Ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: its clinical potential

Ruxolitinib is an orally bioavailable, selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), a bone marrow disease in which the JAK pathway is dysregulated, leading to impaired hematopoiesis and immune function. By inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2, ruxolitinib modulates cytokine-stimulated intracellular signaling. In a phase II clinical trial in patients with MF, ruxolitinib recipients exhibited durable reductions in spleen size, reductions in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, improvements in physical activity, weight gain, and alleviation of symptoms (including constitutional symptoms) in patients with and without JAK2 mutation. These findings were confirmed by two phase III clinical MF studies, in which a greater proportion of ruxolitinib recipients achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline at week 24, compared with placebo in one study (41.9% versus 0.7%; P < 0.0001) and with best available therapy in the other (31.9% versus 0%; P < 0.0001). Alleviation of MF symptoms and improvements in quality of life were also significantly greater in ruxolitinib recipients. Overall survival of patients treated with ruxolitinib was significantly longer than of those receiving the placebo. Owing to risks of potentially serious adverse effects, eg, myelosuppression, ruxolitinib should be used under close physician supervision. Longer follow-up of the phase III MF studies is needed to reach firm conclusions regarding ruxolitinib’s capacity to modify the natural disease course

Momelotinib long-term safety and survival in myelofibrosis: Integrated analysis of Phase 3 randomized controlled trials

Momelotinib is the first inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 shown to also inhibit activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), a key regulator of iron homeostasis, and has demonstrated improvements in splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and anemia in myelofibrosis (MF). This long-term analysis pooled data from 3 randomized phase 3 studies of momelotinib (MOMENTUM, SIMPLIFY-1, and SIMPLIFY-2), representing MF disease from early (JAK inhibitor-naive) to late (JAK inhibitor-experienced) stages. Patients in the control arms (danazol in MOMENTUM, ruxolitinib in SIMPLIFY-1, and best available therapy in SIMPLIFY-2) could cross over to receive momelotinib at the end of the 24-week randomized period, and all patients could continue momelotinib treatment after the completion of these studies via an extended access protocol (XAP). Across these studies, 725 patients with MF received momelotinib; 12% remained on therapy for ≥5 years, with a median treatment exposure of 11.3 months (range, 0.1-90.4 months). The most common nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) occurring in ≥20% of patients was diarrhea (any grade, 27% and grade ≥3, 3%). Any-grade thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia occurred in 25%, 23%, and 7% of patients, respectively. The most common reason for momelotinib discontinuation was thrombocytopenia (4% discontinuation rate). The incidence of AEs of clinical importance (eg, infections, malignant transformation, peripheral neuropathy, and hemorrhage) did not increase over time. This analysis of one of the largest randomized trial databases for a JAK inhibitor to date in MF demonstrated a consistent safety profile of momelotinib without long-term or cumulative toxicity. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as: MOMENTUM (#NCT04173494), SIMPLIFY-1 (#NCT01969838), SIMPLIFY-2 (#NCT02101268), and XAP (#NCT03441113)

MOMENTUM: Momelotinib vs danazol in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with JAKi who are symptomatic and anemic

Hallmark features of myelofibrosis (MF) are cytopenias, constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly. Anemia and transfusion dependency are among the most important negative prognostic factors and are exacerbated by many JAK inhibitors (JAKi). Momelotinib (MMB) has been investigated in over 820 patients with MF and possesses a pharmacological and clinical profile differentiated from other JAKi by inhibition of JAK1, JAK2 and ACVR1. MMB is designed to address the complex drivers of iron-restricted anemia and chronic inflammation in MF and should improve constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly while maintaining or improving hemoglobin in JAKi-naive and previously JAKi-treated patients. The MOMENTUM Phase III study is designed to confirm and extend observations of safety and clinical activity of MMB

The organic arsenic derivative GMZ27 induces PML-RARα-independent apoptosis in myeloid leukemia cells

