Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: a narrative review of the global research gaps, challenges, and opportunities

Background Sexually transmitted infections (STI), such as chlamydial, gonorrheal, and trichomonal infection, are prevalent in pregnant women in many countries and are widely reported to be associated with increased risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Syndromic STI management is frequently used in pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries, yet its low specificity and sensitivity lead to both over- and undertreatment. Etiologic screening for chlamydial, gonorrheal, and/or trichomonal infection in all pregnant women combined with targeted treatment might be an effective intervention. However, the evidence base is insufficient to support development of global recommendations. We aimed to describe key considerations and knowledge gaps regarding chlamydial, gonorrheal, and trichomonal screening during pregnancy to inform future research needed for developing guidelines for low- and middle-income countries. Methods We conducted a narrative review based on PubMed and clinical trials registry searches through January 20, 2020, guidelines review, and expert opinion. We summarized our findings using the frameworks adopted by the World Health Organization for guideline development. Results Adverse maternal-child health outcomes of potential interest are wide-ranging and variably defined. No completed randomized controlled trials on etiologic screening and targeted treatment were identified. Evidence from observational studies was limited and trials of presumptive STI treatment have shown mixed results. Subgroups that might benefit from specific recommendations were identified. Evidence on harms was limited. Cost-effectiveness was influenced by STI prevalence and availability of testing infrastructure and high-accuracy/low-cost tests. Preliminary data suggested high patient acceptability. Discussion Preliminary data on harms, acceptability, and feasibility and the availability of emerging test technologies suggest that etiologic STI screening deserves further evaluation as a potential tool to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes worldwide

Combined evaluation of sexually transmitted infections in HIV-infected pregnant women and infant HIV transmission

Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Treponema pallidum (TP), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) may lead to adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes. The role of combined maternal STIs in HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) was evaluated in mother-infant pairs from NICHD HPTN 040. Methodology Urine samples from HIV-infected pregnant women during labor were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for CT, NG, and CMV. Infant HIV infection was determined by serial HIV DNA PCR testing. Maternal syphilis was tested by VDRL and confirmatory treponemal antibodies. Results A total of 899 mother-infant pairs were evaluated. Over 30% had at least one of the following infections (TP, CT, NG, and/or CMV) detected at the time of delivery. High rates of TP (8.7%), CT (17.8%), NG (4%), and CMV (6.3%) were observed. HIV MTCT was 9.1% (n = 82 infants). HIV MTCT was 12.5%, 10.3%, 11.1%, and 26.3% among infants born to women with CT, TP, NG or CMV respectively. Forty-two percent of HIV-infected infants were born to women with at least one of these 4 infections. Women with these infections were nearly twice as likely to have an HIV-infected infant (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), particularly those with 2 STIs (aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.7). Individually, maternal CMV (aOR 4.4 1.5-13.0) and infant congenital CMV (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.2-7.8) but not other STIs (TP, CT, or NG) were associated with an increased risk of HIV MTCT. Conclusion HIV-infected pregnant women identified during labor are at high risk for STIs. Co-infection with STIs including CMV nearly doubles HIV MTCT risk. CMV infection appears to confer the largest risk of HIV MTCT.NICHD (NICHD)(Brazilian AIDS Prevention Trials International Network), NIAID/ NIHNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. (BIPI)GlaxoSmithKline, on behalf of ViiV HealthcareCepheid for the testing of CTNG in a prior HPTNUCLA Children's Discovery and Innovation Institute (CDI) through the Harry Winston Fellowship AwardUCLA AIDS InstituteUCLA Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) NIH/ NIAIDUCLA Pediatric AIDS Coalition, and WestatNIH/NICHDDavid Geffen UCLA Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAWestat Corp, Rockville, MD USAFundacao Oswaldo Cruz FIOCRUZ, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUS Dept State, Off Global AIDS Coordinator, Washington, DC 20520 USAElizabeth Glaser Pediat AIDS Fdn, Washington, DC USAHosp Geral Nova Iguacu, Nova Iguacu, RJ, BrazilHosp Fed Servidores Estado, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniv Witwatersrand, SAMRC & Perinatal HIV Res Unit, Johannesburg, South AfricaStellenbosch Univ, Tygerberg Hosp, Cape Town, South AfricaHosp Conceicao, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilHosp Femina, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilIrmandade Santa Casa Misericordia Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilFdn Maternal & Infant Hlth FUNDASAMIN, Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilEunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, NIH, Bethesda, MD USAUCLA, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA USAUCSD Sch Med, La Jolla, CA USAUC Davis Sch Med, Davis, CA USABoston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USAUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilNICHD (NICHD): HHSN267200800001C, N01-HD-8-0001Brazilian AIDS Prevention Trials International Network: NIAID/ NIH [U01 AI047986National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): U01 AI068632, UM1AI068632, UM1AI068616, UM1AI106716NIMH: AI068632NG in a prior HPTN :040UCLA Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) NIH/ NIAID: AI02869, AI28697NIH/NICHD: HHSN275201300003CWeb of Scienc

High Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Pregnant Women Living in Southern Brazil

BackgroundPorto Alegre, Brazil, has the highest rates of congenital syphilis and HIV in the country. Other treatable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are associated with poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, but are only diagnosed by syndromic algorithms.MethodsBetween September 2018 and November 2019, we offered all pregnant women clinic-based STI testing for HIV antibody and treponemal antibody (via lateral flow assay rapid tests provided by the Brazilian Government) and for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis (via polymerase chain reaction-based testing provided by Gene Xpert, Sunnyvale, CA) in 10 public prenatal health clinics in Porto Alegre. Participating women answered a brief survey via audio computer-assisted survey instrument regarding demographics, partnerships, and sexual behaviors. All infected individuals received appropriate treatment and referrals.ResultsOf 400 pregnant women recruited, 94 (24%) were diagnosed with an STI, including 2% with HIV, 11% with syphilis, 9% with chlamydia, 1% with gonorrhea, 5% with trichomoniasis, and 3% with more than 1 STI. In our multivariate analysis, younger age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-1.2), being non-White (AOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), having less education (AOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4), and having a relationship <1 year (AOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6) were all independent predictors of women having an STI. Endorsing symptoms of an STI (e.g., vaginal ulcers/lesions and vaginal discharge) was not predictive of having a laboratory-diagnosed STI (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7).ConclusionsEtiologic-based screening for STIs was uniformly accepted by women attending both hospital-based and primary health clinics in the south of Brazil and can result in appropriate treatment of pregnant women

High Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Pregnant Women Living in Southern Brazil

BackgroundPorto Alegre, Brazil, has the highest rates of congenital syphilis and HIV in the country. Other treatable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are associated with poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, but are only diagnosed by syndromic algorithms.MethodsBetween September 2018 and November 2019, we offered all pregnant women clinic-based STI testing for HIV antibody and treponemal antibody (via lateral flow assay rapid tests provided by the Brazilian Government) and for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis (via polymerase chain reaction-based testing provided by Gene Xpert, Sunnyvale, CA) in 10 public prenatal health clinics in Porto Alegre. Participating women answered a brief survey via audio computer-assisted survey instrument regarding demographics, partnerships, and sexual behaviors. All infected individuals received appropriate treatment and referrals.ResultsOf 400 pregnant women recruited, 94 (24%) were diagnosed with an STI, including 2% with HIV, 11% with syphilis, 9% with chlamydia, 1% with gonorrhea, 5% with trichomoniasis, and 3% with more than 1 STI. In our multivariate analysis, younger age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-1.2), being non-White (AOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), having less education (AOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4), and having a relationship <1 year (AOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6) were all independent predictors of women having an STI. Endorsing symptoms of an STI (e.g., vaginal ulcers/lesions and vaginal discharge) was not predictive of having a laboratory-diagnosed STI (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7).ConclusionsEtiologic-based screening for STIs was uniformly accepted by women attending both hospital-based and primary health clinics in the south of Brazil and can result in appropriate treatment of pregnant women

Diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections in male partners of pregnant women in Brazil

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) can adversely affect a woman's pregnancy and the health of the developing fetus. The source of these infections may be the male sexual partner who remains under-diagnosed and un-treated due to a combination of lack of symptoms, decreased access to health care, and poor health-seeking behaviors. From September 2018 to November 2019, we offered a cohort of pregnant women (gestational age range: 4.6-41 weeks) clinic-based STI testing for HIV and syphilis (via lateral flow assay rapid tests) and for Neisseria (N.) gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis, and Trichomonas (T.) vaginalis (via PCR-based testing) at Santa Casa Hospital and 10 affiliated prenatal clinics in Porto Alegre, Brazil. 400 women between the ages of 18 and 46 years (mean age: 27 years) enrolled and 24% were diagnosed with an STI. Each woman enrolled agreed to invite their male partners to clinic for the same panel of STI testing, and 255 men (64%) between the ages of 18 and 64 years (mean age: 29 years) attended clinic and all accepted full intervention. In these male partners, 40 (16%) were diagnosed with an STI including 22 (8.7%) testing positive for C. trachomatis, 15 (6%) for treponemal antibody (syphilis), 7 (2.8%) for T. vaginalis, 3 (1.2%) for N. gonorrhoeae, and 1 (0.4%) for HIV antibody. In our multivariate analysis, having symptoms of an STI (AOR 4.5, 95% CI 1.3-15.2) and arguing about jealousy (AOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.2) remained significantly associated with male diagnosis of an STI. Sexually transmitted infections are common in sexual partners of pregnant women in Brazil and should be addressed to prevent reinfection of pregnant women

Enteric Fever in a 6-Year-Old Traveler Caused by Salmonella enterica Serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A: Laboratory Detection Strategies and Treatment Options ▿

We report the first pediatric case of enteric fever caused by Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A. Mixed infections are infrequently reported, potentially because detection of two different Salmonella serotypes in blood cultures is technically challenging. We suggest laboratory strategies to aid in the recognition of mixed infections