780 research outputs found
Virtual Compton scattering off nuclei in the -resonance region
Virtual Compton scattering in the -resonance region is considered in
the case of a target nucleus. The discussion involves generalized
polarizabilities and is developed for zero-spin nuclei, focusing on the new
information coming from virtual Compton scattering in comparison with real
Compton scattering.Comment: 8 pages, LaTeX, 3 figures available from the author
Directional deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: results of an international crossover study with randomized, double-blind primary endpoint
Objective: Published reports on directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been limited to small, single-center investigations.
Therapeutic window (TW) is used to describe the range of stimulation amplitudes achieving symptom relief without side effects.
This crossover study performed a randomized double-blind assessment of TW for directional and omnidirectional DBS in a large
cohort of patients implanted with a DBS system in the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinsonâs disease.
Materials and Methods: Participants received omnidirectional stimulation for the first three months after initial study pro gramming, followed by directional DBS for the following three months. The primary endpoint was a double-blind, randomized
evaluation of TW for directional vs omnidirectional stimulation at three months after initial study programming. Additional data
recorded at three- and six-month follow-ups included stimulation preference, therapeutic current strength, Unified Parkinsonâs
Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor score, and quality of life.
Results: The study enrolled 234 subjects (62 ± 8 years, 33% female). TW was wider using directional stimulation in 183 of 202
subjects (90.6%). The mean increase in TW with directional stimulation was 41% (2.98 ± 1.38 mA, compared to 2.11 ± 1.33 mA for
omnidirectional). UPDRS part III motor score on medication improved 42.4% at three months (after three months of omnidi rectional stimulation) and 43.3% at six months (after three months of directional stimulation) with stimulation on, compared to
stimulation off. After six months, 52.8% of subjects blinded to stimulation type (102/193) preferred the period with directional
stimulation, and 25.9% (50/193) preferred the omnidirectional period. The directional period was preferred by 58.5% of clinicians
(113/193) vs 21.2% (41/193) who preferred the omnidirectional period.
Conclusion: Directional stimulation yielded a wider TW compared to omnidirectional stimulation and was preferred by blinded
subjects and clinicians
A Search for Hierarchical Triples using Kepler Eclipse Timing
We present the first results of a Kepler survey of 41 eclipsing binaries that
we undertook to search for third star companions. Such tertiaries will
periodically alter the eclipse timings through light travel time and dynamical
effects. We discuss the prevalence of starspots and pulsation among these
binaries and how these phenomena influence the eclipse times. There is no
evidence of short period companions (P < 700 d) among this sample, but we do
find evidence for long term timing variations in 14 targets (34%). We argue
that this finding is consistent with the presence of tertiary companions among
a significant fraction of the targets, especially if many have orbits measured
in decades. This result supports the idea that the formation of close binaries
involves the deposition of angular momentum into the orbital motion of a third
star.Comment: AJ, in press, 104 pages, 2 figure sets plus 1 regular figur
Automated bolus advisor control and usability study (ABACUS): does use of an insulin bolus advisor improve glycaemic control in patients failing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy? [NCT01460446]
BACKGROUND: People with T1DM and insulin-treated T2DM often do not follow and/or adjust their insulin regimens as needed. Key contributors to treatment non-adherence are fear of hypoglycaemia, difficulty and lack of self-efficacy associated with insulin dose determination. Because manual calculation of insulin boluses is both complex and time consuming, people may rely on empirical estimates, which can result in persistent hypoglycaemia and/or hyperglycaemia. Use of automated bolus advisors (BA) has been shown to help insulin pump users to more accurately meet prandial insulin dosage requirements, improve postprandial glycaemic excursions, and achieve optimal glycaemic control with an increased time within optimal range. Use of a BA containing an early algorithm based on sliding scales for insulin dosing has also been shown to improve HbA1c levels in people treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). We designed a study to determine if use of an automated BA can improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes in people treated with MDI. METHODS/DESIGN: The Automated Bolus Advisor Control and Usability Study (ABACUS) is a 6-month, prospective, randomised, multi-centre, multi-national trial to determine if automated BA use improves glycaemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in people using MDI with elevated HbA1c levels (#62;7.5%). A total of 226 T1DM and T2DM participants will be recruited. Anticipated attrition of 20% will yield a sample size of 90 participants, which will provide #62;80% power to detect a mean difference of 0.5%, with SD of 0.9%, using a one-sided 5% t-test, with 5% significance level. Other measures of glycaemic control, self-care behaviours and psychosocial issues will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: It is critical that healthcare providers utilise available technologies that both facilitate effective glucose management and address concerns about safety and lifestyle. Automated BAs may help people using MDI to manage their diabetes more effectively and minimise the risk of long-term diabetes related complications. Findings from a recent study suggest that BA use positively addresses both safety and lifestyle concerns; however, randomised trials are needed to confirm these perceptions and determine whether bolus advisor use improves clinical outcomes. Our study is designed to make these assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT0146044
Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination
Performing joint actions often requires precise temporal coordination of individual actions. The present study investigated how people coordinate their actions at discrete points in time when continuous or rhythmic information about othersâ actions is not available. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that making oneself predictable is used as a coordination strategy. Pairs of participants were instructed to coordinate key presses in a two-choice reaction time task, either responding in synchrony (Experiments 1 and 2) or in close temporal succession (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we found that coactors reduced the variability of their actions in the joint context compared with the same task performed individually. Correlation analyses indicated that the less variable the actions were, the better was interpersonal coordination. The relation between reduced variability and improved coordination performance was not observed when pairs of participants performed independent tasks next to each other without intending to coordinate. These findings support the claim that reducing variability is used as a coordination strategy to achieve predictability. Identifying coordination strategies contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms involved in real-time coordination
Control leukemia by inducing anti-cancer immune reactivity in vivo? Potential of a dc-triggered mechanism [Poster]
Spontaneous adaptation explains why people act faster when being imitated
The human ability to perform joint actions is often attributed to high-level cognitive processes. For example, the finding that action leaders act faster when imitated by their partners has been interpreted as evidence for anticipation of the otherâs actions (Pfister, Dignath, Hommel, & Kunde, 2013). In two experiments, we showed that a low-level mechanism can account for this finding. Action leaders were faster when imitated than when counterimitated, but only if they could observe their partnerâs actions (Exp. 1). Crucially, when due to our manipulation the partnerâs imitative actions became slower than the counterimitative actions, leaders also became slower when they were imitated, and faster when counterimitated (Exp. 2). Our results suggest that spontaneous temporal adaptation is a key mechanism in joint action tasks. We argue for a reconsideration of other phenomena that have traditionally been attributed solely to high-level processes
- âŠ