MODELING THE ROLE BEHAVIOR OF STUDENTS OF THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING TO COMMUNICATE IN ENGLISH

The article is connected with the problem of ESP teaching-learning process. Main attention is focused on professional roles of modern engineers during their communications in English, as well as appropriate components of their simulation in academic studies

Comparison of histological delineations of medial temporal lobe cortices by four independent neuroanatomy laboratories

The medial temporal lobe (MTL) cortex, located adjacent to the hippocampus, is crucial for memory and prone to the accumulation of certain neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tau tangles. The MTL cortex is composed of several subregions which differ in their functional and cytoarchitectonic features. As neuroanatomical schools rely on different cytoarchitectonic definitions of these subregions, it is unclear to what extent their delineations of MTL cortex subregions overlap. Here, we provide an overview of cytoarchitectonic definitions of the entorhinal and parahippocampal cortices as well as Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, as provided by four neuroanatomists from different laboratories, aiming to identify the rationale for overlapping and diverging delineations. Nissl-stained series were acquired from the temporal lobes of three human specimens (two right and one left hemisphere). Slices (50 μm thick) were prepared perpendicular to the long axis of the hippocampus spanning the entire longitudinal extent of the MTL cortex. Four neuroanatomists annotated MTL cortex subregions on digitized slices spaced 5 mm apart (pixel size 0.4 μm at 20× magnification). Parcellations, terminology, and border placement were compared among neuroanatomists. Cytoarchitectonic features of each subregion are described in detail. Qualitative analysis of the annotations showed higher agreement in the definitions of the entorhinal cortex and BA35, while the definitions of BA36 and the parahippocampal cortex exhibited less overlap among neuroanatomists. The degree of overlap of cytoarchitectonic definitions was partially reflected in the neuroanatomists' agreement on the respective delineations. Lower agreement in annotations was observed in transitional zones between structures where seminal cytoarchitectonic features are expressed less saliently. The results highlight that definitions and parcellations of the MTL cortex differ among neuroanatomical schools and thereby increase understanding of why these differences may arise. This work sets a crucial foundation to further advance anatomically-informed neuroimaging research on the human MTL cortex

Forest Carbon Resources of Belarus

The monograph outlines the views of Belarusian experts on the contribution of the forest sector of Belarus to mitigation of weather and climate impacts on the environment which is made through carbon dioxide absorption by foreste and partial sequestration of carbon in the forest and components. It touches upon the calculation of carbon dioxide emmissions and absorption, the carbon budget of the Belarusian forest fund, relationship between the age and species structure and the carbon dioxide absorption by forests, measures on increasung of carbon dioxide absorption by forests, etc

Hippocampal Subfields Group progress update: Consensus protocol to segment subfields within the hippocampal body on high-resolution in vivo MRI

Hippocampal subfields are differentially sensitive in development, aging, and neurodegenerative disease. High-resolution imaging techniques have accelerated clinical research of hippocampal subfields; however, substantial differences in protocols impede comparisons in the literature across laboratories. The Hippocampal Subfields Group (HSG) is an international organization seeking to address this issue by developing a histologically-valid, reliable, and freely available segmentation protocol for high-resolution T2-weighted 3T MRI (http://www.hippocampalsubfields.com). This progress update presents the consensus draft protocol for segmenting subfields within the hippocampal body. The segmentation protocol is based on a novel histological reference data set labeled by multiple expert neuroanatomists. Two naïve raters demonstrated feasibility on an MRI dataset including brains from children and adults, and all subfield volume measurements had good reliability. Twenty-six labs with reported 4 years or more experience segmenting hippocampal subfields in healthy lifespan and patient populations participated in an online survey, which included detailed protocol information, feasibility testing, demonstration videos, example segmentations, and labeled histology. Due to the complexity of the internal anatomy, two approaches for segmenting the boundary between cornu ammonis (CA) 3 and dentate gyrus subfields were presented, and the majority approved a geometric heuristic-based protocol over one that referenced the endfolial pathway anatomy: 58% geometric, 23% endfolial, and with 19% expressing no opinion. Labs rated each internal boundary definition for clarity and agreement with the protocol on a scale 1 (low) to 9 (high). All definitions were rated with high clarity (M = 8.42 – 8.65) and reached consensus agreement (binomial ps < 0.01). The geometric heuristic protocol includes labels for the internal boundaries between subiculum, each CA field, and dentate gyrus, which when combined with the external boundaries that previously reached consensus, labels subfield volumes throughout the hippocampal body. We are now conducting a formal reliability test of the hippocampal body protocol with a group of expert and novice raters who are naïve to the protocol. With confirmation of reliability, we will disseminate the validated harmonized segmentation protocol and resources for automated segmentation. The harmonized protocol will significantly facilitate cross-study comparisons and provide increased insight into the structure and function of hippocampal subfields across the lifespan and in disease

The development of a valid, reliable, harmonized segmentation protocol for hippocampal subfields and medial temporal lobe cortices: A progress update

