544 research outputs found
Systemization of Pluggable Transports for Censorship Resistance
An increasing number of countries implement Internet censorship at different
scales and for a variety of reasons. In particular, the link between the
censored client and entry point to the uncensored network is a frequent target
of censorship due to the ease with which a nation-state censor can control it.
A number of censorship resistance systems have been developed thus far to help
circumvent blocking on this link, which we refer to as link circumvention
systems (LCs). The variety and profusion of attack vectors available to a
censor has led to an arms race, leading to a dramatic speed of evolution of
LCs. Despite their inherent complexity and the breadth of work in this area,
there is no systematic way to evaluate link circumvention systems and compare
them against each other. In this paper, we (i) sketch an attack model to
comprehensively explore a censor's capabilities, (ii) present an abstract model
of a LC, a system that helps a censored client communicate with a server over
the Internet while resisting censorship, (iii) describe an evaluation stack
that underscores a layered approach to evaluate LCs, and (iv) systemize and
evaluate existing censorship resistance systems that provide link
circumvention. We highlight open challenges in the evaluation and development
of LCs and discuss possible mitigations.Comment: Content from this paper was published in Proceedings on Privacy
Enhancing Technologies (PoPETS), Volume 2016, Issue 4 (July 2016) as "SoK:
Making Sense of Censorship Resistance Systems" by Sheharbano Khattak, Tariq
Elahi, Laurent Simon, Colleen M. Swanson, Steven J. Murdoch and Ian Goldberg
(DOI 10.1515/popets-2016-0028
SoK: Making Sense of Censorship Resistance Systems
An increasing number of countries implement Internet censorship at different scales and for a variety of reasons. Several censorship resistance systems (CRSs) have emerged to help bypass such blocks. The diversity of the censor’s attack landscape has led to an arms race, leading to a dramatic speed of evolution of CRSs. The inherent complexity of CRSs and the breadth of work in this area makes it hard to contextualize the censor’s capabilities and censorship resistance strategies. To address these challenges, we conducted a comprehensive survey of CRSs-deployed tools as well as those discussed in academic literature-to systematize censorship resistance systems by their threat model and corresponding defenses. To this end, we first sketch a comprehensive attack model to set out the censor’s capabilities, coupled with discussion on the scope of censorship, and the dynamics that influence the censor’s decision. Next, we present an evaluation framework to systematize censorship resistance systems by their security, privacy, performance and deployability properties, and show how these systems map to the attack model. We do this for each of the functional phases that we identify for censorship resistance systems: communication establishment, which involves distribution and retrieval of information necessary for a client to join the censorship resistance system; and conversation, where actual exchange of information takes place. Our evaluation leads us to identify gaps in the literature, question the assumptions at play, and explore possible mitigations
Censorship Resistance as a Side-Effect
This position paper presents the following thought experiment: can we build communication protocols that (1) are sufficiently useful that they achieve widespread adoption as general-purpose communication mechanisms and (2) thwart censorship as a consequence of their design? We posit that a useful communication platform that is inherently resistant to traffic analysis, if widely adopted and used primarily for purposes not related to censorship circumvention, may be too politically and economically costly for a government to block.
An Empirical Study of the I2P Anonymity Network and its Censorship Resistance
Tor and I2P are well-known anonymity networks used by many individuals to
protect their online privacy and anonymity. Tor's centralized directory
services facilitate the understanding of the Tor network, as well as the
measurement and visualization of its structure through the Tor Metrics project.
In contrast, I2P does not rely on centralized directory servers, and thus
obtaining a complete view of the network is challenging. In this work, we
conduct an empirical study of the I2P network, in which we measure properties
including population, churn rate, router type, and the geographic distribution
of I2P peers. We find that there are currently around 32K active I2P peers in
the network on a daily basis. Of these peers, 14K are located behind NAT or
firewalls.
