6 research outputs found

    National trends in management of adult myxopapillary ependymomas

    Get PDF
    Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) are WHO Grade I ependymomas that annually occur in 0.05–0.08 per 100,000 people. Surgical resection is the recommended first line therapy. Due to the rarity of the disease, there is a relatively poor understanding of the use of radiotherapy (RT) in managing this disease. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was analyzed for patterns of care for adult MPE diagnosed between 2002 and 2016. Of 753 qualifying cases, the majority of patients underwent resection (n = 617, 81.9%). A relatively small portion received RT (n = 103, 13.3%) with most receiving RT post-operatively (n = 98, 95.1%). The likelihood of patients to undergo resection and RT was associated with patient age at diagnosis (p = 0.002), tumor size (p < 0.001), and race (p = 0.017). Chemotherapy was not widely utilized (0.27% of patients). One limitation of our analysis is that there was no data on progression free survival (PFS), an important outcome given the high survival rate in this disease. Surgery remains the primary means to manage adult MPE. For spinal MPE, it is understood that gross total resection (GTR) should be attempted whenever possible as GTR has been associated with improved PFS in several studies. The impact of RT on overall survival (OS) is indeterminate given the 1.6% death rate in the cohort. Analyses of the impact of RT on PFS in a larger database would be beneficial for determining an algorithm for post-operative and definitive RT in this disease entity

    Delayed colorectal cancer care during covid-19 pandemic (decor-19). Global perspective from an international survey

    No full text
    Background The widespread nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been unprecedented. We sought to analyze its global impact with a survey on colorectal cancer (CRC) care during the pandemic. Methods The impact of COVID-19 on preoperative assessment, elective surgery, and postoperative management of CRC patients was explored by a 35-item survey, which was distributed worldwide to members of surgical societies with an interest in CRC care. Respondents were divided into two comparator groups: 1) ‘delay’ group: CRC care affected by the pandemic; 2) ‘no delay’ group: unaltered CRC practice. Results A total of 1,051 respondents from 84 countries completed the survey. No substantial differences in demographics were found between the ‘delay’ (745, 70.9%) and ‘no delay’ (306, 29.1%) groups. Suspension of multidisciplinary team meetings, staff members quarantined or relocated to COVID-19 units, units fully dedicated to COVID-19 care, personal protective equipment not readily available were factors significantly associated to delays in endoscopy, radiology, surgery, histopathology and prolonged chemoradiation therapy-to-surgery intervals. In the ‘delay’ group, 48.9% of respondents reported a change in the initial surgical plan and 26.3% reported a shift from elective to urgent operations. Recovery of CRC care was associated with the status of the outbreak. Practicing in COVID-free units, no change in operative slots and staff members not relocated to COVID-19 units were statistically associated with unaltered CRC care in the ‘no delay’ group, while the geographical distribution was not. Conclusions Global changes in diagnostic and therapeutic CRC practices were evident. Changes were associated with differences in health-care delivery systems, hospital’s preparedness, resources availability, and local COVID-19 prevalence rather than geographical factors. Strategic planning is required to optimize CRC care
    corecore