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is an inorganic arsenic derivative that is very effective against acute promyelocytic leukemia. However, organic arsenic derivatives (OAD) have a more favorable toxicity profile than ATO. We herein characterized dipropil-S-glycerol arsenic (GMZ27), a novel OAD. GMZ27 had potent antiproliferative activity against human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines that was higher than that of ATO. In contrast to ATO, GMZ27 only marginally induced maturation of leukemia cells and had no effect on the cell cycle. The anti-leukemia activity of GMZ27 against AML cells was independent of the presence of the PML-RARα fusion protein. GMZ27 dissipates mitochondrial transmembrane potential, and induces cleavage of caspase 9 and activation of caspase 3 without altering the expression levels of (BCL-2), BAX and BCL-xl. GMZ27 induces the formation of intracellular superoxide, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) which plays a major role in the antileukemia activity of this OAD. In addition to ROS generation, GMZ27 concomitantly reduces intracellular glutathione which markedly weakens the cellular antioxidant capacity, thus enhancing the detrimental intracellular effects of ROS production. These results indicate that GMZ27 induces apoptosis in AML cells in a PML-RARα-independent fashion, through the induction of ROS production. This activity provides the rationale for the testing of GMZ27 in patients with AML

Anemia in myelofibrosis: Current and emerging treatment options

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematologic malignancy with progressive bone marrow fibrosis. Clinical manifestations of MF include splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and anemia, whose pathogenesis is multifactorial and largely due to ineffective erythropoiesis and is clinically associated with poor quality of life and reduced overall survival. The only curative treatment for MF is allogenic stem cell transplantation; however, few patients are eligible. Disease management strategies for MF-related anemia have limited effectiveness, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may induce or worsen related anemia. Thus, there is a significant unmet need for the treatment of patients with MF-related anemia. This review summarizes current and emerging treatments for anemia in MF, including luspatercept and KER-050 (transforming growth factor-β ligand traps), momelotinib and pacritinib (JAK inhibitors), pelabresib (a bromodomain extra-terminal domain inhibitor), PRM-151 (an antifibrotic agent), imetelstat (a telomerase inhibitor), and navitoclax (a BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor). Therapeutic combinations with ruxolitinib may offer another treatment approach

Mpn-238 single-cell RNA profiling of myelofibrosis patients reveals pelabresib-induced decrease of megakaryocytic progenitors and normalization of CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood

Context: Abnormal differentiation of the megakaryocytic lineage and overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, resulting in bone marrow fibrosis, anemia, symptoms, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and often hepatosplenomegaly, are key characteristics of myelofibrosis. Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins play a significant role in the regulation of neoplastic myeloproliferation and proinflammatory cytokine production. Pelabresib (CPI-0610) is an investigational, oral, small-molecule BET inhibitor. Objective: Characterize cellular composition and transcriptional alterations in peripheral blood (PB) obtained from myelofibrosis patients enrolled in three arms (Arm 1: pelabresib monotherapy; Arm 2: pelabresib ‘add-on’ to ruxolitinib in patients with suboptimal ruxolitinib response; Arm 3: pelabresib with ruxolitinib in JAKi-naïve patients) of the ongoing MANIFEST Phase 2 study (NCT02158858). Methods: We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on 234,904 CD34+ HSPCs and 135,970 CD34– mature PB cells. Baseline and on-treatment samples were obtained from a random pool of 20 patients (Arm 1: n=5; Arm 2: n=8; Arm 3: n=7). Mobilized PB cells from healthy donors (HD) were used as controls (n=11). Results: Analysis of CD34+ HSPCs at baseline demonstrated increased numbers of megakaryocytic, neutrophilic, and erythroid progenitors in myelofibrosis patients compared with HDs and a significant reduction of myeloid and B-cell lineage progenitors. Pelabresib as monotherapy and combined with ruxolitinib led to significant reduction of megakaryocytic, neutrophilic, and erythroid progenitors compared with baseline. Analysis of CD34– cells from myelofibrosis patients identified a significantly lower proportion of CD4+ T cells and increased numbers of erythroid cells at baseline versus HD. Individual patients exhibited reduction in natural killer cells and CD16+ monocytes as well as elevated megakaryocytic lineage cells. Pelabresib as monotherapy and combined with ruxolitinib increased the proportion of CD4+ T cells, and, importantly, reduced megakaryocytic lineage cells in both treatment-naïve and ruxolitinib-relapsed/refractory patients. In myelofibrosis patients at baseline, larger spleen volume was observed in patients with lower numbers of CD4+ T cells and increased numbers of megakaryocytic and myeloid CSF3R+ cells. Conclusions: Single-cell profiling of a subset of myelofibrosis patients in the MANIFEST study suggests that pelabresib alone and in combination with ruxolitinib induces improvement of the myeloid–lymphoid imbalance. This potential disease-modifying effect warrants further investigation

Heterodimeric JAK-STAT Activation as a Mechanism of Persistence to JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy

The identification of somatic activating mutations in JAK21–4 and in the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL)5 in the majority of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients led to the clinical development of JAK2 kinase inhibitors6,7. JAK2 inhibitor therapy improves MPN-associated splenomegaly and systemic symptoms, but does not significantly reduce or eliminate the MPN clone in most MPN patients. We therefore sought to characterize mechanisms by which MPN cells persist despite chronic JAK2 inhibition. Here we show that JAK2 inhibitor persistence is associated with reactivation of JAK-STAT signaling and with heterodimerization between activated JAK2 and JAK1/TYK2, consistent with activation of JAK2 in trans by other JAK kinases. Further, this phenomenon is reversible, such that JAK2 inhibitor withdrawal is associated with resensitization to JAK2 kinase inhibitors and with reversible changes in JAK2 expression. We saw increased JAK2 heterodimerization and sustained JAK2 activation in cell lines, murine models, and patients treated with JAK2 inhibitors. RNA interference and pharmacologic studies demonstrate that JAK2 inhibitor persistent cells remain dependent on JAK2 protein expression. Consequently, therapies that result in JAK2 degradation retain efficacy in persistent cells and may provide additional benefit to patients with JAK2-dependent malignancies treated with JAK2 inhibitors

Changes in bone marrow fibrosis during momelotinib or ruxolitinib therapy do not correlate with efficacy outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis

JAK inhibitor; Bone marrow fibrosis; MomelotinibInhibidor de JAK; Fibrosi de la medul·la òssia; MomelotinibInhibidor de JAK; Fibrosis de la médula ósea; MomelotinibBone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a pathological feature of myelofibrosis, with higher grades associated with poor prognosis. Limited data exist on the association between outcomes and BMF changes. We present BMF data from Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor–naive patients from SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838), a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study of momelotinib vs ruxolitinib. Baseline and week 24 bone marrow biopsies were graded from 0 to 3 as per World Health Organization criteria. Other assessments included Total Symptom Score, spleen volume, transfusion independence status, and hemoglobin levels. Paired samples were available from 144 and 160 patients randomized to momelotinib and ruxolitinib. With momelotinib and ruxolitinib, transfusion independence was achieved by 87% and 44% of patients with BMF improvement of ≥1 grade and 76% and 56% of those with stable/worsening BMF; there was no association between BMF changes and transfusion independence for either arm (momelotinib, p = .350; ruxolitinib, p = .096). Regardless of BMF changes, hemoglobin levels also generally increased on momelotinib but decreased on ruxolitinib. In addition, no associations between BMF changes and spleen (momelotinib, p = .126; ruxolitinib, p = .407)/symptom (momelotinib, p = .617; ruxolitinib, p = .833) outcomes were noted, and no improvement in overall survival was observed with ≥1-grade BMF improvement (momelotinib, p = .395; ruxolitinib, p = .407). These data suggest that the anemia benefit of momelotinib is not linked to BMF changes, and question the use of BMF assessment as a surrogate marker for clinical benefit with JAK inhibitors.This study was sponsored by Sierra Oncology, a GSK company

Heterodimeric JAK-STAT Activation as a Mechanism of Persistence to JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy

The identification of somatic activating mutations in JAK21–4 and in the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL)5 in the majority of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients led to the clinical development of JAK2 kinase inhibitors6,7. JAK2 inhibitor therapy improves MPN-associated splenomegaly and systemic symptoms, but does not significantly reduce or eliminate the MPN clone in most MPN patients. We therefore sought to characterize mechanisms by which MPN cells persist despite chronic JAK2 inhibition. Here we show that JAK2 inhibitor persistence is associated with reactivation of JAK-STAT signaling and with heterodimerization between activated JAK2 and JAK1/TYK2, consistent with activation of JAK2 in trans by other JAK kinases. Further, this phenomenon is reversible, such that JAK2 inhibitor withdrawal is associated with resensitization to JAK2 kinase inhibitors and with reversible changes in JAK2 expression. We saw increased JAK2 heterodimerization and sustained JAK2 activation in cell lines, murine models, and patients treated with JAK2 inhibitors. RNA interference and pharmacologic studies demonstrate that JAK2 inhibitor persistent cells remain dependent on JAK2 protein expression. Consequently, therapies that result in JAK2 degradation retain efficacy in persistent cells and may provide additional benefit to patients with JAK2-dependent malignancies treated with JAK2 inhibitors