Using the collected network data, we examine the blocking resistance of I2P
against a censor that wants to prevent access to I2P using address-based
blocking techniques. Despite the decentralized characteristics of I2P, we
discover that a censor can block more than 95% of peer IP addresses known by a
stable I2P client by operating only 10 routers in the network. This amounts to
severe network impairment: a blocking rate of more than 70% is enough to cause
significant latency in web browsing activities, while blocking more than 90% of
peer IP addresses can make the network unusable. Finally, we discuss the
security consequences of the network being blocked, and directions for
potential approaches to make I2P more resistant to blocking.Comment: 14 pages, To appear in the 2018 Internet Measurement Conference
(IMC'18
Oblivion: Mitigating Privacy Leaks by Controlling the Discoverability of Online Information
Search engines are the prevalently used tools to collect information about
individuals on the Internet. Search results typically comprise a variety of
sources that contain personal information -- either intentionally released by
the person herself, or unintentionally leaked or published by third parties,
often with detrimental effects on the individual's privacy. To grant
individuals the ability to regain control over their disseminated personal
information, the European Court of Justice recently ruled that EU citizens have
a right to be forgotten in the sense that indexing systems, must offer them
technical means to request removal of links from search results that point to
sources violating their data protection rights. As of now, these technical
means consist of a web form that requires a user to manually identify all
relevant links upfront and to insert them into the web form, followed by a
manual evaluation by employees of the indexing system to assess if the request
is eligible and lawful.
We propose a universal framework Oblivion to support the automation of the
right to be forgotten in a scalable, provable and privacy-preserving manner.
First, Oblivion enables a user to automatically find and tag her disseminated
personal information using natural language processing and image recognition
techniques and file a request in a privacy-preserving manner. Second, Oblivion
provides indexing systems with an automated and provable eligibility mechanism,
asserting that the author of a request is indeed affected by an online
resource. The automated ligibility proof ensures censorship-resistance so that
only legitimately affected individuals can request the removal of corresponding
links from search results. We have conducted comprehensive evaluations, showing
that Oblivion is capable of handling 278 removal requests per second, and is
hence suitable for large-scale deployment
SoK: Making Sense of Censorship Resistance Systems
An increasing number of countries implement Internet censorship at different scales and for a variety of reasons. Several censorship resistance systems (CRSs) have emerged to help bypass such blocks. The diversity of the censor’s attack landscape has led to an arms race, leading to a dramatic speed of evolution of CRSs. The inherent complexity of CRSs and the breadth of work in this area makes it hard to contextualize the censor’s capabilities and censorship resistance strategies. To address these challenges, we conducted a comprehensive survey of CRSs-deployed tools as well as those discussed in academic literature-to systematize censorship resistance systems by their threat model and corresponding defenses. To this end, we first sketch a comprehensive attack model to set out the censor’s capabilities, coupled with discussion on the scope of censorship, and the dynamics that influence the censor’s decision. Next, we present an evaluation framework to systematize censorship resistance systems by their security, privacy, performance and deployability properties, and show how these systems map to the attack model. We do this for each of the functional phases that we identify for censorship resistance systems: communication establishment, which involves distribution and retrieval of information necessary for a client to join the censorship resistance system; and conversation, where actual exchange of information takes place. Our evaluation leads us to identify gaps in the literature, question the assumptions at play, and explore possible mitigations
A Blockchain-based Approach for Data Accountability and Provenance Tracking
The recent approval of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) imposes
new data protection requirements on data controllers and processors with
respect to the processing of European Union (EU) residents' data. These
requirements consist of a single set of rules that have binding legal status
and should be enforced in all EU member states. In light of these requirements,
we propose in this paper the use of a blockchain-based approach to support data
accountability and provenance tracking. Our approach relies on the use of
publicly auditable contracts deployed in a blockchain that increase the
transparency with respect to the access and usage of data. We identify and
discuss three different models for our approach with different granularity and
scalability requirements where contracts can be used to encode data usage
policies and provenance tracking information in a privacy-friendly way. From
these three models we designed, implemented, and evaluated a model where
contracts are deployed by data subjects for each data controller, and a model
where subjects join contracts deployed by data controllers in case they accept
the data handling conditions. Our implementations show in practice the
feasibility and limitations of contracts for the purposes identified in this
paper
- …