature, both within literary studies and outside of the academy. However, most importantly, the apparent breakdown of the gatekeeper function that has been triggered by technology in the distribution of both fiction and criticism leads to a form that looks, at least to some perhaps neo-liberal degree, as though it might be more democratic. In this paper, I explore the ways in which these new technologies unearth value structures within our discipline that have been present for a long time, despite the corrective efforts of cultural studies, but are now more overtly surfacing in a swing back toward Leavisite modes. How are we to strike a balance and sensitivity in our practice of reading and teaching towards a liberal model of value and a top-down authoritarian approach? How might technology enable or hinder such a balancing act