BackgroundThe medial temporal lobe (MTL, i.e. hippocampus and adjacent cortices) is particularly vulnerable to age‐related diseases: Alzheimer’s disease, other age‐related proteinothies (TDP‐43, AGD, etc) and vascular injury. Yet, the subregional pattern of vulnerability is thought to differ across etiologies; characterizing these differences using high‐resolution MRI may provide more insight in disease processes and better biomarkers. However, substantial differences in subfield definition has hindered the ability to compare results across laboratories or draw robust conclusions (Figure 1). The Hippocampal Subfields Group (HSG) is an international group seeking to remedy this problem by developing a histologically‐valid, reliable, and freely available segmentation protocol for high‐resolution T2‐weighted 3T MRI (http://www.hippocampalsubfields.com)MethodOur workflow consists of five steps: 1) collecting histology samples labeled by multiple expert neuroanatomists to form a novel reference dataset to guide the development of the MRI segmentation protocol, 2) developing boundary definitions for each segment of the hippocampus, (head, body, and tail) and MTL cortices), 3) assessing HSG community agreement with boundary rules via online questionnaires and revising boundary rules based on questionnaire responses, and 4) testing reliability of the protocol definitions on multiple MRI datasets.ResultFor both the hippocampal body and head, we have developed a preliminary subfield segmentation protocol (i.e. completed steps 1‐2, see Figure 2 for a histology slice segmented by three anatomists). Step 3 was piloted for the outer boundaries of the body (i.e., the anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, and superior/inferior boundaries) using an online questionnaire describing each of the proposed rules. 29 labs participated and consensus agreement was reached for all rules, with only minor changes being made to improve comprehension and clarity. We are now creating and administering additional questionnaires for assessing agreement of the hippocampal body and head inner boundary rules (e.g., between the CA fields and dentate gyrus). Upon completion of the assessment/revision process for each set of rules, the final phase – reliability testing of the protocol – should begin mid 2020 for the body.ConclusionOnce completed, the harmonized protocol will significantly facilitate cross‐study comparisons thus advancing insight in the role of hippocampal subfields across the lifespan in aging and disease

Comparison of histological delineations of medial temporal lobe cortices by four independent neuroanatomy laboratories

The medial temporal lobe (MTL) cortex, located adjacent to the hippocampus, is crucial for memory and prone to the accumulation of certain neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tau tangles. The MTL cortex is composed of several subregions which differ in their functional and cytoarchitectonic features. As neuroanatomical schools rely on different cytoarchitectonic definitions of these subregions, it is unclear to what extent their delineations of MTL cortex subregions overlap. Here, we provide an overview of cytoarchitectonic definitions of the cortices that make up the parahippocampal gyrus (entorhinal and parahippocampal cortices) and the adjacent Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, as provided by four neuroanatomists from different laboratories, aiming to identify the rationale for overlapping and diverging delineations. Nissl-stained series were acquired from the temporal lobes of three human specimens (two right and one left hemisphere). Slices (50 µm thick) were prepared perpendicular to the long axis of the hippocampus spanning the entire longitudinal extent of the MTL cortex. Four neuroanatomists annotated MTL cortex subregions on digitized (20X resolution) slices with 5 mm spacing. Parcellations, terminology, and border placement were compared among neuroanatomists. Cytoarchitectonic features of each subregion are described in detail. Qualitative analysis of the annotations showed higher agreement in the definitions of the entorhinal cortex and BA35, while definitions of BA36 and the parahippocampal cortex exhibited less overlap among neuroanatomists. The degree of overlap of cytoarchitectonic definitions was partially reflected in the neuroanatomists' agreement on the respective delineations. Lower agreement in annotations was observed in transitional zones between structures where seminal cytoarchitectonic features are expressed more gradually. The results highlight that definitions and parcellations of the MTL cortex differ among neuroanatomical schools and thereby increase understanding of why these differences may arise. This work sets a crucial foundation to further advance anatomically-informed human neuroimaging research on the MTL cortex

A harmonized segmentation protocol for hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions: Why do we need one and what are the key goals?

The advent of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled in vivo research in a variety of populations and diseases on the structure and function of hippocampal subfields and subdivisions of the parahippocampal gyrus. Due to the many extant and highly discrepant segmentation protocols, comparing results across studies is difficult. To overcome this barrier, the Hippocampal Subfields Group was formed as an international collaboration with the aim of developing a harmonized protocol for manual segmentation of hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions on high-resolution MRI. In this commentary we discuss the goals for this protocol and the associated key challenges involved in its development. These include differences among existing anatomical reference materials, striking the right balance between reliability of measurements and anatomical validity, and the development of a versatile protocol that can be adopted for the study of populations varying in age and health. The commentary outlines these key challenges, as well as the proposed solution of each, with concrete examples from our working plan. Finally, with two examples, we illustrate how the harmonized protocol, once completed, is expected to impact the field by producing measurements that are quantitatively comparable across labs and by facilitating the synthesis of findings across different studies

Progress Update from the Hippocampal Subfields Group

IntroductionHeterogeneity of segmentation protocols for medial temporal lobe regions and hippocampal subfields on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging hinders the ability to integrate findings across studies. We aim to develop a harmonized protocol based on expert consensus and histological evidence.MethodsOur international working group, funded by the EU Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND), is working toward the production of a reliable, validated, harmonized protocol for segmentation of medial temporal lobe regions. The working group uses a novel postmortem data set and online consensus procedures to ensure validity and facilitate adoption.ResultsThis progress report describes the initial results and milestones that we have achieved to date, including the development of a draft protocol and results from the initial reliability tests and consensus procedures.DiscussionA harmonized protocol will enable the standardization of segmentation methods across laboratories interested in medial temporal lobe research worldwide