Comparison of micro push-out bond strengths of two fiber posts luted using simplified adhesive approaches

By means of a micro push-out test, this study compared the bond strengths of two types of fiber-reinforced posts cemented with luting cements based on two currently available adhesive approaches as well as evaluated their failure modes. Sixty extracted single-rooted human maxillary central incisor and canine teeth were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the roots were endodontically treated. Following standardized post space preparation, the roots were divided into two fiber post groups and then further into three subgroups of 10 specimens each according to the luting cements. A push-out test was performed to measure regional bond strengths, and the fracture modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. At the root section, there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) in push-out bond strength among the tested luting cements. Nevertheless, the push-out bond strength values of glass fiber. reinforced posts were higher than those of carbon fiber-reinforced posts, irrespective of the adhesive approach used. On failure mode, the predominant failure mode was adhesive failure between dentin and the luting cement

Smile and dental aesthetics: a literature review

The importance of dentofacial appeal in regard to the individual's psycho-social well-being is a proven fact. One of the most important factors that affect people's smiles is teeth. A dental restorations positive impact on the patient's smile, appearance, self-confidence and overall mental health can not be underestimated. In this review, the relation between smile and dental aesthetics is being addressed together with teeth, gum, face elements, aesthetics criteria and cases. [Med-Science 2017; 6(1.000): 172-7

Push-out bond strengths of two fiber post types bonded with different dentin bonding agents (Retracted article. See vol. 100, pg. 1458, 2012)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the regional push-out bond strengths for two fiber-reinforced post types using three different dentin bonding agents Sixty single-rooted extracted human first premolar teeth were sectioned below the cemento-enamel junction, and the roots were endodontically treated Following standardized post space preparations, the roots were divided into two fiber-post groups (Glassix (R) and Carbopost (R)), and further divided into three subgroups of 10 specimens each for the bonding systems self-etching dentin bonding agents (Clearfil (TM) SE Bond and Optibond (R) all-in-one), and total-etching dentin bonding agent (XP Bond (TM)) A dual-cure resin luting cement (Maxcem (TM)) was then placed in the post spaces and posts were then seated into the root canals polymerized through the cervical portion The roots were then cut into 3-mm thick sections Push-out tests were performed at a crosshead speed of 0 5 mm/min. The data were analyzed with multivariate ANOVA (alpha = 0 05) The morphology of interface between different dentin bonding agents from the cervical sections were analyzed with SEM Glass fiber-reinforced posts demonstrated significantly higher push-out bond strengths than carbon fiber-reinforced posts (p < 00011 Bond strength values decreased significantly from the cervical to the apical root canal regions (p < 0 001) Self-etching dentin adhesive Clearfil SE Bond and total-etching dentin adhesive XP Bond demonstrated similar bond strengths values and this was significantly higher compared with the Optibond (R) all-in-one in cervical root canal region In conclusion, in all root segments, the glass fiber-reinforced posts provided significantly increased post retention than the carbon fiber-reinforced posts, regardless of the adhesive used (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 938 359-366, 201

Evaluation of Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Wear Behavior of Different Types of Resin Composites Polymerized With Two Different Light Sources

The microhardness, surface roughness and wear resistance of different types of resin composites, polymerized by a Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH) or Light Emitting Diode (LED) light curing units (LCU) were evaluated in this in vitro study. Cylindrical blocks were prepared from composites (8 mm in diameter, and 2 min in thickness) and polymerized by a LED or a QTH LCU. Vickers hardness was measured on the top and bottom surfaces of the specimens. Surface roughness was measured with a surface profilometer on the top of the specimens. For the wear test, specimens were tested in a conventional pin-on-disc tribology machine under 15 N loads. The statistical analyses were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests, including the Bonferroni correction. Nanocomposite material Clearfil Majesty (TM) Posterior showed the highest hardness values in all polymerization types at the top and bottom surfaces (p < 0.05). Microhybrid Clearfil (TM) APX and hybrid Quixfil (TM) composites demonstrated the greatest surface roughness. Wear resistance of Clearfil Majesty (TM) Posterior was found to be the highest among the other tested resin composites. The results indicated that Clearfil Majesty (TM) Posterior demonstrated higher microhardness, less surface roughness, and higher wear resistance when compared with the other tested materials for both polymerization types. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals. Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 92B: 470-478. 201

Micro push-out bond strengths of 2 fiber post types luted using different adhesive strategies

Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strengths of carbon and glass fiber posts adhesively luted with Panavia F 2.0 and RelyX Unicem luting cements, as well as a modified application procedure using RelyX Unicem cement in combination with a single-bottle total-etch adhesive in 3 segments of teeth

Influence of Bleaching Regimen and Time Elapsed on Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Enamel

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of time elapsed since bleaching and different bleaching regimens on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to enamel. Methodology: Forty flattened buccal enamel surfaces were divided into four groups: An unbleached (control) group and three bleaching groups. Control group specimens were not subjected to a bleaching regimen (Group 1), while those in the bleaching groups were bleached as follows: opalescence 10% (Group 2), whiteness perfect 16% (Group 3), and whiteness hydrogen peroxide 35% (Group 4). Thereafter, the bleached specimens were divided into three subgroups (n = 4 teeth each) for restoration according to predetermined posttreatment time intervals (immediately, 1 week, and 2 weeks). Bonded specimens were then sectioned and subjected to mu TBS testing. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests at a = 0.05. Results: There was a significant difference in the mu TBS of the resin composite to enamel in groups that were bonded immediately after bleaching and in the control group (P 0.05). Conclusions: Adhesive restorative procedures could not be performed immediately or after 1 week irrespective of the type or concentration of bleaching system used. Composite restorations on bleached enamel surfaces should be performed after an interval of at least 2 weeks

The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study

This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state

Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials

Background/purpose: Polishing systems may affect the surface characteristics of the tooth-colored restorative materials. In this in vitro study, we evaluated the surface roughness of various tooth-colored restorative materials after polishing them with three different polishing systems