12 research outputs found
An Empirical Comparison of Consumer Innovation Adoption Models: Implications for Subsistence Marketplaces
So called “pro-poor” innovations may improve consumer wellbeing in subsistence marketplaces. However, there is little research that integrates the area with the vast literature on innovation adoption. Using a questionnaire where respondents were asked to provide their evaluations about a mobile banking innovation, this research fills this gap by providing empirical evidence of the applicability of existing innovation adoption models in subsistence marketplaces. The study was conducted in Bangladesh among a geographically dispersed sample. The data collected allowed an empirical comparison of models in a subsistence context. The research reveals the most useful models in this context to be the Value Based Adoption Model and the Consumer Acceptance of Technology model. In light of these findings and further examination of the model comparison results the research also shows that consumers in subsistence marketplaces are not just motivated by functionality and economic needs. If organizations cannot enhance the hedonic attributes of a pro-poor innovation, and reduce the internal/external constraints related to adoption of that pro-poor innovation, then adoption intention by consumers will be lower
Identification of a New Class of Glucokinase Activators through Structure-Based Design
Glucose flux through glucokinase
(GK) controls insulin release
from the pancreas in response to high glucose concentrations. Glucose
flux through GK also contributes to reducing hepatic glucose output.
Because many individuals with type 2 diabetes appear to have an inadequacy
or defect in one or both of these processes, compounds that can activate
GK may serve as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes. Herein we
report the identification and initial optimization of a novel series
of allosteric glucokinase activators (GKAs). We discovered an initial
thiazolylamino pyridine-based hit that was optimized using a structure-based
design strategy and identified <b>26</b> as an early lead. Compound <b>26</b> demonstrated a good balance of in vitro potency and enzyme
kinetic parameters and demonstrated blood glucose reductions in oral
glucose tolerance tests in both C57BL/6J mice and high-fat fed Zucker
diabetic fatty rats